关于使用多个版本的软件测试的性能

S. Brilliant, J. Knight, P. Ammann
{"title":"关于使用多个版本的软件测试的性能","authors":"S. Brilliant, J. Knight, P. Ammann","doi":"10.1109/FTCS.1990.89395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors present analytic models of the performance of comparison checking (also called back-to-back testing and automatic testing), and they use these models to investigate its effectiveness. A Markov model is used to analyze the observation time required for a test system to uncover a fault using comparison checking. A basis for evaluation is provided by developing a similar Markov model for the analysis of ideal checking, i.e. using a perfect (through unrealizable) oracle. Also presented is a model of the effect of comparison checking on a version's failure probability as testing proceeds. Again, comparison checking is evaluated against ideal checking. The analyses show that comparison checking is a powerful and effective technique.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":174189,"journal":{"name":"[1990] Digest of Papers. Fault-Tolerant Computing: 20th International Symposium","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the performance of software testing using multiple versions\",\"authors\":\"S. Brilliant, J. Knight, P. Ammann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FTCS.1990.89395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors present analytic models of the performance of comparison checking (also called back-to-back testing and automatic testing), and they use these models to investigate its effectiveness. A Markov model is used to analyze the observation time required for a test system to uncover a fault using comparison checking. A basis for evaluation is provided by developing a similar Markov model for the analysis of ideal checking, i.e. using a perfect (through unrealizable) oracle. Also presented is a model of the effect of comparison checking on a version's failure probability as testing proceeds. Again, comparison checking is evaluated against ideal checking. The analyses show that comparison checking is a powerful and effective technique.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":174189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1990] Digest of Papers. Fault-Tolerant Computing: 20th International Symposium\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1990] Digest of Papers. Fault-Tolerant Computing: 20th International Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1990.89395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1990] Digest of Papers. Fault-Tolerant Computing: 20th International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1990.89395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

作者提出了比较检查(也称为背靠背测试和自动测试)性能的分析模型,并使用这些模型来研究其有效性。利用马尔可夫模型分析了测试系统通过比较检查发现故障所需的观测时间。通过开发一个类似的马尔可夫模型来分析理想检查,即使用一个完美的(通过不可实现的)oracle,为评估提供了基础。此外,本文还提出了一个模型,说明在测试过程中,比较检查对版本失败概率的影响。同样,比较检查是根据理想检查进行评估的。分析表明,比较检查是一种强大而有效的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the performance of software testing using multiple versions
The authors present analytic models of the performance of comparison checking (also called back-to-back testing and automatic testing), and they use these models to investigate its effectiveness. A Markov model is used to analyze the observation time required for a test system to uncover a fault using comparison checking. A basis for evaluation is provided by developing a similar Markov model for the analysis of ideal checking, i.e. using a perfect (through unrealizable) oracle. Also presented is a model of the effect of comparison checking on a version's failure probability as testing proceeds. Again, comparison checking is evaluated against ideal checking. The analyses show that comparison checking is a powerful and effective technique.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A software based approach to achieving optimal performance for signature control flow checking Using certification trails to achieve software fault tolerance Techniques for building dependable distributed systems: multi-version software testing Optimized synthesis of self-testable finite state machines Loss-tolerance for electronic wallets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1