使用当前最先进的DME的APNT优化DME/DME网络的调查:地面站网络,精度和容量

Euiho Kim
{"title":"使用当前最先进的DME的APNT优化DME/DME网络的调查:地面站网络,精度和容量","authors":"Euiho Kim","doi":"10.1109/PLANS.2012.6236876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An optimized DME/DME network is one of the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) proposed Alternative Position, Navigation, and Timing (APNT) architectures. In comparison to other FAA-proposed APNT architectures, namely DME pseudolite network and passive Wide-Area Multilateration, airline operators find DME/DME more attractive for navigation back-up, as this solution requires no change to avionics used by nearly all commercial aircraft, thus reducing equipage costs to private companies. It is also advantageous because the absolute DME range measurements likely require a lower number of stations than the other architectures, thereby minimizing the cost to the public of installing new infrastructure. However, the insufficient range accuracy of the traditional DME (DME/N) has caused hesitation in actively pursuing this solution. U.S. and ICAO DME range accuracy standards of 0.2 nm is insufficient to support RNAV/RNP 0.3 nm operations, the performance the FAA has defined as needed for APNT. However, these standards are based on antiquated DME designs and have failed to account for advancements in both aircraft and ground station radio designs and performance. Recent flight inspections of DME range determined that the accuracy of the current state-of-the-art DME (DME/N) ground transponder is much better than 0.2 nm using current-day DME avionics. This enhanced accuracy presents an opportunity to leverage this technology and the network of DME ground stations for APNT. The DMEs in most stations in the National Airspace System (NAS) have been in service for more than 20 years and are due for replacement. It is thought that replacing DME legacy radios with modern state-of-the-art DMEs could support RNAV/RNP 0.3 operations, as well as optimize coverage with minimal addition to the DME network. This supposition leads to the feasibility study of the proposed APNT optimized DME/DME network. Using the expected range accuracy of the state-of-the-art DMEs, this paper investigates the feasibility of this proposed APNT solution by answering the following two key questions. First, what would be the optimal DME/DME ground station network that enables RNAV/RNP 0.3 operation for navigation and surveillance? Second, will the DME/DME network have sufficient capacity to support high density air traffic such as the 2020 LA basin model? The paper provides preliminary research results, by evaluating selected areas of the continental United States. Recommendations for network operation are based on the sample areas.","PeriodicalId":282304,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of APNT optimized DME/DME network using current state-of-the-art DMEs: Ground station network, accuracy, and capacity\",\"authors\":\"Euiho Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PLANS.2012.6236876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An optimized DME/DME network is one of the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) proposed Alternative Position, Navigation, and Timing (APNT) architectures. In comparison to other FAA-proposed APNT architectures, namely DME pseudolite network and passive Wide-Area Multilateration, airline operators find DME/DME more attractive for navigation back-up, as this solution requires no change to avionics used by nearly all commercial aircraft, thus reducing equipage costs to private companies. It is also advantageous because the absolute DME range measurements likely require a lower number of stations than the other architectures, thereby minimizing the cost to the public of installing new infrastructure. However, the insufficient range accuracy of the traditional DME (DME/N) has caused hesitation in actively pursuing this solution. U.S. and ICAO DME range accuracy standards of 0.2 nm is insufficient to support RNAV/RNP 0.3 nm operations, the performance the FAA has defined as needed for APNT. However, these standards are based on antiquated DME designs and have failed to account for advancements in both aircraft and ground station radio designs and performance. Recent flight inspections of DME range determined that the accuracy of the current state-of-the-art DME (DME/N) ground transponder is much better than 0.2 nm using current-day DME avionics. This enhanced accuracy presents an opportunity to leverage this technology and the network of DME ground stations for APNT. The DMEs in most stations in the National Airspace System (NAS) have been in service for more than 20 years and are due for replacement. It is thought that replacing DME legacy radios with modern state-of-the-art DMEs could support RNAV/RNP 0.3 operations, as well as optimize coverage with minimal