面向现实模型的表征:多学科图形度量的评价

Gábor Szárnyas, Z. Kővári, Ágnes Salánki, Dániel Varró
{"title":"面向现实模型的表征:多学科图形度量的评价","authors":"Gábor Szárnyas, Z. Kővári, Ágnes Salánki, Dániel Varró","doi":"10.1145/2976767.2976786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Custom generators of graph-based models are used in MDE for many purposes such as functional testing and performance benchmarking of modeling environments to ensure the correctness and scalability of tools. However, while existing generators may generate large models in increasing size, these models are claimed to be simple and synthetic, which hinders their credibility for industrial and research benchmarking purposes. But how to characterize a realistic model used in software and systems engineering? This question is investigated in the paper by collecting over 17 different widely used graph metrics taken from other disciplines (e.g. network theory) and evaluating them on 83 instance models originating from six modeling domains. Our preliminary results show that certain metrics are similar within a domain, but differ greatly between domains, which makes them suitable input for future instance model generators to derive more realistic models.","PeriodicalId":179690,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the characterization of realistic models: evaluation of multidisciplinary graph metrics\",\"authors\":\"Gábor Szárnyas, Z. Kővári, Ágnes Salánki, Dániel Varró\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2976767.2976786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Custom generators of graph-based models are used in MDE for many purposes such as functional testing and performance benchmarking of modeling environments to ensure the correctness and scalability of tools. However, while existing generators may generate large models in increasing size, these models are claimed to be simple and synthetic, which hinders their credibility for industrial and research benchmarking purposes. But how to characterize a realistic model used in software and systems engineering? This question is investigated in the paper by collecting over 17 different widely used graph metrics taken from other disciplines (e.g. network theory) and evaluating them on 83 instance models originating from six modeling domains. Our preliminary results show that certain metrics are similar within a domain, but differ greatly between domains, which makes them suitable input for future instance model generators to derive more realistic models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2976767.2976786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2976767.2976786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

基于图的模型的自定义生成器在MDE中用于许多目的,例如建模环境的功能测试和性能基准测试,以确保工具的正确性和可伸缩性。然而,虽然现有的发电机可能会产生越来越大的模型,但这些模型被认为是简单和综合的,这阻碍了它们在工业和研究基准方面的可信度。但是如何描述软件和系统工程中使用的现实模型呢?本文通过收集来自其他学科(例如网络理论)的17种不同的广泛使用的图形度量来研究这个问题,并在来自六个建模领域的83个实例模型上对它们进行评估。我们的初步结果表明,某些指标在一个领域内是相似的,但在不同的领域之间差异很大,这使得它们成为未来实例模型生成器的合适输入,以派生出更真实的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards the characterization of realistic models: evaluation of multidisciplinary graph metrics
Custom generators of graph-based models are used in MDE for many purposes such as functional testing and performance benchmarking of modeling environments to ensure the correctness and scalability of tools. However, while existing generators may generate large models in increasing size, these models are claimed to be simple and synthetic, which hinders their credibility for industrial and research benchmarking purposes. But how to characterize a realistic model used in software and systems engineering? This question is investigated in the paper by collecting over 17 different widely used graph metrics taken from other disciplines (e.g. network theory) and evaluating them on 83 instance models originating from six modeling domains. Our preliminary results show that certain metrics are similar within a domain, but differ greatly between domains, which makes them suitable input for future instance model generators to derive more realistic models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Model transformation for end-user modelers with VMTL Automated refactoring of ATL model transformations: a search-based approach ThingML: a language and code generation framework for heterogeneous targets Automatic generation of detailed flight plans from high-level mission descriptions Towards mutation analysis for use cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1