COVID - 19患者的输血需求:一项观察性前瞻性单中心研究

U. La Rocca, G. Giovannetti, F. Maldarelli, Mirella Farinelli, M. Piazzolla, A. Angeloni, F. Pugliese, S. Coluzzi
{"title":"COVID - 19患者的输血需求:一项观察性前瞻性单中心研究","authors":"U. La Rocca, G. Giovannetti, F. Maldarelli, Mirella Farinelli, M. Piazzolla, A. Angeloni, F. Pugliese, S. Coluzzi","doi":"10.1111/tme.12886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, In 2019 a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2), caused by a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), was described in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China, which then rapidly spread and evolved into a pandemic. As of 5 July 2021, 183,298,109 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and 3,971,687 deaths all over the world have been reported. Italy is one of the most involved countries, reaching 4,259,909 confirmed cases (as of 2 July 2021) and 127,566 deaths. Clinical presentations of SARS-CoV-2 are various. Most infected patients are asymptomatic, others develop mild symptoms like dry cough, sore throat, and fever, with a spontaneous resolution. Some cases evolve into pulmonary oedema, severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and septic shock resulting in organ failure. Most-used treatments are chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, claimed to block viral entry into cells and have immunomodulatory effects, lopinavir/ritonavir and other antivirals, corticosteroids, anti-cytokines or immunomodulatory agents (tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody IL-6 receptor antagonist), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to limit the risk of an associated coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The WHO has published guidelines to manage the blood supply in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The guidance underlines the role of blood services in assessing, planning, and responding to the outbreak. In fact, lockdown and social distancing may lead to limited blood resources. Moreover, while blood transfusion requirement may decrease as the health care system is focused on treating COVID-19 patients, thus deferring other clinical interventions, transfusions will still be necessary for emergency situations and to support COVID-19 patients with severe sepsis. Critical patients may develop anaemia as a consequence of multifactorial and complex pathogenesis. Phlebotomies and other surgical procedures, coagulopathies, pathogen-associated haemolysis, hypoadrenalism, and nutritional deficiencies, as well as the concomitant administration of different drugs, may cause Haemoglobin (Hb) to drop. Decreased erythropoietin production and/or activity could be the consequence of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-α. The risk in COVID-19 patients is even higher due to the well-known pro-haemolytic effect of hydroxychloroquine, especially in G6PDHdeficient individuals, even if there are few findings supporting the necessity for G6PDH deficiency screening before starting this drug. Here we report the results of a retrospective evaluation of blood transfusion supply in patients (pts) affected by COVID-19, admitted to Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, during the epidemic outbreak, taking into account treatments, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory parameters, especially those related to RBC transfusion. From the 1 March 2020 to 27 April 2020, 71 patients with COVID-19 infection were admitted to Policlinico Umberto I, in the departments of Infectious Disease or in the intensive care unit (ICU). Forty-seven of them, required transfusion support; 30 patients were males, 17 were females; median age was 72 (38–95). Sixteen out of 47 (34%) had blood group type A. Forty-five patients required RBC, with a median of 3 transfusions each (1–20); nine patients received plasma support, with a median of 4 transfusions (3–24). Five out of the 45 patients who required RBC, required plasma supply as well; two patients received only plasma. Two patients received platelets, RBC and plasma (see Figure 1D). Thirty-two patients out of 47 (68%) showed comorbidities such as hypertension and cardiovascular diseases (18 