呼出一氧化氮测量和非特异性呼吸道症状的诊断

{"title":"呼出一氧化氮测量和非特异性呼吸道症状的诊断","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To assess whether exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) measurements improve management and clinician confidence in patients presenting with non-specific respiratory symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This observational study was based in a large primary care practice (15,500 patients, 14 GPs). Patients had non-specific respiratory symptoms for at least 6 weeks. FENO and spirometry measurements were performed at initial assessment. An algorithm was employed to assist interpretation of FENO and spirometry results. GPs evaluated the diagnostic contribution of FENO and spirometry at 3-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 48/51 (94%) of cases, FENO was considered significant in formulating a diagnosis. Spirometry was deemed helpful in 27/51 (54%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>FENO measurements improved diagnostic confidence when assessing non-specific respiratory symptoms. This may be because, in contrast to spirometry, both low and high FENO values have clinical significance. Trial registration: Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012605000354684.</p><p>Reproduced with the permission of the General Practice Airways Group (awaiting permission).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101083,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.06.015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exhaled nitric oxide measurements and diagnosis of non-specific respiratory symptoms\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.06.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To assess whether exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) measurements improve management and clinician confidence in patients presenting with non-specific respiratory symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This observational study was based in a large primary care practice (15,500 patients, 14 GPs). Patients had non-specific respiratory symptoms for at least 6 weeks. FENO and spirometry measurements were performed at initial assessment. An algorithm was employed to assist interpretation of FENO and spirometry results. GPs evaluated the diagnostic contribution of FENO and spirometry at 3-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 48/51 (94%) of cases, FENO was considered significant in formulating a diagnosis. Spirometry was deemed helpful in 27/51 (54%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>FENO measurements improved diagnostic confidence when assessing non-specific respiratory symptoms. This may be because, in contrast to spirometry, both low and high FENO values have clinical significance. Trial registration: Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012605000354684.</p><p>Reproduced with the permission of the General Practice Airways Group (awaiting permission).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.06.015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1745045408000476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1745045408000476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估呼出一氧化氮(FENO)测量是否能改善出现非特异性呼吸道症状患者的管理和临床医生的信心。方法本观察性研究基于大型初级保健实践(15500例患者,14名全科医生)。患者出现非特异性呼吸道症状至少6周。在初始评估时进行FENO和肺活量测定。采用一种算法来辅助解释FENO和肺活量测定结果。在3个月的随访中,全科医生评估了FENO和肺活量测定的诊断作用。结果48/51例(94%)的病例中,诊断结果为0。27/51(54%)患者认为肺量测定有帮助。结论feno测量可提高非特异性呼吸道症状的诊断可信度。这可能是因为,与肺活量测定法相比,低和高FENO值都具有临床意义。试验注册:澳大利亚临床试验注册中心ACTRN012605000354684。经全科航空集团许可(等待许可)转载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exhaled nitric oxide measurements and diagnosis of non-specific respiratory symptoms

Aims

To assess whether exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) measurements improve management and clinician confidence in patients presenting with non-specific respiratory symptoms.

Methods

This observational study was based in a large primary care practice (15,500 patients, 14 GPs). Patients had non-specific respiratory symptoms for at least 6 weeks. FENO and spirometry measurements were performed at initial assessment. An algorithm was employed to assist interpretation of FENO and spirometry results. GPs evaluated the diagnostic contribution of FENO and spirometry at 3-month follow-up.

Results

In 48/51 (94%) of cases, FENO was considered significant in formulating a diagnosis. Spirometry was deemed helpful in 27/51 (54%).

Conclusion

FENO measurements improved diagnostic confidence when assessing non-specific respiratory symptoms. This may be because, in contrast to spirometry, both low and high FENO values have clinical significance. Trial registration: Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012605000354684.

Reproduced with the permission of the General Practice Airways Group (awaiting permission).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial ATS 2009 Conference Report Diabetes and metabolic dysfunction in COPD Investigating a potential role for macrolide therapy in COPD Comparison of new prognostic assessments in COPD patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1