日本卫生政策制定的结构与过程

Iryo To Shakai Pub Date : 2021-07-08 DOI:10.4091/IKEN.31-71
Ichiro Innami
{"title":"日本卫生政策制定的结构与过程","authors":"Ichiro Innami","doi":"10.4091/IKEN.31-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health policy making is very complex political process involving the interactions between multiple governmental agencies and pressure groups, requiring long time, and affected by socio-economical ups-and-downs and national elections. At the end of 2020, two policy issues reached conclusions under the COVID-19 calamity: the introductions of 20% patient burden into the Health Insurance System for the Late Elderly, and the increased outpatient burden without referral when visiting large hospitals. Why did these things happen? To answer why, this study did three things: the historical and institutional considerations on the strengthening of the Cabinet, the development of the governance structure of actors and conference bodies, and the process tracking of the above two issues. Findings are (1) under the parliamentary cabinet system and the stable majority of the ruling party the reform of the political system in 1994, the repositioning of the governmental agencies and conference bodies in 2001, and the gradual strengthening of the cabinet functions in later years, helped the cabinet to have more efficient consensus making mechanisms than before, and (2) appropriate measures were wisely adopted, depending on the level of political difficulties, which in turn depends on the unique features of the issue (and their effects on national election) and the level of the resistance by the opposing pressure groups. Limitations of the study were also discussed.","PeriodicalId":117299,"journal":{"name":"Iryo To Shakai","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Structure and Process of Health Policy Making in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Ichiro Innami\",\"doi\":\"10.4091/IKEN.31-71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Health policy making is very complex political process involving the interactions between multiple governmental agencies and pressure groups, requiring long time, and affected by socio-economical ups-and-downs and national elections. At the end of 2020, two policy issues reached conclusions under the COVID-19 calamity: the introductions of 20% patient burden into the Health Insurance System for the Late Elderly, and the increased outpatient burden without referral when visiting large hospitals. Why did these things happen? To answer why, this study did three things: the historical and institutional considerations on the strengthening of the Cabinet, the development of the governance structure of actors and conference bodies, and the process tracking of the above two issues. Findings are (1) under the parliamentary cabinet system and the stable majority of the ruling party the reform of the political system in 1994, the repositioning of the governmental agencies and conference bodies in 2001, and the gradual strengthening of the cabinet functions in later years, helped the cabinet to have more efficient consensus making mechanisms than before, and (2) appropriate measures were wisely adopted, depending on the level of political difficulties, which in turn depends on the unique features of the issue (and their effects on national election) and the level of the resistance by the opposing pressure groups. Limitations of the study were also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iryo To Shakai\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iryo To Shakai\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4091/IKEN.31-71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iryo To Shakai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4091/IKEN.31-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生政策制定是一个非常复杂的政治过程,涉及多个政府机构和压力集团之间的相互作用,需要很长时间,并受到社会经济起伏和国家选举的影响。2020年底,在新冠疫情下,两项政策问题得出了结论:将20%的患者负担纳入老年医保体系,以及在大型医院就诊时不转诊的门诊负担增加。为什么会发生这些事情?为了回答这一问题,本研究做了三个方面的研究:加强内阁的历史和制度考量、行为体和会议机构治理结构的发展以及对上述两个问题的过程跟踪。研究发现:(1)在内阁制和执政党稳定多数的情况下,1994年的政治体制改革、2001年政府机构和会议机构的重新定位以及后来内阁职能的逐步加强,使内阁拥有了比以前更有效的共识形成机制;(2)根据政治困难程度,明智地采取了适当的措施;这反过来又取决于问题的独特性(及其对全国选举的影响)和对立压力集团的抵制程度。本文还讨论了本研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Structure and Process of Health Policy Making in Japan
Health policy making is very complex political process involving the interactions between multiple governmental agencies and pressure groups, requiring long time, and affected by socio-economical ups-and-downs and national elections. At the end of 2020, two policy issues reached conclusions under the COVID-19 calamity: the introductions of 20% patient burden into the Health Insurance System for the Late Elderly, and the increased outpatient burden without referral when visiting large hospitals. Why did these things happen? To answer why, this study did three things: the historical and institutional considerations on the strengthening of the Cabinet, the development of the governance structure of actors and conference bodies, and the process tracking of the above two issues. Findings are (1) under the parliamentary cabinet system and the stable majority of the ruling party the reform of the political system in 1994, the repositioning of the governmental agencies and conference bodies in 2001, and the gradual strengthening of the cabinet functions in later years, helped the cabinet to have more efficient consensus making mechanisms than before, and (2) appropriate measures were wisely adopted, depending on the level of political difficulties, which in turn depends on the unique features of the issue (and their effects on national election) and the level of the resistance by the opposing pressure groups. Limitations of the study were also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
次のテクノロジーでヘルスケアはどう変わるか 変革を生み出す中外製薬のDX戦略 ワクチンの研究開発支援プログラムの現状とバイオ医薬品開発を通して見た「育成」 バイオCDMO事業から視た創薬力の強化ポイント 産官学少人数懇談会 開催趣旨・理事長挨拶・座長挨拶
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1