{"title":"压力-流量法:一些基本概念。","authors":"C C Yates, B J McWilliams, L D Vallino","doi":"10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0193:tpfmsf>2.3.co;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pressure-flow method introduced by Warren and DuBois is a useful method for estimating velopharyngeal orifice area. However, this investigation shows that unless geometric similarity of subject and model exists, the value of the flow coefficient k used in the equation to estimate velopharyngeal orifice area cannot be established from model tests. Use of k = 0.65 is questioned as that value is typical of thin plate orifices, a geometry that is not a good representation of the velopharyngeal passage. Values of k from the literature and from steady state tests using a model similar to Warren's are presented to show the effect of various inlet shapes. The influence of inlet shape supports the conclusion that k may be significantly higher than 0.65, conceivably approaching values in the range of 0.9 to 0.97, depending on the orifice geometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":76622,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate journal","volume":"27 2","pages":"193-8; discussion 198-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0193:tpfmsf>2.3.co;2","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pressure-flow method: some fundamental concepts.\",\"authors\":\"C C Yates, B J McWilliams, L D Vallino\",\"doi\":\"10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0193:tpfmsf>2.3.co;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The pressure-flow method introduced by Warren and DuBois is a useful method for estimating velopharyngeal orifice area. However, this investigation shows that unless geometric similarity of subject and model exists, the value of the flow coefficient k used in the equation to estimate velopharyngeal orifice area cannot be established from model tests. Use of k = 0.65 is questioned as that value is typical of thin plate orifices, a geometry that is not a good representation of the velopharyngeal passage. Values of k from the literature and from steady state tests using a model similar to Warren's are presented to show the effect of various inlet shapes. The influence of inlet shape supports the conclusion that k may be significantly higher than 0.65, conceivably approaching values in the range of 0.9 to 0.97, depending on the orifice geometry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cleft palate journal\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"193-8; discussion 198-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0193:tpfmsf>2.3.co;2\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cleft palate journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0193:tpfmsf>2.3.co;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0193:tpfmsf>2.3.co;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The pressure-flow method: some fundamental concepts.
The pressure-flow method introduced by Warren and DuBois is a useful method for estimating velopharyngeal orifice area. However, this investigation shows that unless geometric similarity of subject and model exists, the value of the flow coefficient k used in the equation to estimate velopharyngeal orifice area cannot be established from model tests. Use of k = 0.65 is questioned as that value is typical of thin plate orifices, a geometry that is not a good representation of the velopharyngeal passage. Values of k from the literature and from steady state tests using a model similar to Warren's are presented to show the effect of various inlet shapes. The influence of inlet shape supports the conclusion that k may be significantly higher than 0.65, conceivably approaching values in the range of 0.9 to 0.97, depending on the orifice geometry.