公益慈善机构的投诉处理程序:策略方法的普遍性、前因后果和结果

R. Bennett, Sharmila Savani
{"title":"公益慈善机构的投诉处理程序:策略方法的普遍性、前因后果和结果","authors":"R. Bennett, Sharmila Savani","doi":"10.1108/09604521111159799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purposes of the study are: to determine the prevalence of complaints systems within human services charities (HSCs); to identify the determinants of the adoption of complaints procedures; and to assess the outcome of strategic (rather than ad hoc) approaches to complaints management.Design/methodology/approach – A review of the literature is used to propose a model of the antecedents and outcomes of the adoption of a formal complaints‐handling system. A questionnaire survey is then conducted among a sample of 251 HSCs in the UK with annual incomes in excess of £1 million. The data are utilised to assess the prevalence of formal complaints procedures, potential antecedents to the adoption of such a system, and whether the application of strategic approaches to complaint management leads to greater managerial satisfaction with the system.Findings – The prevalence of formal complaints‐handling procedures in UK charities is increasing. Such systems are less common in smaller HSCs with little sta...","PeriodicalId":313036,"journal":{"name":"Managing Service Quality","volume":"39 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complaints‐handling procedures of human services charities: Prevalence, antecedents, and outcomes of strategic approaches\",\"authors\":\"R. Bennett, Sharmila Savani\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/09604521111159799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The purposes of the study are: to determine the prevalence of complaints systems within human services charities (HSCs); to identify the determinants of the adoption of complaints procedures; and to assess the outcome of strategic (rather than ad hoc) approaches to complaints management.Design/methodology/approach – A review of the literature is used to propose a model of the antecedents and outcomes of the adoption of a formal complaints‐handling system. A questionnaire survey is then conducted among a sample of 251 HSCs in the UK with annual incomes in excess of £1 million. The data are utilised to assess the prevalence of formal complaints procedures, potential antecedents to the adoption of such a system, and whether the application of strategic approaches to complaint management leads to greater managerial satisfaction with the system.Findings – The prevalence of formal complaints‐handling procedures in UK charities is increasing. Such systems are less common in smaller HSCs with little sta...\",\"PeriodicalId\":313036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managing Service Quality\",\"volume\":\"39 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managing Service Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111159799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Service Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111159799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的-该研究的目的是:确定人类服务慈善机构(hsc)内投诉系统的流行程度;确定采用投诉程序的决定因素;并评估投诉管理的战略(而非临时)方法的结果。设计/方法/方法-通过对文献的回顾,提出了采用正式投诉处理系统的前提和结果的模型。然后对251名年收入超过100万英镑的英国hsc样本进行问卷调查。这些数据被用来评估正式投诉程序的普及程度、采用这一制度的潜在先决条件,以及在投诉管理方面采用策略方法是否会使管理层对该制度更满意。调查结果-英国慈善机构正式投诉处理程序的普及程度正在增加。这种系统在较小的造血干细胞中不太常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Complaints‐handling procedures of human services charities: Prevalence, antecedents, and outcomes of strategic approaches
Purpose – The purposes of the study are: to determine the prevalence of complaints systems within human services charities (HSCs); to identify the determinants of the adoption of complaints procedures; and to assess the outcome of strategic (rather than ad hoc) approaches to complaints management.Design/methodology/approach – A review of the literature is used to propose a model of the antecedents and outcomes of the adoption of a formal complaints‐handling system. A questionnaire survey is then conducted among a sample of 251 HSCs in the UK with annual incomes in excess of £1 million. The data are utilised to assess the prevalence of formal complaints procedures, potential antecedents to the adoption of such a system, and whether the application of strategic approaches to complaint management leads to greater managerial satisfaction with the system.Findings – The prevalence of formal complaints‐handling procedures in UK charities is increasing. Such systems are less common in smaller HSCs with little sta...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing complexity and taking a systemic view in service research Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic The collective consumption network Beyond virtuality: from engagement platforms to engagement ecosystems Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1