估算北美土壤地球化学景观数据集中二氧化硅含量和着火损失:递归反演方法

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1144/geochem2023-039
Patrice de Caritat, Eric C. Grunsky, David B. Smith
{"title":"估算北美土壤地球化学景观数据集中二氧化硅含量和着火损失:递归反演方法","authors":"Patrice de Caritat, Eric C. Grunsky, David B. Smith","doi":"10.1144/geochem2023-039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A novel method of estimating the silica (SiO 2 ) and loss-on-ignition (LOI) concentrations for the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes (NASGL) project datasets is proposed. Combining the precision of the geochemical determinations with the completeness of the mineralogical NASGL data, we suggest a ‘reverse normative’ or inversion approach to first calculate the minimum SiO 2 , water (H 2 O) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations in weight percent (wt%) in these samples. These can be used in a first step to compute minimum and maximum estimates for SiO 2 . In a recursive step, a ‘consensus’ SiO 2 is then established as the average between the two aforementioned SiO 2 estimates, trimmed as necessary to yield a total composition (major oxides converted from reported Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S and Ti elemental concentrations + ‘consensus’ SiO 2 + reported trace element concentrations converted to wt% + ‘normative’ H 2 O + ‘normative’ CO 2 ) of no more than 100 wt%. Any remaining compositional gap between 100 wt% and this sum is considered ‘other’ LOI and likely includes H 2 O and CO 2 from the reported ‘amorphous’ phase (of unknown geochemical or mineralogical composition) as well as other volatile components present in soil. We validate the technique against a separate dataset from Australia where geochemical (including all major oxides) and mineralogical data exist on the same samples. The correlation between predicted and observed SiO 2 is linear, strong ( R 2 = 0.91) and homoscedastic. We also compare the estimated NASGL SiO 2 concentrations with a sparser, publicly available continental-scale survey over the conterminous USA, the ‘Shacklette and Boerngen’ dataset. This comparison shows the new data to be a reasonable representation of SiO 2 values measured on the ground over the conterminous USA. We recommend the approach of combining geochemical and mineralogical information to estimate missing SiO 2 and LOI by the recursive inversion approach in datasets elsewhere, with the caveat to always validate results.","PeriodicalId":55114,"journal":{"name":"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the silica content and loss-on-ignition in the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes datasets: a recursive inversion approach\",\"authors\":\"Patrice de Caritat, Eric C. Grunsky, David B. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/geochem2023-039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A novel method of estimating the silica (SiO 2 ) and loss-on-ignition (LOI) concentrations for the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes (NASGL) project datasets is proposed. Combining the precision of the geochemical determinations with the completeness of the mineralogical NASGL data, we suggest a ‘reverse normative’ or inversion approach to first calculate the minimum SiO 2 , water (H 2 O) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations in weight percent (wt%) in these samples. These can be used in a first step to compute minimum and maximum estimates for SiO 2 . In a recursive step, a ‘consensus’ SiO 2 is then established as the average between the two aforementioned SiO 2 estimates, trimmed as necessary to yield a total composition (major oxides converted from reported Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S and Ti elemental concentrations + ‘consensus’ SiO 2 + reported trace element concentrations converted to wt% + ‘normative’ H 2 O + ‘normative’ CO 2 ) of no more than 100 wt%. Any remaining compositional gap between 100 wt% and this sum is considered ‘other’ LOI and likely includes H 2 O and CO 2 from the reported ‘amorphous’ phase (of unknown geochemical or mineralogical composition) as well as other volatile components present in soil. We validate the technique against a separate dataset from Australia where geochemical (including all major oxides) and mineralogical data exist on the same samples. The correlation between predicted and observed SiO 2 is linear, strong ( R 2 = 0.91) and homoscedastic. We also compare the estimated NASGL SiO 2 concentrations with a sparser, publicly available continental-scale survey over the conterminous USA, the ‘Shacklette and Boerngen’ dataset. This comparison shows the new data to be a reasonable representation of SiO 2 values measured on the ground over the conterminous USA. We recommend the approach of combining geochemical and mineralogical information to estimate missing SiO 2 and LOI by the recursive inversion approach in datasets elsewhere, with the caveat to always validate results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2023-039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2023-039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一种估算北美土壤地球化学景观(NASGL)项目数据集二氧化硅(sio2)和燃失量(LOI)浓度的新方法。