[化疗再挑战在转移性结直肠癌患者三线治疗中的疗效:一项真实世界的研究]。

J J Duan, T Ning, M Bai, L Zhang, H L Li, R Liu, S H Ge, X Wang, Y C Yang, Z Ji, F X Wang, Y S Sun, Y Ba, T Deng
{"title":"[化疗再挑战在转移性结直肠癌患者三线治疗中的疗效:一项真实世界的研究]。","authors":"J J Duan, T Ning, M Bai, L Zhang, H L Li, R Liu, S H Ge, X Wang, Y C Yang, Z Ji, F X Wang, Y S Sun, Y Ba, T Deng","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220901-00591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the real world. <b>Methods:</b> The clinicopathological data, treatment information, recent treatment efficacy, adverse events and survival data of mCRC patients who had disease progression after treatment with oxaliplatin-based and/or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and received third-line chemotherapy re-challenge from January 2013 to December 2020 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively collected. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. <b>Results:</b> A total of 95 mCRC patients were included. Among them, 32 patients (33.7%) received chemotherapy alone and 63 patients (66.3%) received chemotherapy combined with targeted drugs. Eighty-three patients were treated with dual-drug chemotherapy (87.4%), including oxaliplatin re-challenge in 35 patients and irinotecan re-challenge in 48 patients. The remaining 12 patients were treated with triplet chemotherapy regimens (12.6%). Among them, as 5 patients had sequential application of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in front-line treatments, their third-line therapy re-challenged both oxaliplatin and irinotecan; 7 patients only had oxaliplatin prescription before, and these patients re-challenged oxaliplatin in the third-line treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 8.6% (8/93) and 61.3% (57/93), respectively. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 months and 13.0 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (34.7%) and neutropenia (34.7%), followed by gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as nausea (32.6%) and vomiting (31.6%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were mostly hematological toxicity. Cox multivariate analysis showed that gender (<i>HR</i>=1.609, 95% <i>CI:</i> 1.016-2.548) and the PFS of front-line treatments (<i>HR</i>=0.598, 95% <i>CI:</i> 0.378-0.947) were independent prognostic factors. <b>Conclusion:</b> The results suggested that it is safe and effective for mCRC patients to choose third-line chemotherapy re-challenge, especially for patients with a PFS of more than one year in front-line treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in third-line setting for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a real-world study].\",\"authors\":\"J J Duan, T Ning, M Bai, L Zhang, H L Li, R Liu, S H Ge, X Wang, Y C Yang, Z Ji, F X Wang, Y S Sun, Y Ba, T Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220901-00591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the real world. <b>Methods:</b> The clinicopathological data, treatment information, recent treatment efficacy, adverse events and survival data of mCRC patients who had disease progression after treatment with oxaliplatin-based and/or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and received third-line chemotherapy re-challenge from January 2013 to December 2020 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively collected. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. <b>Results:</b> A total of 95 mCRC patients were included. Among them, 32 patients (33.7%) received chemotherapy alone and 63 patients (66.3%) received chemotherapy combined with targeted drugs. Eighty-three patients were treated with dual-drug chemotherapy (87.4%), including oxaliplatin re-challenge in 35 patients and irinotecan re-challenge in 48 patients. The remaining 12 patients were treated with triplet chemotherapy regimens (12.6%). Among them, as 5 patients had sequential application of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in front-line treatments, their third-line therapy re-challenged both oxaliplatin and irinotecan; 7 patients only had oxaliplatin prescription before, and these patients re-challenged oxaliplatin in the third-line treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 8.6% (8/93) and 61.3% (57/93), respectively. