阿片类药物剂量风险、临床医生和患者特征,以及对慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类药物处方建议的依从性。

Q3 Medicine Journal of opioid management Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.5055/jom.0815
Christa Coleman, Robert P Lennon, James M Robinson, Wen-Jan Tuan, Nalini Sehgal, Aleksandra E Zgierska
{"title":"阿片类药物剂量风险、临床医生和患者特征,以及对慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类药物处方建议的依从性。","authors":"Christa Coleman, Robert P Lennon, James M Robinson, Wen-Jan Tuan, Nalini Sehgal, Aleksandra E Zgierska","doi":"10.5055/jom.0815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess associations between morphine-equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of opioids, clinician and patient characteristics, and prescriber adherence to guidelines for long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) and to elucidate potential relationships associated with increased-risk opioid prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic health system's 33 primary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults (≥18 years old) prescribed LTOT (10 + outpatient prescriptions in the past year) for CNCP.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Electronic health record data on prescribed opioids (for MEDD), clinician/patient characteristics, and adherence rates to LTOT guideline-concordant recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,738 patients were eligible, 61.6 percent Lower, 15.7 percent Moderate, and 22.7 percent Higher Risk MEDD (<50, 50-89, and ≥90 mg/day, respectively). Higher MEDD correlated (p < 0.001) with Medicare insurance, current cigarette smoking, higher pain intensity and interference scores, and the presence of opioid use disorder diagnoses. Male clinicians more frequently prescribed (p < 0.001) and male patients were more likely to be prescribed (p < 0.001) higher MEDD compared to their female counterparts. Higher Risk MEDD was associated with higher coprescribed benzodiazepines (p = 0.015), lower depression screening (p = 0.048), urine drug testing (p = 0.003), comparable active treatment agreement (p = 0.189), opioid misuse risk screening (p = 0.619), and prescription drug monitoring checks (p = 0.203).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study documented that higher MEDD was associated with risks of worse health outcomes without improved adherence to opioid prescribing guideline recommendations. Enhanced clinician awareness of factors associated with MEDD has the potential to mitigate LTOT risks and improve overall patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"19 5","pages":"413-422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opioid dose risk, clinician and patient characteristics, and adherence to opioid prescribing recommendations in chronic non-cancer pain.\",\"authors\":\"Christa Coleman, Robert P Lennon, James M Robinson, Wen-Jan Tuan, Nalini Sehgal, Aleksandra E Zgierska\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/jom.0815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess associations between morphine-equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of opioids, clinician and patient characteristics, and prescriber adherence to guidelines for long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) and to elucidate potential relationships associated with increased-risk opioid prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic health system's 33 primary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults (≥18 years old) prescribed LTOT (10 + outpatient prescriptions in the past year) for CNCP.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Electronic health record data on prescribed opioids (for MEDD), clinician/patient characteristics, and adherence rates to LTOT guideline-concordant recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,738 patients were eligible, 61.6 percent Lower, 15.7 percent Moderate, and 22.7 percent Higher Risk MEDD (<50, 50-89, and ≥90 mg/day, respectively). Higher MEDD correlated (p < 0.001) with Medicare insurance, current cigarette smoking, higher pain intensity and interference scores, and the presence of opioid use disorder diagnoses. Male clinicians more frequently prescribed (p < 0.001) and male patients were more likely to be prescribed (p < 0.001) higher MEDD compared to their female counterparts. Higher Risk MEDD was associated with higher coprescribed benzodiazepines (p = 0.015), lower depression screening (p = 0.048), urine drug testing (p = 0.003), comparable active treatment agreement (p = 0.189), opioid misuse risk screening (p = 0.619), and prescription drug monitoring checks (p = 0.203).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study documented that higher MEDD was associated with risks of worse health outcomes without improved adherence to opioid prescribing guideline recommendations. Enhanced clinician awareness of factors associated with MEDD has the potential to mitigate LTOT risks and improve overall patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of opioid management\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"413-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of opioid management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估阿片类药物吗啡当量日剂量(MEDD)、临床医生和患者特征以及处方者对慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)指南的依从性之间的关系,并阐明与阿片类药物处方风险增加相关的潜在关系。设计:回顾性横断面研究。环境:学术卫生系统的33个初级保健诊所。患者:成人(≥18岁)使用LTOT治疗CNCP(过去一年门诊处方10 +)。主要结果测量:处方阿片类药物的电子健康记录数据(用于MEDD),临床医生/患者特征,以及遵守LTOT指南一致建议的比率。结果:共有2738名患者符合条件,其中61.6%为低风险MEDD, 15.7%为中等风险MEDD, 22.7%为高风险MEDD(结论:本研究证明,在没有改善阿片类药物处方指南建议的情况下,较高的MEDD与较差健康结果的风险相关。提高临床医生对MEDD相关因素的认识有可能减轻LTOT风险并改善患者的整体护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Opioid dose risk, clinician and patient characteristics, and adherence to opioid prescribing recommendations in chronic non-cancer pain.

Objective: This study aims to assess associations between morphine-equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of opioids, clinician and patient characteristics, and prescriber adherence to guidelines for long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) and to elucidate potential relationships associated with increased-risk opioid prescribing.

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Setting: Academic health system's 33 primary care clinics.

Patients: Adults (≥18 years old) prescribed LTOT (10 + outpatient prescriptions in the past year) for CNCP.

Main outcome measure(s): Electronic health record data on prescribed opioids (for MEDD), clinician/patient characteristics, and adherence rates to LTOT guideline-concordant recommendations.

Results: A total of 2,738 patients were eligible, 61.6 percent Lower, 15.7 percent Moderate, and 22.7 percent Higher Risk MEDD (<50, 50-89, and ≥90 mg/day, respectively). Higher MEDD correlated (p < 0.001) with Medicare insurance, current cigarette smoking, higher pain intensity and interference scores, and the presence of opioid use disorder diagnoses. Male clinicians more frequently prescribed (p < 0.001) and male patients were more likely to be prescribed (p < 0.001) higher MEDD compared to their female counterparts. Higher Risk MEDD was associated with higher coprescribed benzodiazepines (p = 0.015), lower depression screening (p = 0.048), urine drug testing (p = 0.003), comparable active treatment agreement (p = 0.189), opioid misuse risk screening (p = 0.619), and prescription drug monitoring checks (p = 0.203).

Conclusions: This study documented that higher MEDD was associated with risks of worse health outcomes without improved adherence to opioid prescribing guideline recommendations. Enhanced clinician awareness of factors associated with MEDD has the potential to mitigate LTOT risks and improve overall patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
期刊最新文献
A pilot study to examine the opioid prescribing practices of medical residents. Buprenorphine: An anesthesia-centric review. Initial dose of tapentadol and concomitant use of duloxetine are associated with delirium occurring after initiation of tapentadol therapy in cancer patients. Insurance coverage and consistent pricing is needed for over-the-counter naloxone. Naloxone coprescribing best practice advisory for patients at high risk for opioid-related adverse events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1