《欧洲中世纪文学的开端》,马克·钦卡、克里斯托弗·杨主编(书评)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1353/mlr.2023.a907838
{"title":"《欧洲中世纪文学的开端》,马克·钦卡、克里斯托弗·杨主编(书评)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages ed. by Mark Chinca and Christopher Young Wendy Scase Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages. Ed. by Mark Chinca and Christopher Young. (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2022. xii+ 339 pp. £75. ISBN 978–1–108–47764–2. The contributors to Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages were asked to address the question 'When and how did literature begin in your vernacular?' (p. xi). The essays, covering literatures from Arabic to Welsh, address this brief in different ways. Some speculate on the social, linguistic, and material conditions that shape literary emergence. Stephen G. Nichols's Foreword sets the scene with a case study of the famously multilingual Strasbourg Oaths (ce 842), in which multilingualism, Nichols suggests, marks 'sociocultural hierarchies, a phenomenon that becomes ever more pronounced with the subsequent advent of court culture' (p. 3). Laura Ashe argues that the emergence of Old English literature was 'reliant on the highest levels of society for both audience and patronage' (p. 77), whereas Middle English appeared 'in a strange combination of ephemerality, necessity, and ambition' (p. 84). Fritz van Oostrom tells the story of early Dutch literature in terms of language contact—which he suggests 'may well be a fundamental condition for any literary beginning' (p. 137). Denis Hult reflects on the conditions that led to the establishment of a French literary tradition in England 'at least a generation' before the foundation of one on the Continent (p. 118). Roberta Frank's lively essay on Scandinavia describes beginnings as a hybrid of European models of textuality and local traditions. Other contributors focus on terms and categories. For Mark Chinca and Christopher Young the beginnings of German literature depend on what one means by 'literature'. For Sarah Kay, 'beginnings' are recognizable only in hindsight, and are different from 'openings' that have many possible futures—or none. Occitan literature begins 'only after several centuries of openings' (p. 165). Marina S. Brownlee asks what counts as 'Spain' when cultural and political boundaries are shifting and porous. Certain chapters are concerned with the history of literatures for which there is no or little contemporaneous evidence. Barry Lewis's chapter on Irish and Welsh reconstructs the earliest literary activity in Irish using later evidence and cautious inference, but 'the evidence is too fragmentary' (p. 64) for this method to work for Welsh. K. P. Clarke treats fragments of early Italian vernacular poetry as evidence for literary beginnings, contrasting these serendipitous survivals (e.g. a fragment used as a book cover) with three songbooks from c. 1300 that mark the end of the beginning. Simon Franklin outlines the problematic evidence for a tradition of East Slavonic court literature. The Tale of Igor's Campaign 'laments the passing of a golden age of Rus strength in unity' (p. 290) but the manuscript was discovered (apparently) in the 1790s and burnt in Moscow in 1812. It may have been a forgery. Perhaps the most exciting chapters call for understanding of literary beginnings [End Page 580] as 'a dynamic part of a broader interconnected medieval European literary system' (p. 267), as Panagiotis A. Agapitos puts it in his critique of vernacular and learned categories in the study of medieval Greek literature. Julia Verkholantsev's brilliant chapter on Czech and Croatian uses Iurii Lotman's model of literature as a dynamic semiotic system, proposing that it provides a way of moving beyond histories organized around the principle of a literature in a national (vernacular) language' (p. 249). And yet this systemic approach is not without its problems, as David Wallace's Afterword reminds us: seeking a literary system can lead to a 'totalising narrative' (p. 302) that normalizes cultural centres and peripheries as givens. One hopes that some