支付灵活性和企业创新

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.33423/jaf.v23i3.6352
Sharier Azim Khan
{"title":"支付灵活性和企业创新","authors":"Sharier Azim Khan","doi":"10.33423/jaf.v23i3.6352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates how flexibility in payout decisions affects firm innovation. Firms that make payout mainly in the form of share repurchase have greater flexibility in making payouts compared to firms that make payout mainly in the form of dividends. Using a sample of 45,644 firm-year observations of 7,888 U.S. firms for the period 1987-2010, I show that firms with greater payout flexibility have higher levels of innovation and have better quality innovations. Using a Granger Causality framework, I show that firm innovation has no significant effect on payout flexibility while payout flexibility results in firm innovation. Results show that firms that make payout in the form of repurchase only, on an average, have 4.4% more patents granted compared to firms that make payout in the form of dividend only. The results are robust to whether I use the entire sample or a sub-sample of observations of firms with at least one patent granted during the sample period.","PeriodicalId":36300,"journal":{"name":"Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Payout Flexibility and Firm Innovation\",\"authors\":\"Sharier Azim Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.33423/jaf.v23i3.6352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates how flexibility in payout decisions affects firm innovation. Firms that make payout mainly in the form of share repurchase have greater flexibility in making payouts compared to firms that make payout mainly in the form of dividends. Using a sample of 45,644 firm-year observations of 7,888 U.S. firms for the period 1987-2010, I show that firms with greater payout flexibility have higher levels of innovation and have better quality innovations. Using a Granger Causality framework, I show that firm innovation has no significant effect on payout flexibility while payout flexibility results in firm innovation. Results show that firms that make payout in the form of repurchase only, on an average, have 4.4% more patents granted compared to firms that make payout in the form of dividend only. The results are robust to whether I use the entire sample or a sub-sample of observations of firms with at least one patent granted during the sample period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v23i3.6352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v23i3.6352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了支付决策的灵活性对企业创新的影响。与主要以股息形式支付股息的公司相比,以股票回购形式支付股息的公司在支付股息方面具有更大的灵活性。通过对7888家美国公司1987-2010年期间的45644个公司年度观察样本的分析,我发现具有更大支付灵活性的公司具有更高的创新水平和更好的创新质量。运用格兰杰因果关系框架,证明企业创新对股利弹性没有显著影响,而股利弹性对企业创新有显著影响。结果显示,仅以回购形式支付的公司比仅以股息形式支付的公司平均多授予4.4%的专利。无论我是使用整个样本还是在样本期间至少获得一项专利的公司观察的子样本,结果都是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Payout Flexibility and Firm Innovation
This paper investigates how flexibility in payout decisions affects firm innovation. Firms that make payout mainly in the form of share repurchase have greater flexibility in making payouts compared to firms that make payout mainly in the form of dividends. Using a sample of 45,644 firm-year observations of 7,888 U.S. firms for the period 1987-2010, I show that firms with greater payout flexibility have higher levels of innovation and have better quality innovations. Using a Granger Causality framework, I show that firm innovation has no significant effect on payout flexibility while payout flexibility results in firm innovation. Results show that firms that make payout in the form of repurchase only, on an average, have 4.4% more patents granted compared to firms that make payout in the form of dividend only. The results are robust to whether I use the entire sample or a sub-sample of observations of firms with at least one patent granted during the sample period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance
Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
The Growth and Profitability of Life Insurance Industry in India – A Comparative Analysis between Public and Private Sector Companies Exploring the Influence of State Support Programs on Patriotism and Future Taxpayer Intentions: Insights from a Developing Economy Regulatory Constraints on Financial Performance of Insurance Firms in Egypt: Structural Equation Model Regulatory Constraints on Financial Performance of Insurance Firms in Egypt: Structural Equation Model Assessing the Forecasting Performance of GARCH Models in the Presence of Instabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1