Siobhán Murphy, Dermot O'Reilly, Emma Ross, Aideen Maguire, Denise O'Hagan
{"title":"在急诊室自残后的自杀风险因医院而异","authors":"Siobhán Murphy, Dermot O'Reilly, Emma Ross, Aideen Maguire, Denise O'Hagan","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesA large proportion of those who die by suicide present to an Emergency Department (ED) with self-harm (SH) in the year before death. This study examines ‘does risk of death following ED presentation with SH vary according to hospital attended?’
 MethodsThe Northern Ireland Self-Harm Registry provided data on SH presentations to 12 ED departments in NI between 2012-2019. Linkage to health and mortality records provided follow up to December 2019. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to assess mortality risk following presentation with SH among 12 ED departments in NI.
 ResultsAnalysis of the 64,350 ED presentations for self-harm by 30,011 individuals confirmed a marked variation across EDs in proportion of patients receiving mental health assessment and likelihood of admission to general and psychiatric wards. There was a significant variation in suicide risk according to ED attended with the three-fold range between the lowest (HRadj 0.32 95%CIs 0.16, 0.67) and highest. These differences persisted even after adjustment for patient characteristics, variation in types of self-harm, and care management at the ED.
 ConclusionManagement of SH cases in the ED is important, however, it is the availability, access and level of engagement with, care in the community rather than the immediate care at EDs that is most critical for patients presenting to ED with self-harm.","PeriodicalId":132937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Population Data Science","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicide risk following Emergency Department presentation with self-harm varies by hospital\",\"authors\":\"Siobhán Murphy, Dermot O'Reilly, Emma Ross, Aideen Maguire, Denise O'Hagan\",\"doi\":\"10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesA large proportion of those who die by suicide present to an Emergency Department (ED) with self-harm (SH) in the year before death. This study examines ‘does risk of death following ED presentation with SH vary according to hospital attended?’
 MethodsThe Northern Ireland Self-Harm Registry provided data on SH presentations to 12 ED departments in NI between 2012-2019. Linkage to health and mortality records provided follow up to December 2019. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to assess mortality risk following presentation with SH among 12 ED departments in NI.
 ResultsAnalysis of the 64,350 ED presentations for self-harm by 30,011 individuals confirmed a marked variation across EDs in proportion of patients receiving mental health assessment and likelihood of admission to general and psychiatric wards. There was a significant variation in suicide risk according to ED attended with the three-fold range between the lowest (HRadj 0.32 95%CIs 0.16, 0.67) and highest. These differences persisted even after adjustment for patient characteristics, variation in types of self-harm, and care management at the ED.
 ConclusionManagement of SH cases in the ED is important, however, it is the availability, access and level of engagement with, care in the community rather than the immediate care at EDs that is most critical for patients presenting to ED with self-harm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Population Data Science\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Population Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在自杀死亡的患者中,有很大一部分人在死前一年曾有过自残(SH)。本研究探讨了“ED合并SH后的死亡风险是否因医院而异?”
方法:北爱尔兰自残登记处提供了2012-2019年北爱尔兰12个ED部门的自残报告数据。提供截至2019年12月的健康和死亡率记录的联系。采用Cox比例风险回归模型评估NI 12个急诊科的SH患者的死亡风险。
结果:对来自30,011个人的64,350份ED自残报告的分析证实,在接受心理健康评估的患者比例以及进入普通病房和精神病房的可能性方面,ED之间存在显著差异。参加ED的患者的自杀风险有显著差异,最低(HRadj = 0.32, 95% ci = 0.16, 0.67)和最高(HRadj = 0.32, 95% ci = 0.16, 0.67)之间有3倍的差异。即使在调整了患者特征、自我伤害类型的变化和急诊科的护理管理之后,这些差异仍然存在。
结论:急诊科对自残患者的管理很重要,然而,对急诊科自残患者来说,最关键的是社区护理的可得性、可及性和参与程度,而不是急诊科的即时护理。
Suicide risk following Emergency Department presentation with self-harm varies by hospital
ObjectivesA large proportion of those who die by suicide present to an Emergency Department (ED) with self-harm (SH) in the year before death. This study examines ‘does risk of death following ED presentation with SH vary according to hospital attended?’
MethodsThe Northern Ireland Self-Harm Registry provided data on SH presentations to 12 ED departments in NI between 2012-2019. Linkage to health and mortality records provided follow up to December 2019. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to assess mortality risk following presentation with SH among 12 ED departments in NI.
ResultsAnalysis of the 64,350 ED presentations for self-harm by 30,011 individuals confirmed a marked variation across EDs in proportion of patients receiving mental health assessment and likelihood of admission to general and psychiatric wards. There was a significant variation in suicide risk according to ED attended with the three-fold range between the lowest (HRadj 0.32 95%CIs 0.16, 0.67) and highest. These differences persisted even after adjustment for patient characteristics, variation in types of self-harm, and care management at the ED.
ConclusionManagement of SH cases in the ED is important, however, it is the availability, access and level of engagement with, care in the community rather than the immediate care at EDs that is most critical for patients presenting to ED with self-harm.