估算市场风险溢价

S. Mayfield
{"title":"估算市场风险溢价","authors":"S. Mayfield","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.195569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a methodology for estimating the market risk premium based on the underlying process governing the level of market volatility. My model provides a test for a structural shift in the historical risk premium and an unbiased estimate of its value. I provide evidence of a structural shift in the volatility process following the 1930s that implies an upward bias in ex post realized returns during the subsequent period. Controlling for this bias, my estimate of the market risk premium for the period after 1940 is 5.9% over the yield on Treasury bills. My model also provides a lower-bound on forward-looking estimates of the current risk premium of 4.2% over the yield on Treasury bills.","PeriodicalId":180033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Abstracts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"141","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the Market Risk Premium\",\"authors\":\"S. Mayfield\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.195569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a methodology for estimating the market risk premium based on the underlying process governing the level of market volatility. My model provides a test for a structural shift in the historical risk premium and an unbiased estimate of its value. I provide evidence of a structural shift in the volatility process following the 1930s that implies an upward bias in ex post realized returns during the subsequent period. Controlling for this bias, my estimate of the market risk premium for the period after 1940 is 5.9% over the yield on Treasury bills. My model also provides a lower-bound on forward-looking estimates of the current risk premium of 4.2% over the yield on Treasury bills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Abstracts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"141\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.195569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.195569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 141

摘要

本文提供了一种基于控制市场波动水平的潜在过程来估计市场风险溢价的方法。我的模型为历史风险溢价的结构性变化提供了检验,并对其价值进行了无偏估计。我提供的证据表明,在20世纪30年代之后,波动性过程发生了结构性转变,这意味着在随后的一段时间里,事后实现回报会出现上升倾向。在控制了这种偏差后,我估计1940年以后的市场风险溢价比国库券收益率高出5.9%。我的模型还提供了当前风险溢价相对于国库券收益率4.2%的前瞻性估计的下限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating the Market Risk Premium
This paper provides a methodology for estimating the market risk premium based on the underlying process governing the level of market volatility. My model provides a test for a structural shift in the historical risk premium and an unbiased estimate of its value. I provide evidence of a structural shift in the volatility process following the 1930s that implies an upward bias in ex post realized returns during the subsequent period. Controlling for this bias, my estimate of the market risk premium for the period after 1940 is 5.9% over the yield on Treasury bills. My model also provides a lower-bound on forward-looking estimates of the current risk premium of 4.2% over the yield on Treasury bills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managerial Risk-Taking Incentives and Executive Stock Option Repricing: A Study of Us Casino Executives Determinants of Revenue Reporting Practices for Internet Firms Differences in Commercial Database Reported Earnings: Implications for Empirical Research The Association between Stock/Compensation Mix and Earnings Usefulness Evidence from Auditors About Managers' and Auditors' Earnings-Management Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1