难辨梭菌培养基对难辨梭菌分离的评价

J. Yim, S. Hwang, Myungsook Kim, H. Lim, Saeam Shin, Hae-Sun Chung, Heejung Kim, Kyungwon Lee
{"title":"难辨梭菌培养基对难辨梭菌分离的评价","authors":"J. Yim, S. Hwang, Myungsook Kim, H. Lim, Saeam Shin, Hae-Sun Chung, Heejung Kim, Kyungwon Lee","doi":"10.5145/KJCM.2012.15.3.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clostridium difficile is the main etiologic agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and the most common cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea. Recently, the incidence of C. difficile infections (CDI) has increased and new highly virulent C. difficile strains have emerged. Therefore, accurate and rapid diagnosis is needed. We compared the results of using chromID C. difficile (chromID CD, bioMerieux, France) with the conventional C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; BD, USA) for the isolation of C. difficile. Methods: A total of 738 stool specimens of suspected CDI patients at the Severance Hospital from July to August 2011 were inoculated onto CDSA. Among them, 104 stool specimens revealed colonies on CDSA that were then re-inoculated onto chromID CD. The stool samples were stored at −20 o C until the time of the re-inoculation. Cultured agars were interpreted after 24 hrs and 48 hrs, respectively. Species identification was performed on the basis of colony characteristics on agar plates as well as the ATB 32A system (API System SA, France). Results: The recovery rates of CDSA and chromID CD were 30.1% and 77.5% after 24 hrs, and 77.5% and 98.6% after 48 hrs, respectively. All of the C. difficile isolates were recovered as typical gray/black colonies on chromID CD. Conclusion: The performance of chromID CD for the isolation of C. difficile was better than that of conventional CDSA. The chromID CD could provide easy and sensitive detection of C. difficile even after 24hrs of incubation. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2012; 15:88-91)","PeriodicalId":143093,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a ChromID C. difficile Agar for the Isolation of Clostridium difficile\",\"authors\":\"J. Yim, S. Hwang, Myungsook Kim, H. Lim, Saeam Shin, Hae-Sun Chung, Heejung Kim, Kyungwon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5145/KJCM.2012.15.3.88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Clostridium difficile is the main etiologic agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and the most common cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea. Recently, the incidence of C. difficile infections (CDI) has increased and new highly virulent C. difficile strains have emerged. Therefore, accurate and rapid diagnosis is needed. We compared the results of using chromID C. difficile (chromID CD, bioMerieux, France) with the conventional C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; BD, USA) for the isolation of C. difficile. Methods: A total of 738 stool specimens of suspected CDI patients at the Severance Hospital from July to August 2011 were inoculated onto CDSA. Among them, 104 stool specimens revealed colonies on CDSA that were then re-inoculated onto chromID CD. The stool samples were stored at −20 o C until the time of the re-inoculation. Cultured agars were interpreted after 24 hrs and 48 hrs, respectively. Species identification was performed on the basis of colony characteristics on agar plates as well as the ATB 32A system (API System SA, France). Results: The recovery rates of CDSA and chromID CD were 30.1% and 77.5% after 24 hrs, and 77.5% and 98.6% after 48 hrs, respectively. All of the C. difficile isolates were recovered as typical gray/black colonies on chromID CD. Conclusion: The performance of chromID CD for the isolation of C. difficile was better than that of conventional CDSA. The chromID CD could provide easy and sensitive detection of C. difficile even after 24hrs of incubation. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2012; 15:88-91)\",\"PeriodicalId\":143093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2012.15.3.88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2012.15.3.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:艰难梭菌是抗生素相关性腹泻的主要病原,也是医院获得性腹泻的最常见原因。近年来,艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的发病率有所增加,并且出现了新的高毒力艰难梭菌菌株。因此,需要准确、快速的诊断。我们比较了使用chromID艰难梭菌(chromID CD, bioMerieux, France)和传统艰难梭菌选择性琼脂(CDSA;BD,美国)分离艰难梭菌。方法:对2011年7 - 8月Severance医院疑似CDI患者粪便标本738例进行CDSA接种。其中104份粪便标本在CDSA上发现菌落,然后将其重新接种到chromID CD上。粪便标本在- 20℃保存,直到再次接种。培养琼脂分别在24 h和48 h后进行解释。根据琼脂平板和ATB 32A系统(法国API system SA)的菌落特征进行物种鉴定。结果:24h后CDSA和chromID CD的回收率分别为30.1%和77.5%,48h后分别为77.5%和98.6%。所有艰难梭菌分离株在chromID - CD上均为典型的灰色/黑色菌落。结论:chromID - CD对艰难梭菌的分离效果优于常规CDSA。即使孵育24小时,chromID CD也能方便、灵敏地检测出难辨梭菌。中华临床微生物学杂志2012;15:88 - 91)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a ChromID C. difficile Agar for the Isolation of Clostridium difficile
Background: Clostridium difficile is the main etiologic agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and the most common cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea. Recently, the incidence of C. difficile infections (CDI) has increased and new highly virulent C. difficile strains have emerged. Therefore, accurate and rapid diagnosis is needed. We compared the results of using chromID C. difficile (chromID CD, bioMerieux, France) with the conventional C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; BD, USA) for the isolation of C. difficile. Methods: A total of 738 stool specimens of suspected CDI patients at the Severance Hospital from July to August 2011 were inoculated onto CDSA. Among them, 104 stool specimens revealed colonies on CDSA that were then re-inoculated onto chromID CD. The stool samples were stored at −20 o C until the time of the re-inoculation. Cultured agars were interpreted after 24 hrs and 48 hrs, respectively. Species identification was performed on the basis of colony characteristics on agar plates as well as the ATB 32A system (API System SA, France). Results: The recovery rates of CDSA and chromID CD were 30.1% and 77.5% after 24 hrs, and 77.5% and 98.6% after 48 hrs, respectively. All of the C. difficile isolates were recovered as typical gray/black colonies on chromID CD. Conclusion: The performance of chromID CD for the isolation of C. difficile was better than that of conventional CDSA. The chromID CD could provide easy and sensitive detection of C. difficile even after 24hrs of incubation. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2012; 15:88-91)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity of Integrons Carrying blaVIM-2 Cassette in Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. A Case of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Caused by Arcanobacterium haemolyticum and Streptococcus agalactiae Haemophilus parainfluenzae Infective Endocarditis Confirmed by 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis from Culture Negative Tissue An Unusual Feature of Malaria: Exflagellated Microgametes of Malarial Parasites in Human Peripheral Blood Lung Abscess and Bacteremia Caused by Neisseria flavescens and Streptococcus sanguis in Patient with Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1