页岩脆性指数预测的人工智能方法——以中东盆地为例

A. Mustafa, Zeeshan Tariq, M. Mahmoud, A. Abdulraheem
{"title":"页岩脆性指数预测的人工智能方法——以中东盆地为例","authors":"A. Mustafa, Zeeshan Tariq, M. Mahmoud, A. Abdulraheem","doi":"10.2118/209707-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Brittleness Index (BI) of rocks can help target the most suitable formation for the hydraulic fracturing stimulation in the tight shale reservoirs. The two most widely used approaches in the petroleum industry are based on mineralogical composition and elastic parameters for the BI estimation. However, these approaches may not be applied for all wells for BI determination due to the scarcity of mineralogical-composition and shear wave slowness data.\n This paper presents a machine learning (ML) approach to predict the BI using readily available well logs. Well log data were collected from three different wells that encompass a total of 2000 ft thick interval of potential shale gas formation in one of the middle eastern basins. Mineralogical composition of shale formation revealed that the shale intervals are comprising of alternate high brittle and low brittle zones and mainly composed of quartz, clay, feldspar, and mica. Feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) were employed to develop the predictive model for the BI.\n The proposed model was tested and validated to check the consistency of the model. The reliability of the proposed AI model was reflected by the correlation coefficient (CC) ‘0.97’ between predicted and actual brittleness indices. The root mean squared ‘RMSE’ and average absolute percentage error ‘AAPE’ of the predicted brittleness were observed as 3.78 percent and 1.98 respectively for the ANN model. AAPE and RMSE for ANFIS predictive model were 3.51 and 1.81 respectively. The coefficient of determinations (R2) for ANN and ANFIS models were 0.945 and 0.951 respectively.ANN was found to be better than ANFIS by giving high accuracy. The proposed model was then compared with widely used models in the industry such as Jarvie et al., (2007) and Rybacki et al., (2016) on a blind dataset.\n The predictive model was also validated by comparing with two widely used mineralogy-based approaches. The developed approach can be applied to identify the brittle layers/zones within the shale gas reservoirs to optimize the hydraulic fracturing stimulation treatment. Results showed that the proposed model outperformed previous models by giving less error.","PeriodicalId":148855,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 09, 2022","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Approach for Predicting the Shale Brittleness Index - A Middle East Basin Case Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Mustafa, Zeeshan Tariq, M. Mahmoud, A. Abdulraheem\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/209707-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Brittleness Index (BI) of rocks can help target the most suitable formation for the hydraulic fracturing stimulation in the tight shale reservoirs. The two most widely used approaches in the petroleum industry are based on mineralogical composition and elastic parameters for the BI estimation. However, these approaches may not be applied for all wells for BI determination due to the scarcity of mineralogical-composition and shear wave slowness data.\\n This paper presents a machine learning (ML) approach to predict the BI using readily available well logs. Well log data were collected from three different wells that encompass a total of 2000 ft thick interval of potential shale gas formation in one of the middle eastern basins. Mineralogical composition of shale formation revealed that the shale intervals are comprising of alternate high brittle and low brittle zones and mainly composed of quartz, clay, feldspar, and mica. Feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) were employed to develop the predictive model for the BI.\\n The proposed model was tested and validated to check the consistency of the model. The reliability of the proposed AI model was reflected by the correlation coefficient (CC) ‘0.97’ between predicted and actual brittleness indices. The root mean squared ‘RMSE’ and average absolute percentage error ‘AAPE’ of the predicted brittleness were observed as 3.78 percent and 1.98 respectively for the ANN model. AAPE and RMSE for ANFIS predictive model were 3.51 and 1.81 respectively. The coefficient of determinations (R2) for ANN and ANFIS models were 0.945 and 0.951 respectively.ANN was found to be better than ANFIS by giving high accuracy. The proposed model was then compared with widely used models in the industry such as Jarvie et al., (2007) and Rybacki et al., (2016) on a blind dataset.