patients), diabetes mellitus (nine patients), oncological/haematological diseases (six patients), autoimmune diseases (three patients). Twenty-two out of the 47 patients who required transfusion, were admitted to ICU due to severe clinical disease. All of them were treated with the same therapy, consisting of anti-viral drugs, LMWH, and hydroxychloroquine (400mg/day); one patient did not receive hydroxychloroquine due to G6PDH deficiency. Considering the pro-haemolytic effect of hydroxychloroquine, we monitored haemolytic markers in patients treated with RBC transfusions, observing the following median values: Hb 12.3 g/dl (7.4–16.6) at admission; Hb 7.5 g/dl (6.7–11) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 383 UI/L (271–781, n.v. 125–225) at the time of first transfusion. Both direct and indirect antiglobulin tests were negative in all patients, thus excluding immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia. The median time between COVID-19 diagnosis and transfusion requirement was 13 days (0–33); all patients showed increasing LDH values starting at a median time of 5 days (1–11) after COVID-19 diagnosis and first hydroxychloroquine administration, with a median peak value of 706 IU/L (301–2805). In more detail, in Figure 1 we report the trend of values of Hb and LDH of the 22 patients (Figure 1A), and day-by-day LDH and Hb profiles and transfusion requirements of two representative patients. The first patient (Figure 1B) was a 42-year-old female affected by hypertension and autoimmune hepatitis treated with steroids. In 6 days, Hb and LDH values reached 9.8 g/dl and 1000 IU/L, respectively (at admission, Hb 13 g/dl, and LDH 282 UI/L). Fourteen days after, LDH reached 2285 UI/L value. In the same time frame, with the increasing levels Received: 9 June 2020 Revised: 5 February 2022 Accepted: 24 April 2022","PeriodicalId":442504,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood transfusion needs in COVID‐19 patients: An observational prospective unicentric study\",\"authors\":\"U. La Rocca, G. Giovannetti, F. Maldarelli, Mirella Farinelli, M. Piazzolla, A. Angeloni, F. Pugliese, S. Coluzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tme.12886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear Editor, In 2019 a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2), caused by a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), was described in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China, which then rapidly spread and evolved into a pandemic. As of 5 July 2021, 183,298,109 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and 3,971,687 deaths all over the world have been reported. Italy is one of the most involved countries, reaching 4,259,909 confirmed cases (as of 2 July 2021) and 127,566 deaths. Clinical presentations of SARS-CoV-2 are various. Most infected patients are asymptomatic, others develop mild symptoms like dry cough, sore throat, and fever, with a spontaneous resolution. Some cases evolve into pulmonary oedema, severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and septic shock resulting in organ failure. Most-used treatments are chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, claimed to block viral entry into cells and have immunomodulatory effects, lopinavir/ritonavir and other antivirals, corticosteroids, anti-cytokines or immunomodulatory agents (tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody IL-6 receptor antagonist), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to limit the risk of an associated coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The WHO has published guidelines to manage the blood supply in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The guidance underlines the role of blood services in assessing, planning, and responding to the outbreak. In fact, lockdown and social distancing may lead to limited blood resources. Moreover, while blood transfusion requirement may decrease as the health care system is focused on treating COVID-19 patients, thus deferring other clinical interventions, transfusions will still be necessary for emergency situations and to support COVID-19 patients with severe sepsis. Critical patients may