addition to the DME network. This supposition leads to the feasibility study of the proposed APNT optimized DME/DME network. Using the expected range accuracy of the state-of-the-art DMEs, this paper investigates the feasibility of this proposed APNT solution by answering the following two key questions. First, what would be the optimal DME/DME ground station network that enables RNAV/RNP 0.3 operation for navigation and surveillance? Second, will the DME/DME network have sufficient capacity to support high density air traffic such as the 2020 LA basin model? The paper provides preliminary research results, by evaluating selected areas of the continental United States. Recommendations for network operation are based on the sample areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2012.6236876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2012.6236876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

优化的DME/DME网络是美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)提出的替代位置、导航和授时(APNT)架构之一。与faa提出的其他APNT架构(即DME伪卫星网络和无源广域多分频)相比,航空公司运营商发现DME/DME在导航备份方面更具吸引力,因为该解决方案无需更改几乎所有商用飞机使用的航空电子设备,从而降低了私营公司的设备成本。它的另一个优势是,与其他体系结构相比,绝对DME范围测量可能需要更少的站点数量,从而最大限度地降低了公众安装新基础设施的成本。然而,传统的DME (DME/N)测距精度不足,导致人们在积极寻求这种解决方案时犹豫不决。美国和国际民航组织的DME射程精度标准为0.2 nm,不足以支持RNAV/RNP 0.3 nm的操作,而FAA已经定义了APNT所需的性能。然而,这些标准是基于过时的DME设计,未能考虑到飞机和地面站无线电设计和性能的进步。最近对DME范围的飞行检查确定,目前最先进的DME (DME/N)地面应答器的精度远远优于使用当前DME航空电子设备的0.2 nm。这种精度的提高为APNT提供了利用该技术和DME地面站网络的机会。国家空域系统(NAS)中大多数台站的DMEs已经服役超过20年,并且应该进行更换。人们认为,用现代最先进的DME取代DME的传统无线电可以支持RNAV/RNP 0.3操作,并以最小的DME网络增加优化覆盖范围。这一假设导致了所提出的APNT优化DME/DME网络的可行性研究。利用最先进的DMEs的预期距离精度,本文通过回答以下两个关键问题来研究该APNT解决方案的可行性。首先,使RNAV/RNP 0.3运行用于导航和监视的最佳DME/DME地面站网络是什么?其次,DME/DME网络是否有足够的能力支持高密度空中交通,如2020年LA盆地模型?本文通过评价美国大陆的选定地区,提供了初步的研究结果。网络操作的建议基于示例区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of APNT optimized DME/DME network using current state-of-the-art DMEs: Ground station network, accuracy, and capacity
An optimized DME/DME network is one of the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) proposed Alternative Position, Navigation, and Timing (APNT) architectures. In comparison to other FAA-proposed APNT architectures, namely DME pseudolite network and passive Wide-Area Multilateration, airline operators find DME/DME more attractive for navigation back-up, as this solution requires no change to avionics used by nearly all commercial aircraft, thus reducing equipage costs to private companies. It is also advantageous because the absolute DME range measurements likely require a lower number of stations than the other architectures, thereby minimizing the cost to the public of installing new infrastructure. However, the insufficient range accuracy of the traditional DME (DME/N) has caused hesitation in actively pursuing this solution. U.S. and ICAO DME range accuracy standards of 0.2 nm is insufficient to support RNAV/RNP 0.3 nm operations, the performance the FAA has defined as needed for APNT. However, these standards are based on antiquated DME designs and have failed to account for advancements in both aircraft and ground station radio designs and performance. Recent flight inspections of DME range determined that the accuracy of the current state-of-the-art DME (DME/N) ground transponder is much better than 0.2 nm using current-day DME avionics. This enhanced accuracy presents an opportunity to leverage this technology and the network of DME ground stations for APNT. The DMEs in most stations in the National Airspace System (NAS) have been in service for more than 20 years and are due for replacement. It is thought that replacing DME legacy radios with modern state-of-the-art DMEs could support RNAV/RNP 0.3 operations, as well as optimize coverage with minimal addition to the DME network. This supposition leads to the feasibility study of the proposed APNT optimized DME/DME network. Using the expected range accuracy of the state-of-the-art DMEs, this paper investigates the feasibility of this proposed APNT solution by answering the following two key questions. First, what would be the optimal DME/DME ground station network that enables RNAV/RNP 0.3 operation for navigation and surveillance? Second, will the DME/DME network have sufficient capacity to support high density air traffic such as the 2020 LA basin model? The paper provides preliminary research results, by evaluating selected areas of the continental United States. Recommendations for network operation are based on the sample areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimation of deterministic and stochastic IMU error parameters Technique for MAT analysis and performance assessment of P2P acquisition engines GNSS spoofing detection in handheld receivers based on signal spatial correlation ASF quality assurance for eLoran Evolution to modernized GNSS ionoshperic scintillation and TEC monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1