当日家庭康复:机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜裂孔疝修补短期疗效的多中心回顾性分析

Jessica Lee, Sharon Shiraga, Theresa Jackson, Vincent Cheng, Swee Teh
{"title":"当日家庭康复:机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜裂孔疝修补短期疗效的多中心回顾性分析","authors":"Jessica Lee, Sharon Shiraga, Theresa Jackson, Vincent Cheng, Swee Teh","doi":"10.1177/26345161231196023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The minimally invasive approach to hiatal hernia repair has become standard of care and is increasingly performed as a same-day discharge surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery also has many advantages and has gained popularity over the years. This study aims to identify the trends for same-day home recovery between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs in recent years and compare short-term clinical outcomes. A retrospective analysis of elective, non-revisional robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs was performed between January 2020 and December 2022 within a large, multicenter healthcare sys-tem. Combined procedures were excluded. Demographic and intraoperative variables were compared between the cohorts, as well as short-term clinical outcomes to evaluate the safety of same-day home recovery. Analysis included 633 patients (76 robotic-assisted, 557 conventional laparoscopic). Year to year, there was an increasing rate of same-day discharges for both the robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic repairs. Robotic-assisted operative time was longer (median: 143 minutes vs 105 minutes; mean: 155 minutes vs 122 minutes, P < .001). There was no difference in 30-day outcomes, including 7-or 30-day return to emergency department, readmission to hospital, or mortality. Overall, there was a trend toward higher rates of same-day discharge in the robotic-assisted cohort, although this was not statistically significant (75% vs 67%). With similar short-term outcomes, both the robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair and conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair allow for safe same-day home recovery.","PeriodicalId":73049,"journal":{"name":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topic: Esophagus Benign-GERD, Achalasia, MotilityAbstract ID: 98Same-Day Home Recovery: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of the Short-Term Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Lee, Sharon Shiraga, Theresa Jackson, Vincent Cheng, Swee Teh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26345161231196023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The minimally invasive approach to hiatal hernia repair has become standard of care and is increasingly performed as a same-day discharge surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery also has many advantages and has gained popularity over the years. This study aims to identify the trends for same-day home recovery between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs in recent years and compare short-term clinical outcomes. A retrospective analysis of elective, non-revisional robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs was performed between January 2020 and December 2022 within a large, multicenter healthcare sys-tem. Combined procedures were excluded. Demographic and intraoperative variables were compared between the cohorts, as well as short-term clinical outcomes to evaluate the safety of same-day home recovery. Analysis included 633 patients (76 robotic-assisted, 557 conventional laparoscopic). Year to year, there was an increasing rate of same-day discharges for both the robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic repairs. Robotic-assisted operative time was longer (median: 143 minutes vs 105 minutes; mean: 155 minutes vs 122 minutes, P < .001). There was no difference in 30-day outcomes, including 7-or 30-day return to emergency department, readmission to hospital, or mortality. Overall, there was a trend toward higher rates of same-day discharge in the robotic-assisted cohort, although this was not statistically significant (75% vs 67%). With similar short-term outcomes, both the robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair and conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair allow for safe same-day home recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231196023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231196023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Topic: Esophagus Benign-GERD, Achalasia, MotilityAbstract ID: 98Same-Day Home Recovery: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of the Short-Term Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair
The minimally invasive approach to hiatal hernia repair has become standard of care and is increasingly performed as a same-day discharge surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery also has many advantages and has gained popularity over the years. This study aims to identify the trends for same-day home recovery between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs in recent years and compare short-term clinical outcomes. A retrospective analysis of elective, non-revisional robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs was performed between January 2020 and December 2022 within a large, multicenter healthcare sys-tem. Combined procedures were excluded. Demographic and intraoperative variables were compared between the cohorts, as well as short-term clinical outcomes to evaluate the safety of same-day home recovery. Analysis included 633 patients (76 robotic-assisted, 557 conventional laparoscopic). Year to year, there was an increasing rate of same-day discharges for both the robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic repairs. Robotic-assisted operative time was longer (median: 143 minutes vs 105 minutes; mean: 155 minutes vs 122 minutes, P < .001). There was no difference in 30-day outcomes, including 7-or 30-day return to emergency department, readmission to hospital, or mortality. Overall, there was a trend toward higher rates of same-day discharge in the robotic-assisted cohort, although this was not statistically significant (75% vs 67%). With similar short-term outcomes, both the robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair and conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair allow for safe same-day home recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Image Enhanced Endoscopy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Empiric Esophageal Dilation for the Treatment of Non-Obstructive Dysphagia Presidential Address 2023: “Just by Showing Up” Invited Commentary: Reflux Disease Questionnaire Scoring and Utilization: A Scoping Review Gastric Electrical Stimulation is an Effective Treatment Modality for Symptoms of GERD in Patients With Gastroparesis and VACTERL Association
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1