展示内窥镜耳部手术的YouTube®视频的可靠性和观众兴趣

H. Baran, E. Elibol
{"title":"展示内窥镜耳部手术的YouTube®视频的可靠性和观众兴趣","authors":"H. Baran, E. Elibol","doi":"10.24179/kbbbbc.2021-87187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and viewer interests of YouTube ® endoscopic ear surgery videos based on the LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool. Material and Methods: The present study evaluated 720 videos after a search on YouTube® with the keywords “endoscopic tympanoplasty, endoscopic ear surgery, endoscopic myringoplasty, and endoscopic mastoidectomy” during the time period between October 2005 to June 2020. The parameters depicting viewer interest such as the total number of views, comments, subscribers, likes, dislikes, source of videos, and video up- load date were assessed. Besides, LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool were also analyzed. Results: Among 720 videos that were compatible with the keywords of the study, only 201 (27%) of them were in agreement with the inclusion criteria. Low-quality videos com- prised 164 (81.5%) videos, and high-quality videos consisted of 37 (18.5%) videos. The video rates presented by universities were higher in the high-quality video group than the low-quality video group (29.7% vs. 9.1%). Considering the didactic voice and the presence of didactic steps, it was significantly higher in the high-quality video group compared to the low-quality video group (86.5% vs. 22.6%, p<0.001; 97.3% vs. 85.4%, p: 0.04, respectively). The higher image quality was observed in the high-quality group compared to the low-quality qual- ity group (81.1% vs. 27.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Overall, only 18.5% of YouTube ® videos were defined as high-quality videos. The videos classified in the high-quality group were presented by university hospitals, with better didactic information and voice.","PeriodicalId":157542,"journal":{"name":"Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reliability and Viewer Interest of YouTube® Videos Presenting Endoscopic Ear Procedures\",\"authors\":\"H. Baran, E. Elibol\",\"doi\":\"10.24179/kbbbbc.2021-87187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABS TRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and viewer interests of YouTube ® endoscopic ear surgery videos based on the LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool. Material and Methods: The present study evaluated 720 videos after a search on YouTube® with the keywords “endoscopic tympanoplasty, endoscopic ear surgery, endoscopic myringoplasty, and endoscopic mastoidectomy” during the time period between October 2005 to June 2020. The parameters depicting viewer interest such as the total number of views, comments, subscribers, likes, dislikes, source of videos, and video up- load date were assessed. Besides, LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool were also analyzed. Results: Among 720 videos that were compatible with the keywords of the study, only 201 (27%) of them were in agreement with the inclusion criteria. Low-quality videos com- prised 164 (81.5%) videos, and high-quality videos consisted of 37 (18.5%) videos. The video rates presented by universities were higher in the high-quality video group than the low-quality video group (29.7% vs. 9.1%). Considering the didactic voice and the presence of didactic steps, it was significantly higher in the high-quality video group compared to the low-quality video group (86.5% vs. 22.6%, p<0.001; 97.3% vs. 85.4%, p: 0.04, respectively). The higher image quality was observed in the high-quality group compared to the low-quality qual- ity group (81.1% vs. 27.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Overall, only 18.5% of YouTube ® videos were defined as high-quality videos. The videos classified in the high-quality group were presented by university hospitals, with better didactic information and voice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":157542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24179/kbbbbc.2021-87187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24179/kbbbbc.2021-87187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在基于LAP - VEGaS视频质量评估工具评估YouTube®内窥镜耳部手术视频的可靠性和观众兴趣。材料和方法:本研究对2005年10月至2020年6月期间在YouTube®上搜索关键词“内窥镜鼓室成形术、内窥镜耳部手术、内窥镜鼓膜成形术和内窥镜乳突切除术”的720个视频进行了评估。描述观看者兴趣的参数,如观看总数、评论、订阅者、喜欢、不喜欢、视频来源和视频加载日期被评估。此外,还对LAP - VEGaS视频质量评估工具进行了分析。结果:在720个符合研究关键词的视频中,只有201个(27%)视频符合纳入标准。低质量视频有164个(81.5%),高质量视频有37个(18.5%)。高质量视频组的大学录象率高于低质量视频组(29.7%比9.1%)。考虑到教学声音和教学步骤的存在,高质量视频组明显高于低质量视频组(86.5% vs. 22.6%, p<0.001;97.3% vs. 85.4%, p: 0.04)。高质量组的图像质量高于低质量组(81.1% vs. 27.4%, p<0.001)。结论:总体而言,只有18.5%的YouTube®视频被定义为高质量视频。高质量组的视频由大学医院提供,具有更好的教学信息和声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Reliability and Viewer Interest of YouTube® Videos Presenting Endoscopic Ear Procedures
ABS TRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and viewer interests of YouTube ® endoscopic ear surgery videos based on the LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool. Material and Methods: The present study evaluated 720 videos after a search on YouTube® with the keywords “endoscopic tympanoplasty, endoscopic ear surgery, endoscopic myringoplasty, and endoscopic mastoidectomy” during the time period between October 2005 to June 2020. The parameters depicting viewer interest such as the total number of views, comments, subscribers, likes, dislikes, source of videos, and video up- load date were assessed. Besides, LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool were also analyzed. Results: Among 720 videos that were compatible with the keywords of the study, only 201 (27%) of them were in agreement with the inclusion criteria. Low-quality videos com- prised 164 (81.5%) videos, and high-quality videos consisted of 37 (18.5%) videos. The video rates presented by universities were higher in the high-quality video group than the low-quality video group (29.7% vs. 9.1%). Considering the didactic voice and the presence of didactic steps, it was significantly higher in the high-quality video group compared to the low-quality video group (86.5% vs. 22.6%, p<0.001; 97.3% vs. 85.4%, p: 0.04, respectively). The higher image quality was observed in the high-quality group compared to the low-quality qual- ity group (81.1% vs. 27.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Overall, only 18.5% of YouTube ® videos were defined as high-quality videos. The videos classified in the high-quality group were presented by university hospitals, with better didactic information and voice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral Cavity Cancers: Management of Dysphagia in Partial Glossectomy Investigation of Voice Change in Stroke Individuals in the Subacute Period Compared to the Acute Period Evaluation of Mastoid and Tympanic Volumes and Hearing Levels in Male Patients with Tympanic Membrane Perforation The Potential Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Naringenin on a Histamin Induced Otitis Media with Efussion Rat Model The Effects of Smoking on Eustachian Tube Function and Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Otitis Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1