眼不见心不烦?在Covid-19期间,实验者参与儿童在线实验

Madeleine Ingham
{"title":"眼不见心不烦?在Covid-19期间,实验者参与儿童在线实验","authors":"Madeleine Ingham","doi":"10.53841/bpspag.2021.1.118.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The initial plan for my MSc research – which explores if metacognitive measures can predict accuracy in children – was to recruit child participants in schools. However, Covid-19 meant that I needed to pivot to online testing. Children (aged four to eight) completed a memory task while I guided and recorded the session via Zoom. Here, I reflect on my experiences and consider empirical evidence about experimenter effects in virtual studies. Specifically, should the experimenter have their camera turned on or off? Research suggests there are advantages and disadvantages for both methods, presenting a novel challenge for conducting virtual studies with children.","PeriodicalId":166013,"journal":{"name":"PsyPag Quarterly","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out of sight out of mind? Experimenter presence in an online experiment with children during Covid-19\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine Ingham\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpspag.2021.1.118.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The initial plan for my MSc research – which explores if metacognitive measures can predict accuracy in children – was to recruit child participants in schools. However, Covid-19 meant that I needed to pivot to online testing. Children (aged four to eight) completed a memory task while I guided and recorded the session via Zoom. Here, I reflect on my experiences and consider empirical evidence about experimenter effects in virtual studies. Specifically, should the experimenter have their camera turned on or off? Research suggests there are advantages and disadvantages for both methods, presenting a novel challenge for conducting virtual studies with children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PsyPag Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PsyPag Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspag.2021.1.118.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PsyPag Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspag.2021.1.118.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我的硕士研究——探索元认知测量是否能预测儿童的准确性——最初的计划是在学校招募儿童参与者。然而,新冠肺炎意味着我需要转向在线测试。孩子们(4到8岁)完成了一项记忆任务,而我则通过Zoom指导和记录了这个过程。在这里,我反思了我的经验,并考虑了关于虚拟研究中实验者效应的经验证据。具体来说,实验者应该打开还是关闭他们的相机?研究表明,这两种方法各有利弊,这对对儿童进行虚拟研究提出了新的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Out of sight out of mind? Experimenter presence in an online experiment with children during Covid-19
The initial plan for my MSc research – which explores if metacognitive measures can predict accuracy in children – was to recruit child participants in schools. However, Covid-19 meant that I needed to pivot to online testing. Children (aged four to eight) completed a memory task while I guided and recorded the session via Zoom. Here, I reflect on my experiences and consider empirical evidence about experimenter effects in virtual studies. Specifically, should the experimenter have their camera turned on or off? Research suggests there are advantages and disadvantages for both methods, presenting a novel challenge for conducting virtual studies with children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positive expressive writing interventions for improving wellbeing Psychosis: An ever-changing conceptualisation Sadness, sorrow, or despair: Improving existing tasks assessing emotional granularity An autoethnographic exploration of anxiety in a cognitive assessment during a clinical neuropsychology placement Evaluation of training effectiveness in simulation-based cricothyroidotomy programme for evidence-informed hospital management: An executive summary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1