future volume will find ways of pursuing the agenda modelled by Verkholantsev and Agapitos while paying due regard to Wallace's cautions. Although Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages aims to disrupt our uniform concept of a national language' (p. 18) and ideas that literatures have an uninterrrupted history down to the present day' (p. 19), the volume is organized around modern national languages...","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages ed. by Mark Chinca and Christopher Young (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages ed. by Mark Chinca and Christopher Young Wendy Scase Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages. Ed. by Mark Chinca and Christopher Young. (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2022. xii+ 339 pp. £75. ISBN 978–1–108–47764–2. The contributors to Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages were asked to address the question 'When and how did literature begin in your vernacular?' (p. xi). The essays, covering literatures from Arabic to Welsh, address this brief in different ways. Some speculate on the social, linguistic, and material conditions that shape literary emergence. Stephen G. Nichols's Foreword sets the scene with a case study of the famously multilingual Strasbourg Oaths (ce 842), in which multilingualism, Nichols suggests, marks 'sociocultural hierarchies, a phenomenon that becomes ever more pronounced with the subsequent advent of court culture' (p. 3). Laura Ashe argues that the emergence of Old English literature was 'reliant on the highest levels of society for both audience and patronage' (p. 77), whereas Middle English appeared 'in a strange combination of ephemerality, necessity, and ambition' (p. 84). Fritz van Oostrom tells the story of early Dutch literature in terms of language contact—which he suggests 'may well be a fundamental condition for any literary beginning' (p. 137). Denis Hult reflects on the conditions that led to the establishment of a French literary tradition in England 'at least a generation' before the foundation of one on the Continent (p. 118). Roberta Frank's lively essay on Scandinavia describes beginnings as a hybrid of European models of textuality and local traditions. Other contributors focus on terms and categories. For Mark Chinca and Christopher Young the beginnings of German literature depend on what one means by 'literature'. For Sarah Kay, 'beginnings' are recognizable only in hindsight, and are different from 'openings' that have many possible futures—or none. Occitan literature begins 'only after several centuries of openings' (p. 165). Marina S. Brownlee asks what counts as 'Spain' when cultural and political boundaries are shifting and porous. Certain chapters are concerned with the history of literatures for which there is no or little contemporaneous evidence. Barry Lewis's chapter on Irish and Welsh reconstructs the earliest literary activity in Irish using later evidence and cautious inference, but 'the evidence is too fragmentary' (p. 64) for this method to work for Welsh. K. P. Clarke treats fragments of early Italian vernacular poetry as evidence for literary beginnings, contrasting these serendipitous survivals (e.g. a fragment used as a book cover) with three songbooks from c. 1300 that mark the end of the beginning. Simon Franklin outlines the problematic evidence for a tradition of East Slavonic court literature. The Tale of Igor's Campaign 'laments the passing of a golden age of Rus strength in unity' (p. 290) but the manuscript was discovered (apparently) in the 1790s and burnt in Moscow in 1812. It may have been a forgery. Perhaps the most exciting chapters call for understanding of literary beginnings [End Page 580] as 'a dynamic part of a broader interconnected medieval European literary system' (p. 267), as Panagiotis A. Agapitos puts it in his critique of vernacular and learned categories in the study of medieval Greek literature. Julia Verkholantsev's brilliant chapter on Czech and Croatian uses Iurii Lotman's model of literature as a dynamic semiotic system, proposing that it provides a way