单一研究的危险

Promise Nduku, Nkululeko Tshabalala, Moshidi Putuka, Zafeer Ravat, Laurenz Langer
{"title":"单一研究的危险","authors":"Promise Nduku, Nkululeko Tshabalala, Moshidi Putuka, Zafeer Ravat, Laurenz Langer","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198866244.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter outlines how taking a more systematic approach to developing responsive evidence bases that can inform research, policy, and practice on community health worker (CHW) training in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) supports the provision of more effective and equitable CHW programmes. It also explores methodologies and tools to develop such evidence bases and how these can and have been used to inform decision-making. We argue that by focusing on single primary studies rather than the combined body of evidence, research and practice on the training of CHWs in LMICs is overlooking systemic patterns in the evidence base. Decisions on which types of training programmes to implement in LMICs are often based on single evaluations of programmes conducted out of context or informed by general principles for workplace-based learning. Better matching research and practice needs with the available evidence base will facilitate a more effective translation of knowledge on the training of CHWs into practice and policy decisions.","PeriodicalId":287785,"journal":{"name":"Training for Community Health","volume":"135D 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Danger of a Single Study\",\"authors\":\"Promise Nduku, Nkululeko Tshabalala, Moshidi Putuka, Zafeer Ravat, Laurenz Langer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198866244.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter outlines how taking a more systematic approach to developing responsive evidence bases that can inform research, policy, and practice on community health worker (CHW) training in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) supports the provision of more effective and equitable CHW programmes. It also explores methodologies and tools to develop such evidence bases and how these can and have been used to inform decision-making. We argue that by focusing on single primary studies rather than the combined body of evidence, research and practice on the training of CHWs in LMICs is overlooking systemic patterns in the evidence base. Decisions on which types of training programmes to implement in LMICs are often based on single evaluations of programmes conducted out of context or informed by general principles for workplace-based learning. Better matching research and practice needs with the available evidence base will facilitate a more effective translation of knowledge on the training of CHWs into practice and policy decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Training for Community Health\",\"volume\":\"135D 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Training for Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866244.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Training for Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866244.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章概述了如何采取更系统的方法来开发响应性证据基础,为低收入和中等收入国家社区卫生工作者(CHW)培训的研究、政策和实践提供信息,从而支持提供更有效和公平的CHW规划。它还探讨了开发这种证据基础的方法和工具,以及如何能够和已经利用这些方法和工具为决策提供信息。我们认为,通过关注单一的主要研究而不是综合证据,中低收入国家卫生保健员培训的研究和实践忽视了证据基础中的系统模式。关于在低收入和中等收入国家实施哪种培训方案的决定,往往是基于对脱离背景进行的方案的单一评估,或根据工作场所学习的一般原则作出的。更好地将研究和实践需要与现有的证据基础相匹配,将有助于更有效地将有关卫生工作者培训的知识转化为实践和政策决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Danger of a Single Study
This chapter outlines how taking a more systematic approach to developing responsive evidence bases that can inform research, policy, and practice on community health worker (CHW) training in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) supports the provision of more effective and equitable CHW programmes. It also explores methodologies and tools to develop such evidence bases and how these can and have been used to inform decision-making. We argue that by focusing on single primary studies rather than the combined body of evidence, research and practice on the training of CHWs in LMICs is overlooking systemic patterns in the evidence base. Decisions on which types of training programmes to implement in LMICs are often based on single evaluations of programmes conducted out of context or informed by general principles for workplace-based learning. Better matching research and practice needs with the available evidence base will facilitate a more effective translation of knowledge on the training of CHWs into practice and policy decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methods of Evaluation of Community Health Worker Training Mobile Phones and the Uses of Learning in a Training Intervention for Kenyan Community Health Workers Learning How Not to Train the Community Out of the Community Health Workers Designing Pedagogically-Driven Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for Community Health Workers Digital Health Interventions for Community Health Worker Training, Ongoing Education, and Supportive Supervision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1