尼日利亚伊巴丹热带雨林-稀树草原过渡生态区秋葵田杂草干扰关键期现场评价

R. Awodoyin, O. Olubode
{"title":"尼日利亚伊巴丹热带雨林-稀树草原过渡生态区秋葵田杂草干扰关键期现场评价","authors":"R. Awodoyin, O. Olubode","doi":"10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.2011.911.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The critical period of weed interference is defined as the period in the life cycle of a crop during which it must be kept free of weeds to prevent unacceptable yield losses. The critical period of weed interference in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] was determined in the field trials during two cropping seasons (2006 and 2007) in the crop garden of the Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan located in the rainforest-savanna transition ecological zone of Nigeria. The study, consisting of two sets of treatments was carried out in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. In the first set of treatments, the crop was kept free of weeds for the first 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after planting (WAP) and subsequently weeds were allowed to grow (weed-free then weedy, WF-WD) until harvest, to determine the growth stage at which emerging weeds would no longer reduce the crop yields. In the second set of treatments, weeds were permitted to grow with the crop for an increasing length of time as listed above and subsequently the plots remained weed-free (weedy then weed-free, WD-WF) to determine the period at which weeds emerging with the crop began to suppress the growth of the crop and reduce its yield. Seasonlong weed-free (WD-0-WF) and weedy (WF-0-WD) treatments served as checks to compare weed competition and yield losses with other treatments. Season-long weed interference with okra resulted in 42.3% and 33.3% reduction in plant height, 54.9% and 45.5% reduction in stem diameter and 71.2% and 79.5% reduction in okra shoot dry weight in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Weeds that interfered with okra from 2 WAP resulted in 79.8% and 72.5% fresh fruit yield reduction in 2006 and 2007 respectively, and weed interference with okra from 8 WAP resulted in 19.8% and 19.6% yield losses in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Thirty one (31) weed species were enumerated in the study area with dicotyledons being the most prevalent (80.7%). The most important of the weed species among the dicotyledons was Synedrella As. J. Food Ag-Ind. 2009, Special Issue, S288-S296 289 nodiflora (RIV=12.5%) and among the monocotyledons was Panicum repens (RIV=9.5%). The Shannon-Wiener Index and Equitability index for the community was 2.804 and 0.817, respectively. In 2006, weeds that interfered with okra for the first 2 WAP resulted in 17% yield reduction while the season-long interference resulted in a 90.2% yield reduction. Also in 2007, competition between weeds and okra for the first 2 WAP and season-long interference resulted in 16.4% and 92.2% fresh fruit yield reduction, respectively. Results in the two cropping seasons showed that, to prevent >10% fruit yield losses in okra, the field must be kept free of weeds throughout the entire growing cycle.","PeriodicalId":194630,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry","volume":"337 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-field assessment of critical period of weed interference in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) moench] field in Ibadan, a rainforest-savanna transition eco-zone of Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"R. Awodoyin, O. Olubode\",\"doi\":\"10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.2011.911.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The critical period of weed interference is defined as the period in the life cycle of a crop during which it must be kept free of weeds to prevent unacceptable yield losses. The critical period of weed interference in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] was determined in the field trials during two cropping seasons (2006 and 2007) in the crop garden of the Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan located in the rainforest-savanna transition ecological zone of Nigeria. The study, consisting of two sets of treatments was carried out in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. In the first set of treatments, the crop was kept free of weeds for the first 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after planting (WAP) and subsequently weeds were allowed to grow (weed-free then weedy, WF-WD) until harvest, to determine the growth stage at which emerging weeds would no longer reduce the crop yields. In the second set of treatments, weeds were permitted to grow with the crop for an increasing length of time as listed above and subsequently the plots remained weed-free (weedy then weed-free, WD-WF) to determine the period at which weeds emerging with the crop began to suppress the growth of the crop and reduce its yield. Seasonlong weed-free (WD-0-WF) and weedy (WF-0-WD) treatments served as checks to compare weed competition and yield losses with other treatments. Season-long weed interference with okra resulted in 42.3% and 33.3% reduction in plant height, 54.9% and 45.5% reduction in stem diameter and 71.2% and 79.5% reduction in okra shoot dry weight in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Weeds that interfered with okra from 2 WAP resulted in 79.8% and 72.5% fresh fruit yield reduction in 2006 and 2007 respectively, and weed interference with okra from 8 WAP resulted in 19.8% and 19.6% yield losses in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Thirty