\\n The predictive model was also validated by comparing with two widely used mineralogy-based approaches. The developed approach can be applied to identify the brittle layers/zones within the shale gas reservoirs to optimize the hydraulic fracturing stimulation treatment. Results showed that the proposed model outperformed previous models by giving less error.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, June 09, 2022\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, June 09, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/209707-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 09, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209707-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

岩石脆性指数(BI)可以帮助致密页岩储层找到最适合进行水力压裂改造的地层。石油工业中最广泛使用的两种方法是基于矿物成分和弹性参数进行BI估计。然而,由于缺乏矿物成分和横波慢度数据,这些方法可能不适用于所有井的BI测定。本文提出了一种机器学习(ML)方法,利用现成的测井资料预测BI。测井数据来自中东盆地的三口不同的井,这些井覆盖了2000英尺厚的潜在页岩气地层。页岩地层矿物组成表明,页岩层段由高脆性带和低脆性带交替组成,主要由石英、粘土、长石和云母组成。采用前馈人工神经网络(ANN)和自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)建立了BI预测模型。对所提出的模型进行了测试和验证,以检验模型的一致性。预测脆性指标与实际脆性指标的相关系数(CC)为0.97,反映了该模型的可靠性。ANN模型预测脆性的均方根' RMSE '和平均绝对百分比误差' AAPE '分别为3.78%和1.98。ANFIS预测模型的AAPE和RMSE分别为3.51和1.81。ANN和ANFIS模型的决定系数(R2)分别为0.945和0.951。结果表明,人工神经网络的准确率较高,优于人工神经网络。然后将提出的模型与行业中广泛使用的模型(如Jarvie等人,(2007)和Rybacki等人,(2016))在盲数据集上进行比较。通过与两种广泛使用的矿物学方法进行比较,验证了预测模型的有效性。该方法可用于识别页岩气储层中的脆性层/层,以优化水力压裂增产措施。结果表明,该模型误差较小,优于以往的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial Intelligence Approach for Predicting the Shale Brittleness Index - A Middle East Basin Case Study
Brittleness Index (BI) of rocks can help target the most suitable formation for the hydraulic fracturing stimulation in the tight shale reservoirs. The two most widely used approaches in the petroleum industry are based on mineralogical composition and elastic parameters for the BI estimation. However, these approaches may not be applied for all wells for BI determination due to the scarcity of mineralogical-composition and shear wave slowness data. This paper presents a machine learning (ML) approach to predict the BI using readily available well logs. Well log data were collected from three different wells that encompass a total of 2000 ft thick interval of potential shale gas formation in one of the middle eastern basins. Mineralogical composition of shale formation revealed that the shale intervals are comprising of alternate high brittle and low brittle zones and mainly composed of quartz, clay, feldspar, and mica. Feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) were employed to develop the predictive model for the BI. The proposed model was tested and validated to check the consistency of the model. The reliability of the proposed AI model was reflected by the correlation coefficient (CC) ‘0.97’ between predicted and actual brittleness indices. The root mean squared ‘RMSE’ and average absolute percentage error ‘AAPE’ of the predicted brittleness were observed as 3.78 percent and 1.98 respectively for the ANN model. AAPE and RMSE for ANFIS predictive model were 3.51 and 1.81 respectively. The coefficient of determinations (R2) for ANN and ANFIS models were 0.945 and 0.951 respectively.ANN was found to be better than ANFIS by giving high accuracy. The proposed model was then compared with widely used models in the industry such as Jarvie et al., (2007) and Rybacki et al., (2016) on a blind dataset. The predictive model was also validated by comparing with two widely used mineralogy-based approaches. The developed approach can be applied to identify the brittle layers/zones within the shale gas reservoirs to optimize the hydraulic fracturing stimulation treatment. Results showed that the proposed model outperformed previous models by giving less error.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing CO2-EOR in Indonesia by Matching Business Strategy: Study Case East Java Field, Indonesia A Deep-Learning-Based Approach for Production Forecast and Reservoir Evaluation for Shale Gas Wells with Complex Fracture Networks Oil Recovery by Low-Rate Waterflooding in Water-Wet Sandstone Cores A Universal Method for Predicting the Relative Permeability Data of Low Salinity Injection Investigation and Simulation of SWAG injections Performed in Mixed-Wet Carbonate Rocks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1