of moving beyond histories organized around the principle of a literature in a national (vernacular) language' (p. 249). And yet this systemic approach is not without its problems, as David Wallace's Afterword reminds us: seeking a literary system can lead to a 'totalising narrative' (p. 302) that normalizes cultural centres and peripheries as givens. One hopes that some future volume will find ways of pursuing the agenda modelled by Verkholantsev and Agapitos while paying due regard to Wallace's cautions. Although Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages aims to disrupt our uniform concept of a national language' (p. 18) and ideas that literatures have an uninterrrupted history down to the present day' (p. 19), the volume is organized around modern national languages...\",\"PeriodicalId\":45399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907838\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

书评:《欧洲中世纪文学的开端》,作者:马克·钦卡和克里斯托弗·杨,温迪·斯凯斯。马克·钦卡和克里斯托弗·杨主编。(剑桥中世纪文学研究)剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2022。12 + 339页,售价75英镑。ISBN 978-1-108-47764-2。《欧洲中世纪文学的开端》一书的撰稿人被要求回答这样一个问题:“你的母语文学是何时以及如何开始的?”(第11页)。这些论文涵盖了从阿拉伯语到威尔士语的文献,以不同的方式论述了这一要点。一些人推测形成文学的社会、语言和物质条件。斯蒂芬·g·尼科尔斯(Stephen G. Nichols)的前言以著名的多语言斯特拉斯堡宣誓(公元842年)的案例研究为背景,尼科尔斯认为,多语言标志着“社会文化等级,随着宫廷文化的出现,这种现象变得越来越明显”(第3页)。劳拉·阿什(Laura Ashe)认为,古英语文学的出现“依赖于社会最高阶层的观众和赞助”(第77页)。而中古英语则“以一种短暂性、必要性和野心的奇怪组合”出现(第84页)。Fritz van Oostrom从语言接触的角度讲述了早期荷兰文学的故事,他认为“这可能是任何文学开端的基本条件”(第137页)。丹尼斯·霍特(Denis Hult)反思了导致法国文学传统在英国“至少一代人”之前在欧洲大陆建立起来的条件(第118页)。罗伯塔·弗兰克(Roberta Frank)关于斯堪的纳维亚半岛的生动文章将其描述为欧洲文本模式和当地传统的混合体。其他贡献者则关注术语和类别。对于马克·钦卡和克里斯托弗·杨来说,德国文学的起源取决于人们对“文学”的定义。对莎拉·凯来说,“开始”是事后才知道的,与“开始”不同,“开始”有很多可能的未来,或者没有未来。欧西坦文学“只是在几个世纪的开放之后才开始”(第165页)。玛丽娜·s·布朗利(Marina S. Brownlee)问,当文化和政治界限不断变化、漏洞百出时,什么才算“西班牙”。某些章节关注的是没有或很少有同时代证据的文学史。巴里·刘易斯关于爱尔兰和威尔士的章节使用后来的证据和谨慎的推断重建了爱尔兰最早的文学活动,但是“证据太零碎了”(第64页),这种方法不适用于威尔士。K. P. Clarke将早期意大利白话诗歌的碎片作为文学起源的证据,将这些偶然的幸存(例如用作书籍封面的碎片)与大约1300年的三本歌曲集进行对比,这些歌曲集标志着开始的结束。西蒙·富兰克林概述了东斯拉夫宫廷文学传统的可疑证据。《伊戈尔战役的故事》“哀叹罗斯统一力量的黄金时代的逝去”(第290页),但手稿(显然)在18世纪90年代被发现,并于1812年在莫斯科被烧毁。它可能是伪造的。也许最激动人心的章节要求把文学的起源(End Page 580)理解为“一个更广泛的相互联系的中世纪欧洲文学系统的一个动态部分”(第267页),正如Panagiotis a . Agapitos在他对中世纪希腊文学研究中的白话和学术类别的批评中所说的那样。Julia Verkholantsev在关于捷克语和克罗地亚语的精彩章节中使用了Iurii Lotman的文学模型作为一个动态的符号学系统,提出它提供了一种超越围绕民族(方言)语言文学原则组织的历史的方法。然而,这种系统化的方法并非没有问题,正如大卫·华莱士在《后记》中提醒我们的那样:寻求一种文学系统可能导致一种“全盘叙事”(第302页),这种叙事将文化中心和外围常态化。人们希望未来的一些著作能够在适当考虑华莱士的警告的同时,找到遵循Verkholantsev和Agapitos所模拟的议程的方法。尽管《欧洲中世纪的文学起源》旨在打破我们对民族语言的统一概念(第18页)和文学直到今天都有不间断的历史的想法(第19页),但这本书是围绕现代民族语言组织的……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages ed. by Mark Chinca and Christopher Young (review)
Reviewed by: Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages ed. by Mark Chinca and Christopher Young Wendy Scase Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages. Ed. by Mark Chinca and Christopher Young. (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2022. xii+ 339 pp. £75. ISBN 978–1–108–47764–2. The contributors to Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages were asked to address the question 'When and how did literature begin in your vernacular?' (p. xi). The essays, covering literatures from Arabic to Welsh, address this brief in different ways. Some speculate on the social, linguistic, and material conditions that shape literary emergence. Stephen G. Nichols's Foreword sets the scene with a case study of the famously multilingual Strasbourg Oaths (ce 842), in which multilingualism, Nichols suggests, marks 'sociocultural hierarchies, a phenomenon that becomes ever more pronounced with the subsequent advent of court culture' (p. 3). Laura Ashe argues that the emergence of Old English literature was 'reliant on the highest levels of society for both audience and patronage' (p. 77), whereas Middle English appeared 'in a strange combination of ephemerality, necessity, and ambition' (p. 84). Fritz van Oostrom tells the story of early Dutch literature in terms of language contact—which he suggests 'may well be a fundamental condition for any literary beginning' (p. 137). Denis Hult reflects on the conditions that led to the establishment of a French