COVID-19环境响应研究中反应性的文献计量学综述

David An
{"title":"COVID-19环境响应研究中反应性的文献计量学综述","authors":"David An","doi":"10.1684/ers.2023.1695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 has been a worldwide emergency and continues to spread in the environment. It is crucial to keep following up on current solutions to this pandemic and think about future epidemic prevention. Herein, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed to examine different facets of research output on the environmental response against COVID-19. The relevant bibliographic dataset was queried in PubMed for literature published since the COVID-19 outbreak. Python program was used to extract the metadata information from the dataset toward the research production in environmental response to the pandemic. Key points covered in the analysis included contribution of authorship and country to the scientific output, strength of collaborative network, and main topics of research themes. Regarding contributions, the USA was the most productive country in terms of publications and authorships, followed by China, the UK, Italy, and India. Using activity index as a relative indicator for research reactivity, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and India, followed by the USA and the UK, were highly reactive to the environmental and COVID-19 studies. For research collaboration, the USA demonstrated the highest level of domestic independence and Saudi Arabia had an extremely high level of international collaborations. The global research production could be covered in 20 major topics and grouped into four themes as control and prevention, public healthcare, disease research, and COVID-19 impacts. Overall, this study visualized global research reactivity and interactive networks in environmental response to COVID-19 and provided a basis of utilizing Python program in rapid literature review for strategizing scientific solutions to future epidemic prevention.Copyright © 2023 John Libbey Eurotext. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":440648,"journal":{"name":"Environnement, Risques & Santé","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometric overview of reactivity in research on environmental response to COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"David An\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/ers.2023.1695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"COVID-19 has been a worldwide emergency and continues to spread in the environment. It is crucial to keep following up on current solutions to this pandemic and think about future epidemic prevention. Herein, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed to examine different facets of research output on the environmental response against COVID-19. The relevant bibliographic dataset was queried in PubMed for literature published since the COVID-19 outbreak. Python program was used to extract the metadata information from the dataset toward the research production in environmental response to the pandemic. Key points covered in the analysis included contribution of authorship and country to the scientific output, strength of collaborative network, and main topics of research themes. Regarding contributions, the USA was the most productive country in terms of publications and authorships, followed by China, the UK, Italy, and India. Using activity index as a relative indicator for research reactivity, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and India, followed by the USA and the UK, were highly reactive to the environmental and COVID-19 studies. For research collaboration, the USA demonstrated the highest level of domestic independence and Saudi Arabia had an extremely high level of international collaborations. The global research production could be covered in 20 major topics and grouped into four themes as control and prevention, public healthcare, disease research, and COVID-19 impacts. Overall, this study visualized global research reactivity and interactive networks in environmental response to COVID-19 and provided a basis of utilizing Python program in rapid literature review for strategizing scientific solutions to future epidemic prevention.Copyright © 2023 John Libbey Eurotext. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environnement, Risques & Santé\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environnement, Risques & Santé\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/ers.2023.1695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environnement, Risques & Santé","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ers.2023.1695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19已成为全球紧急情况,并继续在环境中传播。至关重要的是,要继续跟进当前应对这一流行病的解决办法,并考虑未来的防疫工作。本文进行了全面的文献计量分析,以检查针对COVID-19的环境反应的研究产出的不同方面。在PubMed中查询相关书目数据集,查找自2019冠状病毒病暴发以来发表的文献。使用Python程序从数据集中提取元数据信息,用于大流行环境响应的研究生产。分析的重点包括作者和国家对科学产出的贡献、合作网络的强度以及研究主题的主要主题。就贡献而言,就出版物和作者数量而言,美国是生产力最高的国家,其次是中国、英国、意大利和印度。将活动指数作为研究反应性的相对指标,巴基斯坦、沙特阿拉伯和印度,其次是美国和英国,对环境和COVID-19研究的反应性很高。在研究合作方面,美国表现出最高的国内独立水平,沙特阿拉伯具有极高的国际合作水平。全球研究成果可涵盖20个主要主题,并分为控制和预防、公共卫生、疾病研究和COVID-19影响四个主题。总体而言,本研究可视化了COVID-19环境响应中的全球研究反应性和互动网络,为利用Python程序快速查阅文献,制定未来疫情预防的科学解决方案提供了基础。版权所有©2023 John Libbey Eurotext。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bibliometric overview of reactivity in research on environmental response to COVID-19
COVID-19 has been a worldwide emergency and continues to spread in the environment. It is crucial to keep following up on current solutions to this pandemic and think about future epidemic prevention. Herein, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed to examine different facets of research output on the environmental response against COVID-19. The relevant bibliographic dataset was queried in PubMed for literature published since the COVID-19 outbreak. Python program was used to extract the metadata information from the dataset toward the research production in environmental response to the pandemic. Key points covered in the analysis included contribution of authorship and country to the scientific output, strength of collaborative network, and main topics of research themes. Regarding contributions, the USA was the most productive country in terms of publications and authorships, followed by China, the UK, Italy, and India. Using activity index as a relative indicator for research reactivity, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and India, followed by the USA and the UK, were highly reactive to the environmental and COVID-19 studies. For research collaboration, the USA demonstrated the highest level of domestic independence and Saudi Arabia had an extremely high level of international collaborations. The global research production could be covered in 20 major topics and grouped into four themes as control and prevention, public healthcare, disease research, and COVID-19 impacts. Overall, this study visualized global research reactivity and interactive networks in environmental response to COVID-19 and provided a basis of utilizing Python program in rapid literature review for strategizing scientific solutions to future epidemic prevention.Copyright © 2023 John Libbey Eurotext. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environnement, risque et santé : une recherche compartimentée, heureusement des chercheurs motivés ! What are these household pests? Twentieth century household pest control in Switzerland : The example of the Hagners, a father and son in Lausanne Les « nuisibles » dans l’habitat urbain Unis pour un air sain : Observatoire romand et tessinois de la qualité de l’air intérieur (ORTQAI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1