{"title":"19世纪歌剧作品中的伊万·马泽帕形象","authors":"Du Ling","doi":"10.34064/khnum1-64.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of the problem. Ukraine is currently going through a period of forming its nation, so it is urgent to turn to historical figures who influenced the country’s development. The tragic life of Hetman Ivan Mazepa has been attracting the attention of both historians and artists for over 300 years. Each of the authors was drawnto something “his own” in Mazepa’s fate, so the range of artistic representations of the hetman is very wide: from traitor to hero, from warrior to philanthropist, from an ordinary person to an almost mythical creature. The question arises as to the relevance of Mazepa’s personality representation in artistic works. The purpose of the article is to study the image of the Hetman in the opera practice of the nineteenth century using historical, chronological, cultural and comparative research methods. For the first time, M. Grandval’s opera is studied in comparative chronological and general cultural contexts. Results and conclusions. In world culture, the memory of I. Mazepa has been preserved mainly because his life reflects the main themes of Romanticism: loneliness, betrayal, love, exile. These romantic features prompted most authors to modify the historical truth, so Mazepa’s portraits are very different from their prototype. Taking up the study of Mazepa’s “operatic iconography”, we found that three other operas of the same name were created in the nineteenth century, in addition to the most famous and most studied work by P. Tchaikovsky, written in 1881–1883. The first of them is the opera “Mazepa” (“Maria”) by the prominent Ukrainian composer, folklorist, and music critic Petro Sokalsky (1832–1887). The opera was never staged. The second opera “Mazepa” chronologically was written and staged in St. Petersburg in 1859 by Borys Fitinhoff, a little-known Russian composer of German descent. The third opera “Mazeppa” was written b the French composer M. Grandval (Marie Félicie Clemence de Rezet, Victoire de Grandval). By analyzing the facts of her creative life, we have clarified the main features of her compositional style, which represented the salon culture of the time and was the result of her own passion for opera. Her operatic work was quite fruitful: she created eight operas and two “lyrical poems” written together with the most famous librettists who collaborated with G. Bizet, Ch. Gounod, J. Massenet, C. Saint-Saëns. M. Grandval’s Mazepa (1892) is rightfully considered the most prominent and popular among the composer’s operas. After its premiere, the opera was performed for more than 10 years at opera houses in France. The answer to the question of why the composer of chamber and lyrical salon genres chose a large-scale historically significant image of Mazepa, on the one hand, should be sought in the high public interest in the romanticized image of the Ukrainian hetman and the related problem of power inherent in post-Napoleonic France. On the other hand, the creation of “Mazeppa” is a logical result of the internal evolution of Grandval’s operatic work from a one-act comedy to a five-act grand historical opera, which is a continuation of the established national tradition.","PeriodicalId":388829,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Interaction Between Arts, Pedagogy and the Theory and Practice of Education","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The image of Ivan Mazepa in opera works of the 19th century\",\"authors\":\"Du Ling\",\"doi\":\"10.34064/khnum1-64.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statement of the problem. Ukraine is currently going through a period of forming its nation, so it is urgent to turn to historical figures who influenced the country’s development. The tragic life of Hetman Ivan Mazepa has been attracting the attention of both historians and artists for over 300 years. Each of the authors was drawnto something “his own” in Mazepa’s fate, so the range of artistic representations of the hetman is very wide: from traitor to hero, from warrior to philanthropist, from an ordinary person to an almost mythical creature. The question arises as to the relevance of Mazepa’s personality representation in artistic works. The purpose of the article is to study the image of the Hetman in the opera practice of the nineteenth century using historical, chronological, cultural and comparative research methods. For the first time, M. Grandval’s opera is studied in comparative chronological and general cultural contexts. Results and conclusions. In world culture, the memory of I. Mazepa has been preserved mainly because his life reflects the main themes of Romanticism: loneliness, betrayal, love, exile. These romantic features prompted most authors to modify the historical truth, so Mazepa’s portraits are very different from their prototype. Taking up the study of Mazepa’s “operatic iconography”, we found that three other operas of the same name were created in the nineteenth century, in addition to the most famous and most studied work by P. Tchaikovsky, written in 1881–1883. The first of them is the opera “Mazepa” (“Maria”) by the prominent Ukrainian composer, folklorist, and music critic Petro Sokalsky (1832–1887). The opera was never staged. The second opera “Mazepa” chronologically was written and staged in St. Petersburg in 1859 by Borys Fitinhoff, a little-known Russian composer of German descent. The third opera “Mazeppa” was written b the French composer M. Grandval (Marie Félicie Clemence de Rezet, Victoire de Grandval). By analyzing the facts of her creative life, we have clarified the main features of her compositional style, which represented the salon culture of