位于伊萨卡岛和费契亚岛之间的利科尔岛

Silvia Pierosara
{"title":"位于伊萨卡岛和费契亚岛之间的利科尔岛","authors":"Silvia Pierosara","doi":"10.14195/0872-0851_64_12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this contribution is to critically engage with the ricoeurian reading of the topic of recognition in the Homeric poem Odyssey. The hypothesis presented here is that the ricoeurian reading shows only one side of the coin, since it is almost solely focused on the recognition received by Ulysses when he comes back to Ithaca incognito. Ricoeur stresses the unilaterality of recognition, which is only directed to re‑establish Ulysses’ power as king. Being recognized as the king of Ithaca does not imply, so Ricoeur’s argument goes, to recognize those who are subjected to him, and is a mere way of exhibiting power. But there is another possible reading of the scenes of recognition in the Odyssey, even if Ricoeur does not take them into account. Indeed, another moment of the recognition story can be found in the Isle of the Phaeacians, and it cannot be traced back to the “will to power”, but, rather, to Ulysses’s fragility. When Demodocus, the poet at the court of the king Alcinoos, starts singing the story of the famous hero Ulysses, who is there incognito, Ulysses cannot hold back his tears, and in the end he discloses his own identity. Here, Ulysses does not look for recognition, instead recognition is granted to him in an unexpected way. This act of recognition reveals all the fragility of the hero, who discovers himself in the words of others, and understands that he depends upon them to be, to exist, and, in the end, to come back home. This sort of “recognition by fragility” is possible due to a narrative dimension where Ulysses is hosted, and whose configurative and refigurative power makes the hero able to name his feeling as a feeling of “nostalgia”.","PeriodicalId":52758,"journal":{"name":"Revista Filosofica de Coimbra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ricoeur between Ithaca and the isle of the Phaecians\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Pierosara\",\"doi\":\"10.14195/0872-0851_64_12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this contribution is to critically engage with the ricoeurian reading of the topic of recognition in the Homeric poem Odyssey. The hypothesis presented here is that the ricoeurian reading shows only one side of the coin, since it is almost solely focused on the recognition received by Ulysses when he comes back to Ithaca incognito. Ricoeur stresses the unilaterality of recognition, which is only directed to re‑establish Ulysses’ power as king. Being recognized as the king of Ithaca does not imply, so Ricoeur’s argument goes, to recognize those who are subjected to him, and is a mere way of exhibiting power. But there is another possible reading of the scenes of recognition in the Odyssey, even if Ricoeur does not take them into account. Indeed, another moment of the recognition story can be found in the Isle of the Phaeacians, and it cannot be traced back to the “will to power”, but, rather, to Ulysses’s fragility. When Demodocus, the poet at the court of the king Alcinoos, starts singing the story of the famous hero Ulysses, who is there incognito, Ulysses cannot hold back his tears, and in the end he discloses his own identity. Here, Ulysses does not look for recognition, instead recognition is granted to him in an unexpected way. This act of recognition reveals all the fragility of the hero, who discovers himself in the words of others, and understands that he depends upon them to be, to exist, and, in the end, to come back home. This sort of “recognition by fragility” is possible due to a narrative dimension where Ulysses is hosted, and whose configurative and refigurative power makes the hero able to name his feeling as a feeling of “nostalgia”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Filosofica de Coimbra\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Filosofica de Coimbra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14195/0872-0851_64_12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Filosofica de Coimbra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/0872-0851_64_12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一贡献的目的是批判性地参与在荷马诗歌《奥德赛》中认识的主题的里柯式阅读。这里提出的假设是,利科里解读只显示了硬币的一面,因为它几乎完全集中在尤利西斯隐姓埋名回到伊萨卡时得到的认可上。利科强调承认的单一性,这只是为了重新确立尤利西斯作为国王的权力。被承认为伊萨卡的国王并不意味着,利科的论点是,承认那些臣服于他的人,而仅仅是展示权力的一种方式。但是,对《奥德赛》中认出来的场景还有另一种可能的解读,即使利科尔没有把它们考虑在内。事实上,在费阿契斯岛上可以找到另一个承认故事的时刻,它不能追溯到“权力意志”,而是追溯到尤利西斯的脆弱。当国王阿尔奇诺斯的宫廷里的诗人狄莫多科斯开始唱出隐姓埋名的著名英雄尤利西斯的故事时,尤利西斯忍不住流下了眼泪,最后他透露了自己的身份。在这里,尤利西斯并没有寻求认可,相反,认可以一种意想不到的方式给予了他。这种承认的行为揭示了英雄的所有脆弱性,他在别人的话语中发现自己,并明白他依赖于他们的存在,存在,并最终回家。这种“脆弱的承认”是可能的,因为尤利西斯是由一个叙事维度承载的,其配置和修饰的力量使英雄能够将他的感觉命名为一种“怀旧”的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ricoeur between Ithaca and the isle of the Phaecians
The aim of this contribution is to critically engage with the ricoeurian reading of the topic of recognition in the Homeric poem Odyssey. The hypothesis presented here is that the ricoeurian reading shows only one side of the coin, since it is almost solely focused on the recognition received by Ulysses when he comes back to Ithaca incognito. Ricoeur stresses the unilaterality of recognition, which is only directed to re‑establish Ulysses’ power as king. Being recognized as the king of Ithaca does not imply, so Ricoeur’s argument goes, to recognize those who are subjected to him, and is a mere way of exhibiting power. But there is another possible reading of the scenes of recognition in the Odyssey, even if Ricoeur does not take them into account. Indeed, another moment of the recognition story can be found in the Isle of the Phaeacians, and it cannot be traced back to the “will to power”, but, rather, to Ulysses’s fragility. When Demodocus, the poet at the court of the king Alcinoos, starts singing the story of the famous hero Ulysses, who is there incognito, Ulysses cannot hold back his tears, and in the end he discloses his own identity. Here, Ulysses does not look for recognition, instead recognition is granted to him in an unexpected way. This act of recognition reveals all the fragility of the hero, who discovers himself in the words of others, and understands that he depends upon them to be, to exist, and, in the end, to come back home. This sort of “recognition by fragility” is possible due to a narrative dimension where Ulysses is hosted, and whose configurative and refigurative power makes the hero able to name his feeling as a feeling of “nostalgia”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
O real — no conhecimento A excepção Derrida – O “eleito secreto” dos animais A veia onto-antropo-teo-lógica em questão Ricoeur between Ithaca and the isle of the Phaecians Petrus de Alvernia, Quaestiones Super I‑VIII Libros Politicorum. A Critical Edition and Study by Marco Toste, (Leuven/Louvain: Leuven University Press, Ancient and Medieval Philosophy Series 1: LXI, 2022). ISBN: 978-94-6270-318-6. 902 pp. Jean-Paul Coujou, Suárez dans l’Histoire de la Métaphysique. Volume 1: L’Héritage et le débat contemporain, (Collection Carte Blanche), (Toulouse: Entremises Éditions, 2022). ISBN: 978-2-38255-037-3. 237 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1