{"title":"崇高和“旁观者的份额”:朱尼厄斯,鲁本斯,伦勃朗","authors":"M. A. Weststeijn","doi":"10.5092/JHNA.2016.8.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the innovative elements in Franciscus Junius’s treatise The Painting of the Ancients (four editions, 1637–94) was the first discussion of Longinus’s concept of the sublime in the context of the figurative arts. Junius’s translation of his own treatise into English (1639) prepared the ground for the importance of the sublime in British aesthetics. Yet scrutiny of the underlying conceptions of The Painting of the Ancients reveals that his interpretation of this ancient concept was idiosyncratic. His interest in Longinus was not motivated by philosophy but rather by the painterly illusionism perfected in Netherlandish studios. This essay explores how Junius used the sublime to explain the “beholder’s share” in the artist’s evocation of a virtual reality. It points out the practical context in which his theory arose and how it relates to extant works, focusing on Rubens’s The Andrians and Rembrandt’s The Blinding of Samson.","PeriodicalId":104162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Sublime and the 'Beholder’s Share': Junius, Rubens, Rembrandt\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Weststeijn\",\"doi\":\"10.5092/JHNA.2016.8.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the innovative elements in Franciscus Junius’s treatise The Painting of the Ancients (four editions, 1637–94) was the first discussion of Longinus’s concept of the sublime in the context of the figurative arts. Junius’s translation of his own treatise into English (1639) prepared the ground for the importance of the sublime in British aesthetics. Yet scrutiny of the underlying conceptions of The Painting of the Ancients reveals that his interpretation of this ancient concept was idiosyncratic. His interest in Longinus was not motivated by philosophy but rather by the painterly illusionism perfected in Netherlandish studios. This essay explores how Junius used the sublime to explain the “beholder’s share” in the artist’s evocation of a virtual reality. It points out the practical context in which his theory arose and how it relates to extant works, focusing on Rubens’s The Andrians and Rembrandt’s The Blinding of Samson.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5092/JHNA.2016.8.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5092/JHNA.2016.8.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
弗朗西斯·朱尼乌斯(francis Junius)的著作《古人之画》(the Painting of the Ancients)(四版,1637-94)的创新元素之一是首次讨论了朗吉努斯在具象艺术背景下的崇高概念。朱尼厄斯将自己的论文翻译成英文(1639年),为崇高在英国美学中的重要性奠定了基础。然而,仔细审视《上古画》的潜在概念,就会发现他对这一古老概念的诠释是独特的。他对朗吉纳斯的兴趣并非源于哲学,而是源于荷兰画室中完美的绘画幻觉主义。这篇文章探讨了朱尼厄斯如何用崇高来解释艺术家对虚拟现实的唤起中的“旁观者的份额”。它指出了他的理论产生的实际背景,以及它与现存作品的关系,重点是鲁本斯的《安德里亚人》和伦勃朗的《参孙的失明》。
The Sublime and the 'Beholder’s Share': Junius, Rubens, Rembrandt
One of the innovative elements in Franciscus Junius’s treatise The Painting of the Ancients (four editions, 1637–94) was the first discussion of Longinus’s concept of the sublime in the context of the figurative arts. Junius’s translation of his own treatise into English (1639) prepared the ground for the importance of the sublime in British aesthetics. Yet scrutiny of the underlying conceptions of The Painting of the Ancients reveals that his interpretation of this ancient concept was idiosyncratic. His interest in Longinus was not motivated by philosophy but rather by the painterly illusionism perfected in Netherlandish studios. This essay explores how Junius used the sublime to explain the “beholder’s share” in the artist’s evocation of a virtual reality. It points out the practical context in which his theory arose and how it relates to extant works, focusing on Rubens’s The Andrians and Rembrandt’s The Blinding of Samson.