develop anaemia as a consequence of multifactorial and complex pathogenesis. Phlebotomies and other surgical procedures, coagulopathies, pathogen-associated haemolysis, hypoadrenalism, and nutritional deficiencies, as well as the concomitant administration of different drugs, may cause Haemoglobin (Hb) to drop. Decreased erythropoietin production and/or activity could be the consequence of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-α. The risk in COVID-19 patients is even higher due to the well-known pro-haemolytic effect of hydroxychloroquine, especially in G6PDHdeficient individuals, even if there are few findings supporting the necessity for G6PDH deficiency screening before starting this drug. Here we report the results of a retrospective evaluation of blood transfusion supply in patients (pts) affected by COVID-19, admitted to Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, during the epidemic outbreak, taking into account treatments, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory parameters, especially those related to RBC transfusion. From the 1 March 2020 to 27 April 2020, 71 patients with COVID-19 infection were admitted to Policlinico Umberto I, in the departments of Infectious Disease or in the intensive care unit (ICU). Forty-seven of them, required transfusion support; 30 patients were males, 17 were females; median age was 72 (38–95). Sixteen out of 47 (34%) had blood group type A. Forty-five patients required RBC, with a median of 3 transfusions each (1–20); nine patients received plasma support, with a median of 4 transfusions (3–24). Five out of the 45 patients who required RBC, required plasma supply as well; two patients received only plasma. Two patients received platelets, RBC and plasma (see Figure 1D). Thirty-two patients out of 47 (68%) showed comorbidities such as hypertension and cardiovascular diseases (18 patients), diabetes mellitus (nine patients), oncological/haematological diseases (six patients), autoimmune diseases (three patients). Twenty-two out of the 47 patients who required transfusion, were admitted to ICU due to severe clinical disease. All of them were treated with the same therapy, consisting of anti-viral drugs, LMWH, and hydroxychloroquine (400mg/day); one patient did not receive hydroxychloroquine due to G6PDH deficiency. Considering the pro-haemolytic effect of hydroxychloroquine, we monitored haemolytic markers in patients treated with RBC transfusions, observing the following median values: Hb 12.3 g/dl (7.4–16.6) at admission; Hb 7.5 g/dl (6.7–11) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 383 UI/L (271–781, n.v. 125–225) at the time of first transfusion. Both direct and indirect antiglobulin tests were negative in all patients, thus excluding immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia. The median time between COVID-19 diagnosis and transfusion requirement was 13 days (0–33); all patients showed increasing LDH values starting at a median time of 5 days (1–11) after COVID-19 diagnosis and first hydroxychloroquine administration, with a median peak value of 706 IU/L (301–2805). In more detail, in Figure 1 we report the trend of values of Hb and LDH of the 22 patients (Figure 1A), and day-by-day LDH and Hb profiles and transfusion requirements of two representative patients. The first patient (Figure 1B) was a 42-year-old female affected by hypertension and autoimmune hepatitis treated with steroids. In 6 days, Hb and LDH values reached 9.8 g/dl and 1000 IU/L, respectively (at admission, Hb 13 g/dl, and LDH 282 UI/L). Fourteen days after, LDH reached 2285 UI/L value. In the same time frame, with the increasing levels Received: 9 June 2020 Revised: 5 February 2022 Accepted: 24 April 2022\",\"PeriodicalId\":442504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"193 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.12886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.12886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年,在中国湖北省武汉市发现了一种由新型冠状病毒(2019- ncov)引起的严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS-CoV-2),随后迅速传播并演变成一场大流行。截至2021年7月5日,全世界共报告了183,298,109例冠状病毒病(COVID-19)确诊病例和3,971,687例死亡病例。意大利是疫情最严重的国家之一,确诊病例达4 259 909例(截至2021年7月2日),死亡人数达127 566人。