基于节点修剪的几种特征选择方法在手写字符识别中的性能比较

Kyusik Chung, Jongmin Yoon
{"title":"基于节点修剪的几种特征选择方法在手写字符识别中的性能比较","authors":"Kyusik Chung, Jongmin Yoon","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.1997.619805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a performance comparison of several feature selection methods based on neural network node pruning. Assuming the features are extracted and presented as the inputs of a 3 layered perceptron classifier, we apply the five feature selection methods before/during/after neural network training in order to prune only input nodes of the neural network. Four of them are node pruning methods such as node saliency method, node sensitivity method, and two interactive pruning methods using different contribution measures. The last one is a statistical method based on principle component analysis (PCA). The first two of them prune input nodes during training whereas the last three do before/after network training. For gradient and upper down, left right hole concavity features, we perform several experiments of handwritten English alphabet and digit recognition with/without pruning using the five feature selection algorithms, respectively. The experimental results show that node saliency method outperforms the others.","PeriodicalId":435320,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of several feature selection methods based on node pruning in handwritten character recognition\",\"authors\":\"Kyusik Chung, Jongmin Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDAR.1997.619805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents a performance comparison of several feature selection methods based on neural network node pruning. Assuming the features are extracted and presented as the inputs of a 3 layered perceptron classifier, we apply the five feature selection methods before/during/after neural network training in order to prune only input nodes of the neural network. Four of them are node pruning methods such as node saliency method, node sensitivity method, and two interactive pruning methods using different contribution measures. The last one is a statistical method based on principle component analysis (PCA). The first two of them prune input nodes during training whereas the last three do before/after network training. For gradient and upper down, left right hole concavity features, we perform several experiments of handwritten English alphabet and digit recognition with/without pruning using the five feature selection algorithms, respectively. The experimental results show that node saliency method outperforms the others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition\",\"volume\":\"215 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.1997.619805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.1997.619805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文对几种基于神经网络节点修剪的特征选择方法进行了性能比较。假设特征被提取并作为三层感知器分类器的输入,我们在神经网络训练之前/期间/之后应用五种特征选择方法,以便只修剪神经网络的输入节点。其中4种是节点修剪方法,即节点显著性方法、节点敏感性方法和采用不同贡献度量的2种交互修剪方法。最后一种是基于主成分分析(PCA)的统计方法。它们中的前两个在训练过程中对输入节点进行修剪,而后三个在网络训练之前/之后进行修剪。对于梯度特征和上下、左右孔凹度特征,我们分别使用五种特征选择算法对手写英文字母和数字进行了修剪/不修剪的识别实验。实验结果表明,节点显著性方法优于其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance comparison of several feature selection methods based on node pruning in handwritten character recognition
The paper presents a performance comparison of several feature selection methods based on neural network node pruning. Assuming the features are extracted and presented as the inputs of a 3 layered perceptron classifier, we apply the five feature selection methods before/during/after neural network training in order to prune only input nodes of the neural network. Four of them are node pruning methods such as node saliency method, node sensitivity method, and two interactive pruning methods using different contribution measures. The last one is a statistical method based on principle component analysis (PCA). The first two of them prune input nodes during training whereas the last three do before/after network training. For gradient and upper down, left right hole concavity features, we perform several experiments of handwritten English alphabet and digit recognition with/without pruning using the five feature selection algorithms, respectively. The experimental results show that node saliency method outperforms the others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Document layout analysis based on emergent computation Offline handwritten Chinese character recognition via radical extraction and recognition Boundary normalization for recognition of non-touching non-degraded characters Words recognition using associative memory Image and text coupling for creating electronic books from manuscripts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1