使用缺陷报告在产品线中构建需求知识

R. Lutz, N. Rouquette
{"title":"使用缺陷报告在产品线中构建需求知识","authors":"R. Lutz, N. Rouquette","doi":"10.1109/MARK.2009.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a recent study of a product line, we found that the defect reports both (1) captured new requirements information and (2) implicated undocumented, tacit requirements information in the occurrence of the defects. We report four types of requirements knowledge revealed by software defect reports from integration and system testing for two products in this highdependability product line. We argue that storeandretrievebased requirements management is insufficient to avoid recurrence of these types of defects on upcoming members of the product line. We then propose the use of two mechanisms not traditionally associated with requirements management, one formal and one informal, to improve communication of these types of requirements knowledge to developers of future products in the product line. We show how the two proposed mechanisms, namely feature models extended with assumption specifications (formal) and structured anecdotes of paradigmatic productline defects (informal), can together improve propagation of the requirements knowledge exposed by these defects to future products in the product line.","PeriodicalId":143105,"journal":{"name":"2009 Second International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Defect Reports to Build Requirements Knowledge in Product Lines\",\"authors\":\"R. Lutz, N. Rouquette\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MARK.2009.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a recent study of a product line, we found that the defect reports both (1) captured new requirements information and (2) implicated undocumented, tacit requirements information in the occurrence of the defects. We report four types of requirements knowledge revealed by software defect reports from integration and system testing for two products in this highdependability product line. We argue that storeandretrievebased requirements management is insufficient to avoid recurrence of these types of defects on upcoming members of the product line. We then propose the use of two mechanisms not traditionally associated with requirements management, one formal and one informal, to improve communication of these types of requirements knowledge to developers of future products in the product line. We show how the two proposed mechanisms, namely feature models extended with assumption specifications (formal) and structured anecdotes of paradigmatic productline defects (informal), can together improve propagation of the requirements knowledge exposed by these defects to future products in the product line.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Second International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Second International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARK.2009.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Second International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARK.2009.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在最近对产品线的研究中,我们发现缺陷报告(1)捕获了新的需求信息,(2)在缺陷的发生中隐含了未记录的、隐性的需求信息。我们报告了这条高可靠性产品线中两个产品的集成和系统测试的软件缺陷报告所揭示的四种类型的需求知识。我们认为基于存储和检索的需求管理不足以避免这些类型的缺陷在即将到来的产品线成员上的重复出现。然后,我们建议使用两种传统上与需求管理无关的机制,一种是正式的,另一种是非正式的,以改善这些类型的需求知识与产品线中未来产品的开发人员的沟通。我们展示了两种被提议的机制,即用假设规范(正式的)扩展的特征模型和范例产品线缺陷的结构化轶事(非正式的),如何一起改进由这些缺陷暴露的需求知识在产品线中对未来产品的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Defect Reports to Build Requirements Knowledge in Product Lines
In a recent study of a product line, we found that the defect reports both (1) captured new requirements information and (2) implicated undocumented, tacit requirements information in the occurrence of the defects. We report four types of requirements knowledge revealed by software defect reports from integration and system testing for two products in this highdependability product line. We argue that storeandretrievebased requirements management is insufficient to avoid recurrence of these types of defects on upcoming members of the product line. We then propose the use of two mechanisms not traditionally associated with requirements management, one formal and one informal, to improve communication of these types of requirements knowledge to developers of future products in the product line. We show how the two proposed mechanisms, namely feature models extended with assumption specifications (formal) and structured anecdotes of paradigmatic productline defects (informal), can together improve propagation of the requirements knowledge exposed by these defects to future products in the product line.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Domain Knowledge Wiki for Eliciting Requirements On Presuppositions in Requirements The Papyrus Tool as an Eclipse UML2-modeling Environment for Requirements Luhmann's Slip Box -- What can we Learn from the Device for Knowledge Representation in Requirements Engineering? A Machine Learning Approach for Identifying Expert Stakeholders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1