literary tradition in England 'at least a generation' before the foundation of one on the Continent (p. 118). Roberta Frank's lively essay on Scandinavia describes beginnings as a hybrid of European models of textuality and local traditions. Other contributors focus on terms and categories. For Mark Chinca and Christopher Young the beginnings of German literature depend on what one means by 'literature'. For Sarah Kay, 'beginnings' are recognizable only in hindsight, and are different from 'openings' that have many possible futures—or none. Occitan literature begins 'only after several centuries of openings' (p. 165). Marina S. Brownlee asks what counts as 'Spain' when cultural and political boundaries are shifting and porous. Certain chapters are concerned with the history of literatures for which there is no or little contemporaneous evidence. Barry Lewis's chapter on Irish and Welsh reconstructs the earliest literary activity in Irish using later evidence and cautious inference, but 'the evidence is too fragmentary' (p. 64) for this method to work for Welsh. K. P. Clarke treats fragments of early Italian vernacular poetry as evidence for literary beginnings, contrasting these serendipitous survivals (e.g. a fragment used as a book cover) with three songbooks from c. 1300 that mark the end of the beginning. Simon Franklin outlines the problematic evidence for a tradition of East Slavonic court literature. The Tale of Igor's Campaign 'laments the passing of a golden age of Rus strength in unity' (p. 290) but the manuscript was discovered (apparently) in the 1790s and burnt in Moscow in 1812. It may have been a forgery. Perhaps the most exciting chapters call for understanding of literary beginnings [End Page 580] as 'a dynamic part of a broader interconnected medieval European literary system' (p. 267), as Panagiotis A. Agapitos puts it in his critique of vernacular and learned categories in the study of medieval Greek literature. Julia Verkholantsev's brilliant chapter on Czech and Croatian uses Iurii Lotman's model of literature as a dynamic semiotic system, proposing that it provides a way of moving beyond histories organized around the principle of a literature in a national (vernacular) language' (p. 249). And yet this systemic approach is not without its problems, as David Wallace's Afterword reminds us: seeking a literary system can lead to a 'totalising narrative' (p. 302) that normalizes cultural centres and peripheries as givens. One hopes that some future volume will find ways of pursuing the agenda modelled by Verkholantsev and Agapitos while paying due regard to Wallace's cautions. Although Literary Beginnings in the European Middle Ages aims to disrupt our uniform concept of a national language' (p. 18) and ideas that literatures have an uninterrrupted history down to the present day' (p. 19), the volume is organized around modern national languages...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: With an unbroken publication record since 1905, its 1248 pages are divided between articles, predominantly on medieval and modern literature, in the languages of continental Europe, together with English (including the United States and the Commonwealth), Francophone Africa and Canada, and Latin America. In addition, MLR reviews over five hundred books each year The MLR Supplement The Modern Language Review was founded in 1905 and has included well over 3,000 articles and some 20,000 book reviews. This supplement to Volume 100 is published by the Modern Humanities Research Association in celebration of the centenary of its flagship journal.
期刊最新文献
Opak: Schatten der Erkenntnis in Paul Celans 'Meridian' und im Gedicht 'Schwanengefahr' by Chiara Caradonna (review) Baroque Sovereignty Reconsidered: Walter Benjamin Quotes Diego Saavedra Fajardo Surrealist Women's Writing: A Critical Exploration ed. by Anna Watz (review) Cultural Translations in Medieval Romance ed. by Victoria Flood and Megan G. Leitch (review) Making Italy Anglican: Why the Book of Common Prayer Was Translated into Italian by Stefano Villani (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1