外固定架与锁定加压钢板在“皮上”模式下治疗胫骨远端开放性骨折:经济、愈合、功能结局和并发症的比较

Rubinder Kaur, Abhishek Sharma, Sanjay Kumar Thakur, Manik Sehgal
{"title":"外固定架与锁定加压钢板在“皮上”模式下治疗胫骨远端开放性骨折:经济、愈合、功能结局和并发症的比较","authors":"Rubinder Kaur, Abhishek Sharma, Sanjay Kumar Thakur, Manik Sehgal","doi":"10.25259/ijrsms-2022-2-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Historically, in the pre-antiseptic era, there was a great fear of open tibial factors because of high incidence of infection eventually leading to amputation and in many cases septicemia and death. Despite improvements in surgical techniques in the last century, the optimum treatment for open type IIIa and Type II tibial farcture remains controversial. Literature available on use of Ex-fix as a definitive and permanent modality is very sparse and is not encouraging. In order to maintain biology of the fracture and to expedite the healing process many institutions and surgeons are using Locking compression plate as an external fixator which is fondly called as supracutaneous plating (SCP). Material and Methods The patients who had Gustilo and Anderson type II and IIIa # of distal Tibia were enrolled in this study. They were randomized into 2 groups. In one group (Ex-Fix) external fixator was applied in and in another group SCP was done. Four general indicators, including direct cost of hospitalization, first surgery time, time to full weight bearing, and time to complete union were compared between the groups. The functional outcome of the ankle was assessed. Presence of infection, Time to union was noted in both cases. Results Mean time to fracture union was statistically less in SCP group 5.84 months as compared to 7.21 months in Ex–fix group. Also, 12 patients in Ex-fix group had to undergo a reoperation as compare to only 1 in SCP group. This led to higher cost of expenditure and higher duration of stay in Ex-fix group. AOFAS Score, Teeny and Wiss were better in SCP group as compared to Ex-fix group. Conclusion Highlighting the role Of LCP in Supracutaneous mode as a definitive and final surgery , thus reducing the financial and psychological implication of reoperations in open grade and tibial fractures which are seen in patients managed with Ex-fix in definitive mode or as an interval for secondary nailing, we recommend the use of routine use of SCP in such tibial fractures after thorough debridement and diligent handling of soft tissue.","PeriodicalId":499227,"journal":{"name":"International journal of recent surgical and medical science","volume":"358 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Fixator vs. Locking Compression Plate in “Supracutaneous” Mode for Open Distal Tibial Fractures: A Comparison on Economics, Union, Functional Outcome and Complications\",\"authors\":\"Rubinder Kaur, Abhishek Sharma, Sanjay Kumar Thakur, Manik Sehgal\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijrsms-2022-2-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives Historically, in the pre-antiseptic era, there was a great fear of open tibial factors because of high incidence of infection eventually leading to amputation and in many cases septicemia and death. Despite improvements in surgical techniques in the last century, the optimum treatment for open type IIIa and Type II tibial farcture remains controversial. Literature available on use of Ex-fix as a definitive and permanent modality is very sparse and is not encouraging. In order to maintain biology of the fracture and to expedite the healing process many institutions and surgeons are using Locking compression plate as an external fixator which is fondly called as supracutaneous plating (SCP). Material and Methods The patients who had Gustilo and Anderson type II and IIIa # of distal Tibia were enrolled in this study. They were randomized into 2 groups. In one group (Ex-Fix) external fixator was applied in and in another group SCP was done. Four general indicators, including direct cost of hospitalization, first surgery time, time to full weight bearing, and time to complete union were compared between the groups. The functional outcome of the ankle was assessed. Presence of infection, Time to union was noted in both cases. Results Mean time to fracture union was statistically less in SCP group 5.84 months as compared to 7.21 months in Ex–fix group. Also, 12 patients in Ex-fix group had to undergo a reoperation as compare to only 1 in SCP group. This led to higher cost of expenditure and higher duration of stay in Ex-fix group. AOFAS Score, Teeny and Wiss were better in SCP group as compared to Ex-fix group. Conclusion Highlighting the role