the time and was the result of her own passion for opera. Her operatic work was quite fruitful: she created eight operas and two “lyrical poems” written together with the most famous librettists who collaborated with G. Bizet, Ch. Gounod, J. Massenet, C. Saint-Saëns. M. Grandval’s Mazepa (1892) is rightfully considered the most prominent and popular among the composer’s operas. After its premiere, the opera was performed for more than 10 years at opera houses in France. The answer to the question of why the composer of chamber and lyrical salon genres chose a large-scale historically significant image of Mazepa, on the one hand, should be sought in the high public interest in the romanticized image of the Ukrainian hetman and the related problem of power inherent in post-Napoleonic France. On the other hand, the creation of “Mazeppa” is a logical result of the internal evolution of Grandval’s operatic work from a one-act comedy to a five-act grand historical opera, which is a continuation of the established national tradition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Interaction Between Arts, Pedagogy and the Theory and Practice of Education\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Interaction Between Arts, Pedagogy and the Theory and Practice of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34064/khnum1-64.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Interaction Between Arts, Pedagogy and the Theory and Practice of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34064/khnum1-64.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
问题的陈述。乌克兰目前正处于国家形成的时期,因此迫切需要向影响国家发展的历史人物求助。300多年来,Hetman Ivan Mazepa的悲惨生活一直吸引着历史学家和艺术家的关注。每一位作者都被马泽帕的命运所吸引,因此酋长的艺术表现范围非常广泛:从叛徒到英雄,从战士到慈善家,从普通人到近乎神话的生物。问题是马泽帕的个性表现在艺术作品中的相关性。本文的目的是运用历史的、时间的、文化的和比较的研究方法来研究19世纪歌剧实践中的酋长形象。这是格朗瓦尔先生的歌剧第一次在比较年代和一般文化背景下进行研究。结果和结论。在世界文化中,马泽帕的记忆被保存下来,主要是因为他的生活反映了浪漫主义的主题:孤独,背叛,爱情,流亡。这些浪漫的特征促使大多数作者修改历史真相,所以马泽帕的肖像与他们的原型有很大的不同。在研究马泽帕的“歌剧肖像学”时,我们发现,除了P.柴可夫斯基在1881-1883年创作的最著名、研究最多的作品外,还有另外三部同名歌剧创作于19世纪。其中第一部是由乌克兰著名作曲家、民俗学家和音乐评论家彼得罗·索卡尔斯基(1832-1887)创作的歌剧《玛丽亚》。这出歌剧从未上演过。第二部歌剧《马泽帕》按时间顺序于1859年在圣彼得堡由鲍里斯·菲廷霍夫创作并上演,他是一位名不见经传的德国裔俄罗斯作曲家。第三部歌剧《玛泽帕》是法国作曲家格朗瓦尔(Marie fsamuice Clemence de Rezet, Victoire de Grandval)创作的。通过对她创作生活的事实分析,明确了她的创作风格的主要特征,这种风格代表了当时的沙龙文化,是她自己对歌剧的热爱的结果。她的歌剧作品非常富有成效:她创作了八部歌剧和两首“抒情诗”,与最著名的剧作家合作,如比才,古诺,马塞内,Saint-Saëns。格朗瓦尔的《马泽帕》(1892)理所当然地被认为是作曲家的歌剧中最杰出和最受欢迎的。首演后,在法国各大歌剧院演出了10多年。室内乐和抒情沙龙流派的作曲家为什么选择了具有历史意义的大规模马泽帕形象,这一问题的答案一方面应该在公众对乌克兰酋长浪漫化形象的高度兴趣以及后拿破仑时代法国固有的权力问题中寻求。另一方面,《玛泽帕》的创作是格朗瓦尔的歌剧作品从独幕喜剧向五幕历史大歌剧内部演变的必然结果,是对既定民族传统的延续。
The image of Ivan Mazepa in opera works of the 19th century
Statement of the problem. Ukraine is currently going through a period of forming its nation, so it is urgent to turn to historical figures who influenced the country’s development. The tragic life of Hetman Ivan Mazepa has been attracting the attention of both historians and artists for over 300 years. Each of the authors was drawnto something “his own” in Mazepa’s fate, so the range of artistic representations of the hetman is very wide: from traitor to hero, from warrior to philanthropist, from an ordinary person to an almost mythical creature. The question arises as to the relevance of Mazepa’s personality representation in artistic works. The purpose of the article is to study the image of the Hetman in the opera practice of the nineteenth century using historical, chronological, cultural and comparative research methods. For the first time, M. Grandval’s opera is studied in comparative chronological and general cultural contexts. Results and conclusions. In world culture, the memory of I. Mazepa has been preserved mainly because his life reflects the main themes of Romanticism: loneliness, betrayal, love, exile. These romantic features prompted most authors to modify the historical truth, so Mazepa’s portraits are very different from their prototype. Taking up the study of Mazepa’s “operatic iconography”, we found that three other operas of the same name were created in the nineteenth century, in addition to the most famous and most studied work by P. Tchaikovsky, written in 1881–1883. The first of them is the opera “Mazepa” (“Maria”) by the prominent Ukrainian composer, folklorist, and music critic Petro Sokalsky (1832–1887). The opera was never staged. The second opera “Mazepa” chronologically was written and staged in St. Petersburg in 1859 by Borys Fitinhoff, a little-known Russian composer of German descent. The third opera “Mazeppa” was written b the French composer M. Grandval (Marie Félicie Clemence de Rezet, Victoire de Grandval). By analyzing the facts of her creative life, we have clarified the main features of her compositional style, which represented the salon culture of the time and was the result of her own passion for opera. Her operatic work was quite fruitful: she created eight operas and two “lyrical poems” written together with the most famous librettists who collaborated with G. Bizet, Ch. Gounod, J. Massenet, C. Saint-Saëns. M. Grandval’s Mazepa (1892) is rightfully considered the most prominent and popular among the composer’s operas. After its premiere, the opera was performed for more than 10 years at opera houses in France. The answer to the question of why the composer of chamber and lyrical salon genres chose a large-scale historically significant image of Mazepa, on the one hand, should be sought in the high public interest in the romanticized image of the Ukrainian hetman and the related problem of power inherent in post-Napoleonic France. On the other hand, the creation of “Mazeppa” is a logical result of the internal evolution of Grandval’s operatic work from a one-act comedy to a five-act grand historical opera, which is a continuation of the established national tradition.