买方分析师是否为卖方分析师的研究提供信息?

G. Cici, Philip B. Shane, Yanhua Sunny Sunny Yang
{"title":"买方分析师是否为卖方分析师的研究提供信息?","authors":"G. Cici, Philip B. Shane, Yanhua Sunny Sunny Yang","doi":"10.1111/acfi.13158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines whether sell‐side analysts' interactions with buy‐side analysts influence the quality of sell‐side research output. We hypothesise that these interactions offer the sell side a view of the buy side's private information, which enhances the quality of sell‐side research. Our findings show that analyst earnings forecast accuracy improves with these interactions with diminishing returns. Results are robust to alternative proxies for research quality and information flow from buy‐side to sell‐side analysts. Additional tests rule out endogeneity concerns, strengthening the inference that feedback from interactions with buy‐side analysts improves the quality of sell‐side research output.","PeriodicalId":335953,"journal":{"name":"Accounting & Finance","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do buy‐side analysts inform sell‐side analyst research?\",\"authors\":\"G. Cici, Philip B. Shane, Yanhua Sunny Sunny Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acfi.13158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines whether sell‐side analysts' interactions with buy‐side analysts influence the quality of sell‐side research output. We hypothesise that these interactions offer the sell side a view of the buy side's private information, which enhances the quality of sell‐side research. Our findings show that analyst earnings forecast accuracy improves with these interactions with diminishing returns. Results are robust to alternative proxies for research quality and information flow from buy‐side to sell‐side analysts. Additional tests rule out endogeneity concerns, strengthening the inference that feedback from interactions with buy‐side analysts improves the quality of sell‐side research output.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting & Finance\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了卖方分析师与买方分析师的互动是否会影响卖方研究产出的质量。我们假设这些互动为卖方提供了买方私人信息的视角,从而提高了卖方研究的质量。我们的研究结果表明,分析师收益预测的准确性随着收益递减的相互作用而提高。结果对于研究质量和从买方到卖方分析师的信息流的替代代理是稳健的。额外的测试排除了内生性问题,加强了与买方分析师互动的反馈可以提高卖方研究产出质量的推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do buy‐side analysts inform sell‐side analyst research?
This paper examines whether sell‐side analysts' interactions with buy‐side analysts influence the quality of sell‐side research output. We hypothesise that these interactions offer the sell side a view of the buy side's private information, which enhances the quality of sell‐side research. Our findings show that analyst earnings forecast accuracy improves with these interactions with diminishing returns. Results are robust to alternative proxies for research quality and information flow from buy‐side to sell‐side analysts. Additional tests rule out endogeneity concerns, strengthening the inference that feedback from interactions with buy‐side analysts improves the quality of sell‐side research output.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keju tradition and major litigation cases: The persistent impact of Confucian norm standard The effect of government‐guided funds on target industries in development zones – Evidence from China Philanthropic forms of corporate social responsibility practices in a multinational company: Colonial and post‐colonial perspectives Rent‐seeking or value‐creating? The impact of managerial autonomy from state‐built corporate pyramids on M&A performance Government procurement and zombie firms' productivity: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1