Of LCP in Supracutaneous mode as a definitive and final surgery , thus reducing the financial and psychological implication of reoperations in open grade and tibial fractures which are seen in patients managed with Ex-fix in definitive mode or as an interval for secondary nailing, we recommend the use of routine use of SCP in such tibial fractures after thorough debridement and diligent handling of soft tissue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of recent surgical and medical science\",\"volume\":\"358 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of recent surgical and medical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijrsms-2022-2-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of recent surgical and medical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijrsms-2022-2-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在历史上,在未使用防腐剂的时代,由于感染的高发生率最终导致截肢,在许多情况下败血症和死亡,人们对胫骨开放性因素非常恐惧。尽管手术技术在上个世纪有所进步,但开放性IIIa型和II型胫骨骨折的最佳治疗方法仍然存在争议。关于将Ex-fix用作确定的和永久的情态的文献非常少,而且不令人鼓舞。为了保持骨折的生物学特性和加速愈合过程,许多机构和外科医生都使用Locking加压钢板作为外固定架,这种钢板被人们称为皮上钢板(SCP)。材料与方法选择胫骨远端Gustilo和Anderson II型和IIIa #型患者为研究对象。随机分为两组。一组采用Ex-Fix外固定架,另一组采用SCP。比较两组间直接住院费用、首次手术时间、完全负重时间、完全愈合时间等4项一般指标。评估踝关节的功能结局。感染的存在,两例患者的愈合时间均有记录。结果SCP组平均骨折愈合时间比Ex-fix组短,前者为5.84个月,后者为7.21个月。此外,Ex-fix组有12例患者需要再次手术,而SCP组只有1例。这导致了更高的支出成本和在Ex-fix组的停留时间更长。SCP组的AOFAS评分、Teeny和Wiss均优于Ex-fix组。结论强调皮上LCP作为最终和最终手术的作用,从而减少开放性骨折和胫骨骨折再次手术的经济和心理影响,这些患者在最终模式下使用Ex-fix或作为二次钉入的间隔,我们建议在彻底清创和认真处理软组织后常规使用SCP治疗此类胫骨骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
External Fixator vs. Locking Compression Plate in “Supracutaneous” Mode for Open Distal Tibial Fractures: A Comparison on Economics, Union, Functional Outcome and Complications
Objectives Historically, in the pre-antiseptic era, there was a great fear of open tibial factors because of high incidence of infection eventually leading to amputation and in many cases septicemia and death. Despite improvements in surgical techniques in the last century, the optimum treatment for open type IIIa and Type II tibial farcture remains controversial. Literature available on use of Ex-fix as a definitive and permanent modality is very sparse and is not encouraging. In order to maintain biology of the fracture and to expedite the healing process many institutions and surgeons are using Locking compression plate as an external fixator which is fondly called as supracutaneous plating (SCP). Material and Methods The patients who had Gustilo and Anderson type II and IIIa # of distal Tibia were enrolled in this study. They were randomized into 2 groups. In one group (Ex-Fix) external fixator was applied in and in another group SCP was done. Four general indicators, including direct cost of hospitalization, first surgery time, time to full weight bearing, and time to complete union were compared between the groups. The functional outcome of the ankle was assessed. Presence of infection, Time to union was noted in both cases. Results Mean time to fracture union was statistically less in SCP group 5.84 months as compared to 7.21 months in Ex–fix group. Also, 12 patients in Ex-fix group had to undergo a reoperation as compare to only 1 in SCP group. This led to higher cost of expenditure and higher duration of stay in Ex-fix group. AOFAS Score, Teeny and Wiss were better in SCP group as compared to Ex-fix group. Conclusion Highlighting the role Of LCP in Supracutaneous mode as a definitive and final surgery , thus reducing the financial and psychological implication of reoperations in open grade and tibial fractures which are seen in patients managed with Ex-fix in definitive mode or as an interval for secondary nailing, we recommend the use of routine use of SCP in such tibial fractures after thorough debridement and diligent handling of soft tissue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Results of the Pediatric Shaft Femur Fracture Treated with Closed Rigid Lateral Trochanteric Entry Intramedullary Nail in North Indian Population Is Alprazolam A Potential Drug of Abuse In India’s Near Future? Cast Index as a Tool for Predicting Re-displacement after Closed Reduction and Cast Immobilisation in Forearm Fractures in the Pediatric Age Group Comparative Study of Combination of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetate with 5-Fluorouracil Versus Triamcinolone Alone in Treatment of Keloid Post-Operative Analgesia and Enhanced Recovery after Pecs 1 and Pecs 2 Blocks in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy/Breast-Conserving Surgery with Axillary Lymph Nodal Clearance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1