最高法院的抗议与比例:一个重要的“初步问题”

Rebecca Sage
{"title":"最高法院的抗议与比例:一个重要的“初步问题”","authors":"Rebecca Sage","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2179294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. The Bill sought to introduce ‘safe access zones’ around abortion clinics in Northern Ireland. At cl 5(2)(a), the Bill made it an offence to ‘to do an act in a safe access zone with the intent of, or reckless as to whether it has the effect of – (a) influencing a protected person, whether directly or indirectly [...]’. A ‘protected person’ was defined as including those attending clinics to access treatment, information, advice or counselling, those accompanying such a person at their invitation, and those working in or providing services to the clinic (cl 3).","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protest and Proportionality in the Supreme Court: A Significant ‘Preliminary Issue’\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Sage\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2023.2179294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2. The Bill sought to introduce ‘safe access zones’ around abortion clinics in Northern Ireland. At cl 5(2)(a), the Bill made it an offence to ‘to do an act in a safe access zone with the intent of, or reckless as to whether it has the effect of – (a) influencing a protected person, whether directly or indirectly [...]’. A ‘protected person’ was defined as including those attending clinics to access treatment, information, advice or counselling, those accompanying such a person at their invitation, and those working in or providing services to the clinic (cl 3).\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"216 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2179294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2179294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2. 该法案试图在北爱尔兰堕胎诊所周围设立“安全通道区”。在第5条第(2)(a)款中,该法案规定,“在安全出入区内意图或不顾其是否具有- (a)直接或间接影响受保护人[…]的效果而采取行动”即属犯罪。“受保护人员”的定义包括到诊所接受治疗、获取信息、建议或咨询的人,应其邀请陪同的人,以及在诊所工作或向诊所提供服务的人(第三条)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protest and Proportionality in the Supreme Court: A Significant ‘Preliminary Issue’
2. The Bill sought to introduce ‘safe access zones’ around abortion clinics in Northern Ireland. At cl 5(2)(a), the Bill made it an offence to ‘to do an act in a safe access zone with the intent of, or reckless as to whether it has the effect of – (a) influencing a protected person, whether directly or indirectly [...]’. A ‘protected person’ was defined as including those attending clinics to access treatment, information, advice or counselling, those accompanying such a person at their invitation, and those working in or providing services to the clinic (cl 3).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1