确定基于sdn的移动核心网中的延迟因素

C. Marquezan, Xueli An, Z. Despotovic, R. Khalili, A. Hecker
{"title":"确定基于sdn的移动核心网中的延迟因素","authors":"C. Marquezan, Xueli An, Z. Despotovic, R. Khalili, A. Hecker","doi":"10.1109/ISCC.2016.7543785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software Defined Networking (SDN) is considered one of the major driving factors to bring radical changes on Mobile Core Networks (MCN) design. There are many proposals on how to advocate SDN methodology, however, most of them stop at “vision” level without providing details about key performance contributors. In this paper, we tackle this gap and present a study of latency in SDN based MCN. We identify the major factors and elements in an SDN MCN that contribute to the overall latency. Two types of latency are considered: the processing delay inside the SDN control plane and the transmission delay of SDN control messages between controller and the managed switches. We use a realistic system setup with implementations of SDN controller and SDN application, as well as in-band transfer of control messages among switches and controller. We compare the latency obtained from SDN based MCN with the Evolved Packet Core (EPC). The observed overall latency in our experiments for SDN based MCN is within the EPC requirements. The direct comparison of the SDN versus EPC based MCN in the proposed scenarios show the first can reduce the overall latency. We also identified that the calls to controller APIs can be the major key contributors to the overall latency in SDN MCN, but the act of transmitting more control messages from the controller to the switches to setup longer flowpaths is not a key contributor for the overall latency.","PeriodicalId":148096,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying latency factors in SDN-based Mobile Core Networks\",\"authors\":\"C. Marquezan, Xueli An, Z. Despotovic, R. Khalili, A. Hecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCC.2016.7543785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software Defined Networking (SDN) is considered one of the major driving factors to bring radical changes on Mobile Core Networks (MCN) design. There are many proposals on how to advocate SDN methodology, however, most of them stop at “vision” level without providing details about key performance contributors. In this paper, we tackle this gap and present a study of latency in SDN based MCN. We identify the major factors and elements in an SDN MCN that contribute to the overall latency. Two types of latency are considered: the processing delay inside the SDN control plane and the transmission delay of SDN control messages between controller and the managed switches. We use a realistic system setup with implementations of SDN controller and SDN application, as well as in-band transfer of control messages among switches and controller. We compare the latency obtained from SDN based MCN with the Evolved Packet Core (EPC). The observed overall latency in our experiments for SDN based MCN is within the EPC requirements. The direct comparison of the SDN versus EPC based MCN in the proposed scenarios show the first can reduce the overall latency. We also identified that the calls to controller APIs can be the major key contributors to the overall latency in SDN MCN, but the act of transmitting more control messages from the controller to the switches to setup longer flowpaths is not a key contributor for the overall latency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2016.7543785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2016.7543785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

软件定义网络(SDN)被认为是移动核心网(MCN)设计发生根本性变化的主要驱动因素之一。有很多关于如何倡导SDN方法的建议,然而,大多数都停留在“愿景”层面,而没有提供有关关键性能贡献者的详细信息。在本文中,我们解决了这一差距,并提出了基于SDN的MCN的延迟研究。我们确定了SDN MCN中导致整体延迟的主要因素和元素。考虑两种类型的延迟:SDN控制平面内部的处理延迟和控制器与管理交换机之间SDN控制消息的传输延迟。我们使用一个实际的系统设置,实现SDN控制器和SDN应用程序,以及交换机和控制器之间的带内传输控制消息。我们比较了基于SDN的MCN与EPC (Evolved Packet Core)的时延。我们在基于SDN的MCN实验中观察到的总延迟在EPC要求范围内。在建议的场景中,SDN与基于EPC的MCN的直接比较表明,前者可以减少总体延迟。我们还发现,对控制器api的调用可能是SDN MCN中总延迟的主要关键因素,但是从控制器向交换机传输更多控制消息以设置更长的流路径的行为并不是总延迟的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying latency factors in SDN-based Mobile Core Networks
Software Defined Networking (SDN) is considered one of the major driving factors to bring radical changes on Mobile Core Networks (MCN) design. There are many proposals on how to advocate SDN methodology, however, most of them stop at “vision” level without providing details about key performance contributors. In this paper, we tackle this gap and present a study of latency in SDN based MCN. We identify the major factors and elements in an SDN MCN that contribute to the overall latency. Two types of latency are considered: the processing delay inside the SDN control plane and the transmission delay of SDN control messages between controller and the managed switches. We use a realistic system setup with implementations of SDN controller and SDN application, as well as in-band transfer of control messages among switches and controller. We compare the latency obtained from SDN based MCN with the Evolved Packet Core (EPC). The observed overall latency in our experiments for SDN based MCN is within the EPC requirements. The direct comparison of the SDN versus EPC based MCN in the proposed scenarios show the first can reduce the overall latency. We also identified that the calls to controller APIs can be the major key contributors to the overall latency in SDN MCN, but the act of transmitting more control messages from the controller to the switches to setup longer flowpaths is not a key contributor for the overall latency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Joint power control and sub-channel allocation for co-channel OFDMA femtocells Measuring the users and conversations of a vibrant online emotional support system An efficient KP-ABE scheme for content protection in Information-Centric Networking Energy-efficient MAC schemes for Delay-Tolerant Sensor Networks FRT-Skip Graph: A Skip Graph-style structured overlay based on Flexible Routing Tables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1