one (31) weed species were enumerated in the study area with dicotyledons being the most prevalent (80.7%). The most important of the weed species among the dicotyledons was Synedrella As. J. Food Ag-Ind. 2009, Special Issue, S288-S296 289 nodiflora (RIV=12.5%) and among the monocotyledons was Panicum repens (RIV=9.5%). The Shannon-Wiener Index and Equitability index for the community was 2.804 and 0.817, respectively. In 2006, weeds that interfered with okra for the first 2 WAP resulted in 17% yield reduction while the season-long interference resulted in a 90.2% yield reduction. Also in 2007, competition between weeds and okra for the first 2 WAP and season-long interference resulted in 16.4% and 92.2% fresh fruit yield reduction, respectively. Results in the two cropping seasons showed that, to prevent >10% fruit yield losses in okra, the field must be kept free of weeds throughout the entire growing cycle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry\",\"volume\":\"337 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.2011.911.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.2011.911.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

杂草干扰的关键期定义为作物生命周期中必须保持无杂草的时期,以防止不可接受的产量损失。秋葵杂草干扰的关键时期研究Moench]是在两个种植季节(2006年和2007年)在伊巴丹大学作物保护和环境生物学系的作物园内进行的田间试验中确定的,伊巴丹大学位于尼日利亚的热带雨林-热带草原过渡生态区。该研究由两组处理组成,采用随机完全区组设计,有3个重复。在第一组处理中,种植后的前2周、4周、6周和8周(WAP)保持作物无杂草,随后允许杂草生长(无杂草,然后杂草,WF-WD)直到收获,以确定新出现的杂草不再降低作物产量的生长阶段。在第二组处理中,如上文所列,杂草随作物生长的时间越来越长,随后地块保持无杂草(杂草然后无杂草,WD-WF),以确定杂草随作物出现开始抑制作物生长并降低其产量的时期。季节性无杂草(WD-0-WF)和有杂草(WF-0-WD)处理作为对照,与其他处理比较杂草竞争和产量损失。在2006年和2007年,杂草对秋葵的长期干扰导致秋葵株高降低42.3%和33.3%,茎粗降低54.9%和45.5%,地上部干重降低71.2%和79.5%。杂草干扰2个WAP的秋葵,2006年和2007年鲜果产量分别下降79.8%和72.5%,杂草干扰8个WAP的秋葵,2006年和2007年鲜果产量分别下降19.8%和19.6%。研究区共有31种杂草,以双子叶类杂草最多(80.7%)。最重要的在双子叶植物是Synedrella杂草物种。J.食品农业;2009, Special Issue, S288-S296 289 nodiflora (RIV=12.5%),单子叶植物中有Panicum repens (RIV=9.5%)。群落的Shannon-Wiener指数为2.804,公平性指数为0.817。2006年,杂草干扰秋葵的前2个WAP导致产量下降17%,而整个季节的干扰导致产量下降90.2%。同样在2007年,杂草和秋葵对前2个WAP的竞争和整个季节的干扰分别导致新鲜水果产量下降16.4%和92.2%。两个种植季的结果表明,为了防止秋葵果实损失>10%,必须在整个生长周期内保持田地无杂草。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On-field assessment of critical period of weed interference in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) moench] field in Ibadan, a rainforest-savanna transition eco-zone of Nigeria.
The critical period of weed interference is defined as the period in the life cycle of a crop during which it must be kept free of weeds to prevent unacceptable yield losses. The critical period of weed interference in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] was determined in the field trials during two cropping seasons (2006 and 2007) in the crop garden of the Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan located in the rainforest-savanna transition ecological zone of Nigeria. The study, consisting of two sets of treatments was carried out in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. In the first set of treatments, the crop was kept free of weeds for the first 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after planting (WAP) and subsequently weeds were allowed to grow (weed-free then weedy, WF-WD) until harvest, to determine the growth stage at which emerging weeds would no longer reduce the crop yields. In the second set of treatments, weeds were permitted to grow with the crop for an increasing length of time as listed above and subsequently the plots remained weed-free (weedy then weed-free, WD-WF) to determine the period at which weeds emerging with the crop began to suppress the growth of the crop and reduce its yield. Seasonlong weed-free (WD-0-WF) and weedy (WF-0-WD) treatments served as checks to compare weed competition and yield losses with other treatments. Season-long weed interference with okra resulted in 42.3% and 33.3% reduction in plant height, 54.9% and 45.5% reduction in stem diameter and 71.2% and 79.5% reduction in okra shoot dry weight in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Weeds that interfered with okra from 2 WAP resulted in 79.8% and 72.5% fresh fruit yield reduction in 2006 and 2007 respectively, and weed interference with okra from 8 WAP resulted in 19.8% and 19.6% yield losses in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Thirty one (31) weed species were enumerated in the study area with dicotyledons being the most prevalent (80.7%). The most important of the weed species among the dicotyledons was Synedrella As. J. Food Ag-Ind. 2009, Special Issue, S288-S296 289 nodiflora (RIV=12.5%) and among the monocotyledons was Panicum repens (RIV=9.5%). The Shannon-Wiener Index and Equitability index for the community was 2.804 and 0.817, respectively. In 2006, weeds that interfered with okra for the first 2 WAP resulted in 17% yield reduction while the season-long interference resulted in a 90.2% yield reduction. Also in 2007, competition between weeds and okra for the first 2 WAP and season-long interference resulted in 16.4% and 92.2% fresh fruit yield reduction, respectively. Results in the two cropping seasons showed that, to prevent >10% fruit yield losses in okra, the field must be kept free of weeds throughout the entire growing cycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On-field assessment of critical period of weed interference in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) moench] field in Ibadan, a rainforest-savanna transition eco-zone of Nigeria. Manufacture of carbonated tender coconut water and development of a process for the utilization of coconut flesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1