密度感知压缩人群感知

Xiaohong Hao, Liwen Xu, N. Lane, Xin Liu, T. Moscibroda
{"title":"密度感知压缩人群感知","authors":"Xiaohong Hao, Liwen Xu, N. Lane, Xin Liu, T. Moscibroda","doi":"10.1145/3055031.3055081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowdsensing systems collect large-scale sensor data from mobile devices to provide a wide-area view of phenomena including traffic, noise and air pollution. Because such data often exhibits sparse structure, it is natural to apply compressive sensing (CS) for data sampling and recovery. However in practice, crowd participants are often distributed highly unevenly across the sensing area, and thus the numbers of observations collected over different areas may vary wildly -- an issue we call density disparity. Density disparity leads to inaccuracy in low density areas, and potentially undermines the recovery performance if conventional compressive sensing is applied directly, which equally treats data from areas of different density.To address this challenge, we propose a probabilistic accuracy estimator, based on which we devise two recovery algorithms: Threshold Recovery (TR) and Weighted Recovery (WR). As general-purpose recovery algorithms, TR and WR improve the performance of CS in the scenarios with density disparity, and also provide better guarantees in terms of $\\ell_2$-norm accuracy compared with conventional CS recovery algorithms. We also conduct extensive experiments based on synthetic and real-life datasets. Our results show that TR/WR typically reduce $\\ell_2$-norm error by more than 60\\% compared to state-of-the-art baselines.","PeriodicalId":228318,"journal":{"name":"2017 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN)","volume":"304 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Density-Aware Compressive CrowdSensing\",\"authors\":\"Xiaohong Hao, Liwen Xu, N. Lane, Xin Liu, T. Moscibroda\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3055031.3055081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Crowdsensing systems collect large-scale sensor data from mobile devices to provide a wide-area view of phenomena including traffic, noise and air pollution. Because such data often exhibits sparse structure, it is natural to apply compressive sensing (CS) for data sampling and recovery. However in practice, crowd participants are often distributed highly unevenly across the sensing area, and thus the numbers of observations collected over different areas may vary wildly -- an issue we call density disparity. Density disparity leads to inaccuracy in low density areas, and potentially undermines the recovery performance if conventional compressive sensing is applied directly, which equally treats data from areas of different density.To address this challenge, we propose a probabilistic accuracy estimator, based on which we devise two recovery algorithms: Threshold Recovery (TR) and Weighted Recovery (WR). As general-purpose recovery algorithms, TR and WR improve the performance of CS in the scenarios with density disparity, and also provide better guarantees in terms of $\\\\ell_2$-norm accuracy compared with conventional CS recovery algorithms. We also conduct extensive experiments based on synthetic and real-life datasets. Our results show that TR/WR typically reduce $\\\\ell_2$-norm error by more than 60\\\\% compared to state-of-the-art baselines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN)\",\"volume\":\"304 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3055031.3055081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3055031.3055081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

众感系统从移动设备上收集大规模传感器数据,提供交通、噪音和空气污染等现象的广域视图。由于这类数据通常表现为稀疏结构,因此应用压缩感知(CS)进行数据采样和恢复是很自然的。然而,在实践中,人群参与者在传感区域的分布通常非常不均匀,因此在不同区域收集的观察数据数量可能相差很大——我们称之为密度差异。密度差会导致低密度区域的不准确性,如果直接应用传统的压缩感知,则可能会影响恢复性能,因为传统压缩感知对不同密度区域的数据进行同等处理。为了解决这一挑战,我们提出了一个概率精度估计器,并在此基础上设计了两种恢复算法:阈值恢复(TR)和加权恢复(WR)。作为通用恢复算法,TR和WR提高了CS在密度差异场景下的性能,并且与传统CS恢复算法相比,在$\ell_2$范数精度方面提供了更好的保证。我们还根据合成的和真实的数据集进行广泛的实验。我们的结果表明,与最先进的基线相比,TR/WR通常将$\ell_2$-规范误差降低60%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Density-Aware Compressive CrowdSensing
Crowdsensing systems collect large-scale sensor data from mobile devices to provide a wide-area view of phenomena including traffic, noise and air pollution. Because such data often exhibits sparse structure, it is natural to apply compressive sensing (CS) for data sampling and recovery. However in practice, crowd participants are often distributed highly unevenly across the sensing area, and thus the numbers of observations collected over different areas may vary wildly -- an issue we call density disparity. Density disparity leads to inaccuracy in low density areas, and potentially undermines the recovery performance if conventional compressive sensing is applied directly, which equally treats data from areas of different density.To address this challenge, we propose a probabilistic accuracy estimator, based on which we devise two recovery algorithms: Threshold Recovery (TR) and Weighted Recovery (WR). As general-purpose recovery algorithms, TR and WR improve the performance of CS in the scenarios with density disparity, and also provide better guarantees in terms of $\ell_2$-norm accuracy compared with conventional CS recovery algorithms. We also conduct extensive experiments based on synthetic and real-life datasets. Our results show that TR/WR typically reduce $\ell_2$-norm error by more than 60\% compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coresets for Differentially Private K-Means Clustering and Applications to Privacy in Mobile Sensor Networks SurfaceVibe: Vibration-Based Tap & Swipe Tracking on Ubiquitous Surfaces 3D Through-Wall Imaging with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using WiFi MinHash Hierarchy for Privacy Preserving Trajectory Sensing and Query VideoMec: A Metadata-Enhanced Crowdsourcing System for Mobile Videos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1