Mark Scott, Will Perdikakis, Chase Kitzmiller, K. Yost, Chad Miller
{"title":"对电气化运输中使用的两种电机进行了电磁干扰比较","authors":"Mark Scott, Will Perdikakis, Chase Kitzmiller, K. Yost, Chad Miller","doi":"10.1109/ITEC53557.2022.9813821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) generated by a two-level voltage-source inverter (VSI) that performs active rectification. The paper evaluates two test configurations. The first configuration uses an aerospace wound-field synchronous (WF) machine as the active-rectifier’s power source. For the second configuration, the active rectifier’s power source is an automotive interior permanent magnet (IPM) machine. Each machine provides a nominal 115Vac at a power level of 40kW, and the active rectifier converts the ac-voltage to a nominal 270Vdc. The research evaluates each active rectifier configuration against MIL-STD-461G and DO-160G, and in both cases, the active rectifier produces higher EMI when the IPM machine is the power source. Finally, this study designs and analyzes four second-order common-mode filters and four fourth-order common-mode filters. The result is that each machine has two filters to pass MIL-STD-461G and two filters to comply with DO-160G. As expected, the IPM-based active rectification systems needs a larger common-mode inductance under every testing condition. It requires a second-order filter inductance that is 12-times higher than the WF-based active rectifier system. The second-order filter’s inductance is 80-times larger for DO-160G compliance.","PeriodicalId":275570,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conducted EMI Comparison of Two Electric Machines used in Electrified Transportation\",\"authors\":\"Mark Scott, Will Perdikakis, Chase Kitzmiller, K. Yost, Chad Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITEC53557.2022.9813821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) generated by a two-level voltage-source inverter (VSI) that performs active rectification. The paper evaluates two test configurations. The first configuration uses an aerospace wound-field synchronous (WF) machine as the active-rectifier’s power source. For the second configuration, the active rectifier’s power source is an automotive interior permanent magnet (IPM) machine. Each machine provides a nominal 115Vac at a power level of 40kW, and the active rectifier converts the ac-voltage to a nominal 270Vdc. The research evaluates each active rectifier configuration against MIL-STD-461G and DO-160G, and in both cases, the active rectifier produces higher EMI when the IPM machine is the power source. Finally, this study designs and analyzes four second-order common-mode filters and four fourth-order common-mode filters. The result is that each machine has two filters to pass MIL-STD-461G and two filters to comply with DO-160G. As expected, the IPM-based active rectification systems needs a larger common-mode inductance under every testing condition. It requires a second-order filter inductance that is 12-times higher than the WF-based active rectifier system. The second-order filter’s inductance is 80-times larger for DO-160G compliance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC53557.2022.9813821\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC53557.2022.9813821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conducted EMI Comparison of Two Electric Machines used in Electrified Transportation
This paper examines the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) generated by a two-level voltage-source inverter (VSI) that performs active rectification. The paper evaluates two test configurations. The first configuration uses an aerospace wound-field synchronous (WF) machine as the active-rectifier’s power source. For the second configuration, the active rectifier’s power source is an automotive interior permanent magnet (IPM) machine. Each machine provides a nominal 115Vac at a power level of 40kW, and the active rectifier converts the ac-voltage to a nominal 270Vdc. The research evaluates each active rectifier configuration against MIL-STD-461G and DO-160G, and in both cases, the active rectifier produces higher EMI when the IPM machine is the power source. Finally, this study designs and analyzes four second-order common-mode filters and four fourth-order common-mode filters. The result is that each machine has two filters to pass MIL-STD-461G and two filters to comply with DO-160G. As expected, the IPM-based active rectification systems needs a larger common-mode inductance under every testing condition. It requires a second-order filter inductance that is 12-times higher than the WF-based active rectifier system. The second-order filter’s inductance is 80-times larger for DO-160G compliance.