SARS-CoV-2的临床表现多种多样。大多数感染患者无症状,其他患者出现干咳、喉咙痛和发烧等轻微症状,可自行消退。有些病例发展为肺水肿、严重肺炎、急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和感染性休克导致器官衰竭。最常用的治疗方法是氯喹和羟氯喹,声称可以阻止病毒进入细胞并具有免疫调节作用,洛匹那韦/利托那韦和其他抗病毒药物,皮质类固醇,抗细胞因子或免疫调节剂(托珠单抗,单克隆抗体IL-6受体拮抗剂),低分子肝素(LMWH),以限制相关凝血病和弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)的风险。世卫组织发布了应对COVID-19大流行的血液供应管理指南。该指南强调了血液服务机构在评估、规划和应对疫情方面的作用。事实上,封锁和保持社交距离可能会导致血液资源有限。此外,虽然输血需求可能会减少,因为卫生保健系统的重点是治疗COVID-19患者,从而推迟了其他临床干预措施,但在紧急情况下和支持COVID-19严重败血症患者时,输血仍然是必要的。由于多因素和复杂的发病机制,危重患者可能发生贫血。静脉切开术和其他外科手术、凝血功能障碍、病原体相关溶血、肾上腺素减退和营养缺乏,以及同时服用不同药物,都可能导致血红蛋白(Hb)下降。促红细胞生成素产生和/或活性降低可能是炎性细胞因子如IL-1和TNF-α的结果。由于羟基氯喹具有众所周知的促溶血作用,COVID-19患者的风险甚至更高,特别是在G6PDH缺乏的个体中,尽管很少有研究结果支持在开始使用这种药物之前进行G6PDH缺乏筛查的必要性。在此,我们报告了一项回顾性评估结果,该结果是在疫情爆发期间,考虑到治疗、合并症、临床和实验室参数,特别是与红细胞输血有关的参数,在罗马萨皮恩扎大学(Sapienza University of Rome) Umberto I医院收治的COVID-19患者(pts)的输血供应。从2020年3月1日至2020年4月27日,共有71名COVID-19感染患者入住翁贝托第一医院、传染病科或重症监护病房。其中47人需要输血支持;男性30例,女性17例;中位年龄为72岁(38-95岁)。47例患者中有16例(34%)为a型血。45例患者需要红细胞,平均每次输血3次(1-20次);9例患者接受血浆支持,平均输血4次(3-24次)。45名患者中有5名需要红细胞,也需要血浆供应;两名患者仅接受血浆治疗。2例患者接受血小板、红细胞和血浆(见图1D)。47例患者中有32例(68%)出现合并症,如高血压和心血管疾病(18例)、糖尿病(9例)、肿瘤/血液疾病(6例)、自身免疫性疾病(3例)。在47例需要输血的患者中,有22例因严重的临床疾病而入住ICU。所有患者均给予相同的治疗,包括抗病毒药物、低分子肝素和羟氯喹(400mg/天);1例患者因G6PDH缺乏而未接受羟氯喹治疗。考虑到羟氯喹的促溶血作用,我们监测了接受红细胞输注的患者的溶血标志物,观察到以下中位值:入院时Hb为12.3 g/dl (7.4-16.6);首次输血时Hb为7.5 g/dl(6.7-11),乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)为383 UI/L (271-781, n.v 125-225)。所有患者的直接和间接抗球蛋白试验均为阴性,因此排除了免疫介导的溶血性贫血。从COVID-19诊断到输血需求的中位时间为13天(0 ~ 33天);所有患者的LDH值均在确诊后第一次羟氯喹给药后5天(1 ~ 11天)开始升高,峰值中位数为706 IU/L(301 ~ 2805)。 更详细地说,在图1中,我们报告了22名患者的Hb和LDH值的趋势(图1A),以及两名代表性患者的每日LDH和Hb概况和输血需求。第一位患者(图1B)是一名42岁女性,患有高血压和自身免疫性肝炎,接受类固醇治疗。6天后,Hb和LDH值分别达到9.8 g/dl和1000 IU/L(入院时Hb为13 g/dl, LDH为282 UI/L)。14天后,LDH达到2285 UI/L。收稿时间:2020年6月9日修稿时间:2022年2月5日收稿时间:2022年4月24日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blood transfusion needs in COVID‐19 patients: An observational prospective unicentric study
Dear Editor, In 2019 a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2), caused by a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), was described in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China, which then rapidly spread and evolved into a pandemic. As of 5 July 2021, 183,298,109 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and 3,971,687 deaths all over the world have been reported. Italy is one of the most involved countries, reaching 4,259,909 confirmed cases (as of 2 July 2021) and 127,566 deaths. Clinical presentations of SARS-CoV-2 are various. Most infected patients are asymptomatic, others develop mild symptoms like dry cough, sore throat, and fever, with a spontaneous resolution. Some cases evolve into pulmonary oedema, severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and septic shock resulting in organ failure. Most-used treatments are chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, claimed to block viral entry into cells and have immunomodulatory effects, lopinavir/ritonavir and other antivirals, corticosteroids, anti-cytokines or immunomodulatory agents (tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody IL-6 receptor antagonist), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to limit the risk of an associated coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The WHO has published guidelines to manage the blood supply in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The guidance underlines the role of blood services in assessing, planning, and responding to the outbreak. In fact, lockdown and social distancing may lead to limited blood resources. Moreover, while blood transfusion requirement may decrease as the health care system is focused on treating COVID-19 patients, thus deferring other clinical interventions, transfusions will still be necessary for emergency situations and to support COVID-19 patients with severe sepsis. Critical patients may develop anaemia as a consequence of multifactorial and complex pathogenesis. Phlebotomies and other surgical procedures, coagulopathies, pathogen-associated haemolysis, hypoadrenalism, and nutritional deficiencies, as well as the concomitant administration of different drugs, may cause Haemoglobin (Hb) to drop. Decreased