结合地球化学测定的精度和矿物学NASGL数据的完整性,我们建议采用“反向规范”或反演方法,首先计算这些样品中以重量百分比(wt%)计算的最小sio2、水(h2o)和二氧化碳(co2)浓度。这些可以在第一步中用于计算sio2的最小和最大估计值。在递归步骤中,将“共识”sio2建立为上述两个sio2估计之间的平均值,并根据需要进行调整,以产生总组成(由报告的Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S和Ti元素浓度转换而成的主要氧化物+“共识”sio2 +报告的微量元素浓度转换为wt% +“标准”h2o +“标准”co2)不超过100 wt%。任何在100wt %与此总和之间的剩余成分差距都被认为是“其他”LOI,可能包括来自报告的“无定形”相(未知的地球化学或矿物学成分)的h2o和co2,以及土壤中存在的其他挥发性成分。我们对来自澳大利亚的一个单独的数据集验证了该技术,其中地球化学(包括所有主要氧化物)和矿物学数据存在于相同的样品上。预测值与观测值之间的相关性为强线性(r2 = 0.91)和均方差。我们还将估计的NASGL二氧化硅浓度与一个更稀疏的、公开的、覆盖美国的大陆尺度调查数据集“Shacklette和Boerngen”进行了比较。这一比较表明,新数据是在美国相邻地区地面上测量到的二氧化硅值的合理代表。我们建议将地球化学和矿物学信息相结合的方法,通过递归反演方法在其他数据集中估计缺失的sio2和LOI,并注意始终验证结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating the silica content and loss-on-ignition in the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes datasets: a recursive inversion approach
A novel method of estimating the silica (SiO 2 ) and loss-on-ignition (LOI) concentrations for the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes (NASGL) project datasets is proposed. Combining the precision of the geochemical determinations with the completeness of the mineralogical NASGL data, we suggest a ‘reverse normative’ or inversion approach to first calculate the minimum SiO 2 , water (H 2 O) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations in weight percent (wt%) in these samples. These can be used in a first step to compute minimum and maximum estimates for SiO 2 . In a recursive step, a ‘consensus’ SiO 2 is then established as the average between the two aforementioned SiO 2 estimates, trimmed as necessary to yield a total composition (major oxides converted from reported Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S and Ti elemental concentrations + ‘consensus’ SiO 2 + reported trace element concentrations converted to wt% + ‘normative’ H 2 O + ‘normative’ CO 2 ) of no more than 100 wt%. Any remaining compositional gap between 100 wt% and this sum is considered ‘other’ LOI and likely includes H 2 O and CO 2 from the reported ‘amorphous’ phase (of unknown geochemical or mineralogical composition) as well as other volatile components present in soil. We validate the technique against a separate dataset from Australia where geochemical (including all major oxides) and mineralogical data exist on the same samples. The correlation between predicted and observed SiO 2 is linear, strong ( R 2 = 0.91) and homoscedastic. We also compare the estimated NASGL SiO 2 concentrations with a sparser, publicly available continental-scale survey over the conterminous USA, the ‘Shacklette and Boerngen’ dataset. This comparison shows the new data to be a reasonable representation of SiO 2 values measured on the ground over the conterminous USA. We recommend the approach of combining geochemical and mineralogical information to estimate missing SiO 2 and LOI by the recursive inversion approach in datasets elsewhere, with the caveat to always validate results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis
Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (GEEA) is a co-owned journal of the Geological Society of London and the Association of Applied Geochemists (AAG). GEEA focuses on mineral exploration using geochemistry; related fields also covered include geoanalysis, the development of methods and techniques used to analyse geochemical materials such as rocks, soils, sediments, waters and vegetation, and environmental issues associated with mining and source apportionment. GEEA is well-known for its thematic sets on hot topics and regularly publishes papers from the biennial International Applied Geochemistry Symposium (IAGS). Papers that seek to integrate geological, geochemical and geophysical methods of exploration are particularly welcome, as are those that concern geochemical mapping and those that comprise case histories. Given the many links between exploration and environmental geochemistry, the journal encourages the exchange of concepts and data; in particular, to differentiate various sources of elements. GEEA publishes research articles; discussion papers; book reviews; editorial content and thematic sets.
期刊最新文献
Multi-element geochemical analyses on ultrafine soils in Western Australia - Towards establishing abundance ranges in mineral exploration settings Alteration assemblage characterization using machine learning applied to high resolution drill-core images, hyperspectral data, and geochemistry Silver, cobalt and nickel mineralogy and geochemistry of shale ore in the sediment-hosted stratiform Nowa Sól Cu-Ag deposit, SW Poland Estimating the silica content and loss-on-ignition in the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes datasets: a recursive inversion approach Spatial distribution, ecological risk and origin of soil heavy metals in Laoguanhe watershed of the Middle Route of China's South-to-North Water Diversion Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1