患者权利评估

Hayrettin Kurt
{"title":"患者权利评估","authors":"Hayrettin Kurt","doi":"10.54049/taad.1139385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the traditional form of life in pre-Enlightenment societies, human rights was less valuable than the interests of society. Therefore, the individual could only be an object for the construction of the higher values ​​of the society. By breaking down all the bonds of traditional society, modernism also clarified the position of man before society or clan: the individual. From now on the individual, as being the social values ​​itself, could has rights and freedoms before the law. In accordance with the traditional classification of classical rights, patient rights have also taken its place in the range of values. The individual, who is the subject of law, has become a value itself with modernism as a social being whose roots go back to the state of nature. With its historicalness extending from the state of nature to the rules of law, the individual has also become the source of legitimacy for a series of rights inherent in human beings. This legitimacy has also become the subject of rights like human life, environment and health as well as the moral values. In this context, patient rights are one of the legitimate, actual and natural rights of the modern individual. Patients’ rights don’t mean an abstract order of objects but the set of rights which embodied with a set of concrete, objective, protective improving legal rules. On the other hand, it should be considered as an obligation to analyze new approaches related to patient rights within the scope of modern legal rules.","PeriodicalId":106262,"journal":{"name":"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment on Patient Right\",\"authors\":\"Hayrettin Kurt\",\"doi\":\"10.54049/taad.1139385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the traditional form of life in pre-Enlightenment societies, human rights was less valuable than the interests of society. Therefore, the individual could only be an object for the construction of the higher values ​​of the society. By breaking down all the bonds of traditional society, modernism also clarified the position of man before society or clan: the individual. From now on the individual, as being the social values ​​itself, could has rights and freedoms before the law. In accordance with the traditional classification of classical rights, patient rights have also taken its place in the range of values. The individual, who is the subject of law, has become a value itself with modernism as a social being whose roots go back to the state of nature. With its historicalness extending from the state of nature to the rules of law, the individual has also become the source of legitimacy for a series of rights inherent in human beings. This legitimacy has also become the subject of rights like human life, environment and health as well as the moral values. In this context, patient rights are one of the legitimate, actual and natural rights of the modern individual. Patients’ rights don’t mean an abstract order of objects but the set of rights which embodied with a set of concrete, objective, protective improving legal rules. On the other hand, it should be considered as an obligation to analyze new approaches related to patient rights within the scope of modern legal rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1139385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1139385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据启蒙运动前社会的传统生活方式,人权不如社会利益有价值。因此,个人只能是构建社会更高价值的对象。通过打破传统社会的一切束缚,现代主义也明确了人在社会或宗族面前的地位:个体。从现在起,作为社会价值本身的个人可以在法律面前享有权利和自由。按照传统的经典权利分类,患者权利也在价值范围中占有一席之地。作为法律主体的个人,在现代主义中成为一种价值本身,成为一种社会存在,其根源可以追溯到自然状态。随着其历史性从自然状态延伸到法治,个人也成为人类固有的一系列权利的合法性来源。这种合法性也成为人的生命、环境和健康等权利以及道德价值观的主题。在这种背景下,患者权利是现代个人合法的、实际的和自然的权利之一。患者权利不是抽象的客体秩序,而是一套具体的、客观的、保护性的、完善性的法律规则所体现的权利。另一方面,在现代法律规则范围内分析与患者权利有关的新途径应被视为一种义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment on Patient Right
According to the traditional form of life in pre-Enlightenment societies, human rights was less valuable than the interests of society. Therefore, the individual could only be an object for the construction of the higher values ​​of the society. By breaking down all the bonds of traditional society, modernism also clarified the position of man before society or clan: the individual. From now on the individual, as being the social values ​​itself, could has rights and freedoms before the law. In accordance with the traditional classification of classical rights, patient rights have also taken its place in the range of values. The individual, who is the subject of law, has become a value itself with modernism as a social being whose roots go back to the state of nature. With its historicalness extending from the state of nature to the rules of law, the individual has also become the source of legitimacy for a series of rights inherent in human beings. This legitimacy has also become the subject of rights like human life, environment and health as well as the moral values. In this context, patient rights are one of the legitimate, actual and natural rights of the modern individual. Patients’ rights don’t mean an abstract order of objects but the set of rights which embodied with a set of concrete, objective, protective improving legal rules. On the other hand, it should be considered as an obligation to analyze new approaches related to patient rights within the scope of modern legal rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Legal Situation of Unaccompanied Minors in Turkish Law The Authority of ICSID Tribunals for Suspension of Turkish Criminal Proceedings CEZAYA DEĞER HAKSIZLIĞIN FORMEL TESPİTİNDE PARÇA HAREKET TEORİSİ (TEIL-/ZWISCHENAKTSTHEORIE) VE HUKUKUMUZ BAKIMINDAN UYGULANABİLİRLİĞİ Evaluation of Provisions of Article 15 of the Cadastre Law Titled Partition and Partial Acaustion within the Framework of the Principle ANAYASA MAHKEMESİNİN TMK m. 187’NİN İPTALİNE İLİŞKİN KARARININ ANALİZİ VE DÜZENLEME ÖNERİSİ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1