erythropoietin production and/or activity could be the consequence of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-α. The risk in COVID-19 patients is even higher due to the well-known pro-haemolytic effect of hydroxychloroquine, especially in G6PDHdeficient individuals, even if there are few findings supporting the necessity for G6PDH deficiency screening before starting this drug. Here we report the results of a retrospective evaluation of blood transfusion supply in patients (pts) affected by COVID-19, admitted to Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, during the epidemic outbreak, taking into account treatments, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory parameters, especially those related to RBC transfusion. From the 1 March 2020 to 27 April 2020, 71 patients with COVID-19 infection were admitted to Policlinico Umberto I, in the departments of Infectious Disease or in the intensive care unit (ICU). Forty-seven of them, required transfusion support; 30 patients were males, 17 were females; median age was 72 (38–95). Sixteen out of 47 (34%) had blood group type A. Forty-five patients required RBC, with a median of 3 transfusions each (1–20); nine patients received plasma support, with a median of 4 transfusions (3–24). Five out of the 45 patients who required RBC, required plasma supply as well; two patients received only plasma. Two patients received platelets, RBC and plasma (see Figure 1D). Thirty-two patients out of 47 (68%) showed comorbidities such as hypertension and cardiovascular diseases (18 patients), diabetes mellitus (nine patients), oncological/haematological diseases (six patients), autoimmune diseases (three patients). Twenty-two out of the 47 patients who required transfusion, were admitted to ICU due to severe clinical disease. All of them were treated with the same therapy, consisting of anti-viral drugs, LMWH, and hydroxychloroquine (400mg/day); one patient did not receive hydroxychloroquine due to G6PDH deficiency. Considering the pro-haemolytic effect of hydroxychloroquine, we monitored haemolytic markers in patients treated with RBC transfusions, observing the following median values: Hb 12.3 g/dl (7.4–16.6) at admission; Hb 7.5 g/dl (6.7–11) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 383 UI/L (271–781, n.v. 125–225) at the time of first transfusion. Both direct and indirect antiglobulin tests were negative in all patients, thus excluding immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia. The median time between COVID-19 diagnosis and transfusion requirement was 13 days (0–33); all patients showed increasing LDH values starting at a median time of 5 days (1–11) after COVID-19 diagnosis and first hydroxychloroquine administration, with a median peak value of 706 IU/L (301–2805). In more detail, in Figure 1 we report the trend of values of Hb and LDH of the 22 patients (Figure 1A), and day-by-day LDH and Hb profiles and transfusion requirements of two representative patients. The first patient (Figure 1B) was a 42-year-old female affected by hypertension and autoimmune hepatitis treated with steroids. In 6 days, Hb and LDH values reached 9.8 g/dl and 1000 IU/L, respectively (at admission, Hb 13 g/dl, and LDH 282 UI/L). Fourteen days after, LDH reached 2285 UI/L value. In the same time frame, with the increasing levels Received: 9 June 2020 Revised: 5 February 2022 Accepted: 24 April 2022
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood transfusion needs in COVID‐19 patients: An observational prospective unicentric study A critical contribution in a time of crisis: Examining motivations and deterrents to COVID‐19 convalescent plasma donation and future donation intentions among prospective Canadian donors Utility of pre‐operative haemoglobin concentration to guide peri‐operative blood tests for hip and knee arthroplasty: A decision curve analysis Trust and distrust: Identifying recruitment targets for ethnic minority blood donors Diagnostic accuracy of Abbott Architect Assay as a screening tool for human T‐cell leukaemia virus type‐1 and type‐2 infection in a London teaching hospital with a large solid organ transplant centre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1