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 months and 13.0 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (34.7%) and neutropenia (34.7%), followed by gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as nausea (32.6%) and vomiting (31.6%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were mostly hematological toxicity. Cox multivariate analysis showed that gender (<i>HR</i>=1.609, 95% <i>CI:</i> 1.016-2.548) and the PFS of front-line treatments (<i>HR</i>=0.598, 95% <i>CI:</i> 0.378-0.947) were independent prognostic factors. <b>Conclusion:</b> The results suggested that it is safe and effective for mCRC patients to choose third-line chemotherapy re-challenge, especially for patients with a PFS of more than one year in front-line treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华肿瘤杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华肿瘤杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220901-00591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肿瘤杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220901-00591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨在现实世界中,转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者三线化疗再挑战的疗效。方法:回顾性收集2013年1月至2020年12月天津医科大学肿瘤研究所及医院接受奥沙利铂和/或伊立替康为基础的化疗并接受三线化疗再挑战后出现疾病进展的mCRC患者的临床病理资料、治疗信息、近期治疗疗效、不良事件及生存资料。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用Cox比例风险模型分析预后因素。结果:共纳入95例mCRC患者。其中,单独化疗32例(33.7%),联合靶向药物化疗63例(66.3%)。83例患者接受双药化疗(87.4%),其中奥沙利铂再攻35例,伊立替康再攻48例。其余12例患者采用三联化疗方案(12.6%)。其中,由于5例患者在一线治疗中先后应用奥沙利铂和伊立替康,其三线治疗对奥沙利铂和伊立替康再次构成挑战;7例患者之前仅服用奥沙利铂,这些患者在三线治疗中再次挑战奥沙利铂。总有效率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为8.6%(8/93)和61.3%(57/93)。中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和中位总生存期(mOS)分别为4.9个月和13.0个月。最常见的不良反应是白细胞减少(34.7%)和中性粒细胞减少(34.7%),其次是恶心(32.6%)和呕吐(31.6%)等胃肠道不良反应。3-4级不良反应以血液学毒性为主。Cox多因素分析显示,性别(HR=1.609, 95% CI: 1.016 ~ 2.548)和一线治疗PFS (HR=0.598, 95% CI: 0.378 ~ 0.947)为独立预后因素。结论:结果提示mCRC患者选择三线化疗再挑战是安全有效的,特别是对于PFS超过1年的一线治疗患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in third-line setting for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a real-world study].

Objective: To explore the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the real world. Methods: The clinicopathological data, treatment information, recent treatment efficacy, adverse events and survival data of mCRC patients who had disease progression after treatment with oxaliplatin-based and/or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and received third-line chemotherapy re-challenge from January 2013 to December 2020 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively collected. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. Results: A total of 95 mCRC patients were included. Among them, 32 patients (33.7%) received chemotherapy alone and 63 patients (66.3%) received chemotherapy combined with targeted drugs. Eighty-three patients were treated with dual-drug chemotherapy (87.4%), including oxaliplatin re-challenge in 35 patients and irinotecan re-challenge in 48 patients. The remaining 12 patients were treated with triplet chemotherapy regimens (12.6%). Among them, as 5 patients had sequential application of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in front-line treatments, their third-line therapy re-challenged both oxaliplatin and irinotecan; 7 patients only had oxaliplatin prescription before, and these patients re-challenged oxaliplatin in the third-line treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 8.6% (8/93) and 61.3% (57/93), respectively. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 months and 13.0 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (34.7%) and neutropenia (34.7%), followed by gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as nausea (32.6%) and vomiting (31.6%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were mostly hematological toxicity. Cox multivariate analysis showed that gender (HR=1.609, 95% CI: 1.016-2.548) and the PFS of front-line treatments (HR=0.598, 95% CI: 0.378-0.947) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: The results suggested that it is safe and effective for mCRC patients to choose third-line chemotherapy re-challenge, especially for patients with a PFS of more than one year in front-line treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华肿瘤杂志
中华肿瘤杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10433
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[International comparison and assessment of the quality of drug clinical trial implementation in China based on scientific regulatory system]. [A case of primary giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver]. [Chinese multidisciplinary expert consensus on the rational use of surufatinib in clinical practice(2024 edition)]. [Clinical predictive value of PD-1/PD-L1-induced electrocardiogram changes for cardiotoxicity]. [CT measurement of blood perfusion in hepatocellular carcinoma: from basic principle, measurement methods to clinical application].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1