机器学习在老年髋部骨折患者延长住院时间预测中的应用。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS World Journal of Orthopedics Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.5312/wjo.v14.i10.741
Chu-Wei Tian, Xiang-Xu Chen, Liu Shi, Huan-Yi Zhu, Guang-Chun Dai, Hui Chen, Yun-Feng Rui
{"title":"机器学习在老年髋部骨折患者延长住院时间预测中的应用。","authors":"Chu-Wei Tian, Xiang-Xu Chen, Liu Shi, Huan-Yi Zhu, Guang-Chun Dai, Hui Chen, Yun-Feng Rui","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v14.i10.741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric hip fractures are one of the most common fractures in elderly individuals, and prolonged hospital stays increase the risk of death and complications. Machine learning (ML) has become prevalent in clinical data processing and predictive models. This study aims to develop ML models for predicting extended length of stay (eLOS) among geriatric patients with hip fractures and to identify the associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop ML models for predicting the eLOS among geriatric patients with hip fractures, identify associated risk factors, and compare the performance of each model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted at a single orthopaedic trauma centre, enrolling all patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2018 and December 2022. The study collected various patient characteristics, encompassing demographic data, general health status, injury-related data, laboratory examinations, surgery-related data, and length of stay. Features that exhibited significant differences in univariate analysis were integrated into the ML model establishment and subsequently cross-verified. The study compared the performance of the ML models and determined the risk factors for eLOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 763 patients, with 380 experiencing eLOS. Among the models, the decision tree, random forest, and extreme Gradient Boosting models demonstrated the most robust performance. Notably, the artificial neural network model also exhibited impressive results. After cross-validation, the support vector machine and logistic regression models demonstrated superior performance. Predictors for eLOS included delayed surgery, D-dimer level, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification, type of surgery, and sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML proved to be highly accurate in predicting the eLOS for geriatric patients with hip fractures. The identified key risk factors were delayed surgery, D-dimer level, ASA classification, type of surgery, and sex. This valuable information can aid clinicians in allocating resources more efficiently to meet patient demand effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning applications for the prediction of extended length of stay in geriatric hip fracture patients.\",\"authors\":\"Chu-Wei Tian, Xiang-Xu Chen, Liu Shi, Huan-Yi Zhu, Guang-Chun Dai, Hui Chen, Yun-Feng Rui\",\"doi\":\"10.5312/wjo.v14.i10.741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric hip fractures are one of the most common fractures in elderly individuals, and prolonged hospital stays increase the risk of death and complications. Machine learning (ML) has become prevalent in clinical data processing and predictive models. This study aims to develop ML models for predicting extended length of stay (eLOS) among geriatric patients with hip fractures and to identify the associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop ML models for predicting the eLOS among geriatric patients with hip fractures, identify associated risk factors, and compare the performance of each model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted at a single orthopaedic trauma centre, enrolling all patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2018 and December 2022. The study collected various patient characteristics, encompassing demographic data, general health status, injury-related data, laboratory examinations, surgery-related data, and length of stay. Features that exhibited significant differences in univariate analysis were integrated into the ML model establishment and subsequently cross-verified. The study compared the performance of the ML models and determined the risk factors for eLOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 763 patients, with 380 experiencing eLOS. Among the models, the decision tree, random forest, and extreme Gradient Boosting models demonstrated the most robust performance. Notably, the artificial neural network model also exhibited impressive results. After cross-validation, the support vector machine and logistic regression models demonstrated superior performance. Predictors for eLOS included delayed surgery, D-dimer level, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification, type of surgery, and sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML proved to be highly accurate in predicting the eLOS for geriatric patients with hip fractures. The identified key risk factors were delayed surgery, D-dimer level, ASA classification, type of surgery, and sex. This valuable information can aid clinicians in allocating resources more efficiently to meet patient demand effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642403/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i10.741\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i10.741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年髋部骨折是老年人最常见的骨折之一,延长住院时间会增加死亡和并发症的风险。机器学习(ML)已经在临床数据处理和预测模型中变得普遍。本研究旨在建立预测老年髋部骨折患者延长住院时间(eLOS)的ML模型,并确定相关的危险因素。目的:建立预测老年髋部骨折患者eLOS的ML模型,识别相关危险因素,并比较各模型的性能。方法:在单个骨科创伤中心进行回顾性研究,纳入2018年1月至2022年12月期间接受髋部骨折手术的所有患者。该研究收集了各种患者特征,包括人口统计数据、一般健康状况、受伤相关数据、实验室检查、手术相关数据和住院时间。在单变量分析中表现出显著差异的特征被整合到ML模型的建立中,随后进行交叉验证。该研究比较了ML模型的性能,并确定了eLOS的危险因素。结果:共纳入763例患者,其中380例发生eLOS。其中,决策树、随机森林和极端梯度增强模型的鲁棒性最强。值得注意的是,人工神经网络模型也显示出令人印象深刻的结果。经过交叉验证,支持向量机和逻辑回归模型表现出较好的性能。eLOS的预测因素包括延迟手术、d -二聚体水平、美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分类、手术类型和性别。结论:ML在预测老年髋部骨折患者eLOS方面具有较高的准确性。确定的关键危险因素是延迟手术、d -二聚体水平、ASA分类、手术类型和性别。这些有价值的信息可以帮助临床医生更有效地分配资源,以有效地满足患者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning applications for the prediction of extended length of stay in geriatric hip fracture patients.

Background: Geriatric hip fractures are one of the most common fractures in elderly individuals, and prolonged hospital stays increase the risk of death and complications. Machine learning (ML) has become prevalent in clinical data processing and predictive models. This study aims to develop ML models for predicting extended length of stay (eLOS) among geriatric patients with hip fractures and to identify the associated risk factors.

Aim: To develop ML models for predicting the eLOS among geriatric patients with hip fractures, identify associated risk factors, and compare the performance of each model.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a single orthopaedic trauma centre, enrolling all patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2018 and December 2022. The study collected various patient characteristics, encompassing demographic data, general health status, injury-related data, laboratory examinations, surgery-related data, and length of stay. Features that exhibited significant differences in univariate analysis were integrated into the ML model establishment and subsequently cross-verified. The study compared the performance of the ML models and determined the risk factors for eLOS.

Results: The study included 763 patients, with 380 experiencing eLOS. Among the models, the decision tree, random forest, and extreme Gradient Boosting models demonstrated the most robust performance. Notably, the artificial neural network model also exhibited impressive results. After cross-validation, the support vector machine and logistic regression models demonstrated superior performance. Predictors for eLOS included delayed surgery, D-dimer level, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification, type of surgery, and sex.

Conclusion: ML proved to be highly accurate in predicting the eLOS for geriatric patients with hip fractures. The identified key risk factors were delayed surgery, D-dimer level, ASA classification, type of surgery, and sex. This valuable information can aid clinicians in allocating resources more efficiently to meet patient demand effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
期刊最新文献
Application prospects of urine-derived stem cells in neurological and musculoskeletal diseases. Atypical cervical spondylotic radiculopathy resulting in a hypertensive emergency during cervical extension: A case report and review of literature. Clinical implications of reconsideration of enthesitis/enthesopathy/enthesial erosion, as tendon attachment-localized avulsions and stress fracture equivalents. Conversion hip arthroplasty for failed nailing of intertrochanteric fracture: Reflections on some important aspects. Evidence-based orthobiologic practice: Current evidence review and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1