Tara E. Brennan, Robert G. Nicholas, Antoinette R. Esce
{"title":"带蒂鼻中隔瓣不能重建大面积复合鼻部缺损:对侧带血管的旁系颅周瓣对前额瓣重建的低冲击","authors":"Tara E. Brennan, Robert G. Nicholas, Antoinette R. Esce","doi":"10.1089/fpsamv.2023.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Large composite nasal defects are difficult to reconstruct. Among the many concerns in reconstruction, restoration of nasal respiratory function is paramount. Ideally, reconstructed nasal lining is thin and not overly prone to dryness. When radiation treatment is anticipated, vascularized nasal lining is particularly important to resist contracture. Materials and Methods: Here we describe a method of nasal lining reconstruction using a frontal pericranial flap when a contralateral paramedian forehead flap is being elevated for reconstruction of the nasal skin defect. Results: The pericranial flap is thin and minimally reduces the airway diameter while being wide enough to cover the undersurface of any structural grafting that will be used in the reconstruction. Conclusion: The pericranial flap is an excellent reconstruction option when pedicled septal flaps are not an option. It is accessed through the same incision as the forehead skin flap and adds little additional time and no additional surgical sites. This flap may also be a better fit for the nose than free tissue transfer options that reline the nasal cavity with skin, and does not require microvascular expertise to perform. Tara E. Brennan, MD, the senior and corresponding author, conceptualized the study. Also worked on data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, and writing of the original and subsequent drafts. Robert G. Nicholas, MD, worked on data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing review. Antoinette R. Esce, MD, worked on methodology, particularly with respect to editing and composition of the video, project administration, and critical editing of the video. No competing financial interests exist. No funding was received for this article. Runtime of video: 4 mins 53 secs","PeriodicalId":114978,"journal":{"name":"FPSAM Video Journal","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstruction of Large Composite Nasal Defects When Pedicled Septal Flaps are Not an Option: The Low-Impact Addition of a Vascularized Contralateral Paramedian Pericranial Flap to Forehead Flap Reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Tara E. Brennan, Robert G. Nicholas, Antoinette R. Esce\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/fpsamv.2023.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Large composite nasal defects are difficult to reconstruct. Among the many concerns in reconstruction, restoration of nasal respiratory function is paramount. Ideally, reconstructed nasal lining is thin and not overly prone to dryness. When radiation treatment is anticipated, vascularized nasal lining is particularly important to resist contracture. Materials and Methods: Here we describe a method of nasal lining reconstruction using a frontal pericranial flap when a contralateral paramedian forehead flap is being elevated for reconstruction of the nasal skin defect. Results: The pericranial flap is thin and minimally reduces the airway diameter while being wide enough to cover the undersurface of any structural grafting that will be used in the reconstruction. Conclusion: The pericranial flap is an excellent reconstruction option when pedicled septal flaps are not an option. It is accessed through the same incision as the forehead skin flap and adds little additional time and no additional surgical sites. This flap may also be a better fit for the nose than free tissue transfer options that reline the nasal cavity with skin, and does not require microvascular expertise to perform. Tara E. Brennan, MD, the senior and corresponding author, conceptualized the study. Also worked on data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, and writing of the original and subsequent drafts. Robert G. Nicholas, MD, worked on data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing review. Antoinette R. Esce, MD, worked on methodology, particularly with respect to editing and composition of the video, project administration, and critical editing of the video. No competing financial interests exist. No funding was received for this article. Runtime of video: 4 mins 53 secs\",\"PeriodicalId\":114978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FPSAM Video Journal\",\"volume\":\"153 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FPSAM Video Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsamv.2023.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FPSAM Video Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsamv.2023.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:大的复合鼻缺损是难以重建的。在鼻部重建的诸多问题中,鼻呼吸功能的恢复是最重要的。理想的情况是,重建的鼻粘膜薄,不太容易干燥。当预期进行放射治疗时,带血管的鼻内膜对于抵抗挛缩尤为重要。材料和方法:在此,我们描述了一种使用额部颅周皮瓣重建鼻粘膜的方法,同时将对侧旁正中额部皮瓣提升以重建鼻皮肤缺损。结果:颅周皮瓣薄,最小限度地减小了气道直径,同时足够宽,覆盖任何结构移植的下表面,将用于重建。结论:当带蒂鼻中隔瓣不能重建时,颅周瓣是一种很好的重建选择。它通过与前额皮瓣相同的切口进入,增加了很少的额外时间和没有额外的手术部位。这种皮瓣也可能比用皮肤固定鼻腔的自由组织移植更适合鼻子,而且不需要微血管专家来操作。资深通讯作者塔拉·布伦南博士对这项研究进行了概念化。还参与了数据管理、正式分析、调查、方法论、项目管理、监督、验证以及原始和后续草稿的撰写。罗伯特·g·尼古拉斯,医学博士,从事数据管理、正式分析、调查、方法论和写作审查。Antoinette R. Esce,医学博士,研究方法论,特别是关于视频的编辑和组成、项目管理和视频的关键编辑。不存在相互竞争的经济利益。本文未收到任何资助。影片时长:4分53秒
Reconstruction of Large Composite Nasal Defects When Pedicled Septal Flaps are Not an Option: The Low-Impact Addition of a Vascularized Contralateral Paramedian Pericranial Flap to Forehead Flap Reconstruction
Introduction: Large composite nasal defects are difficult to reconstruct. Among the many concerns in reconstruction, restoration of nasal respiratory function is paramount. Ideally, reconstructed nasal lining is thin and not overly prone to dryness. When radiation treatment is anticipated, vascularized nasal lining is particularly important to resist contracture. Materials and Methods: Here we describe a method of nasal lining reconstruction using a frontal pericranial flap when a contralateral paramedian forehead flap is being elevated for reconstruction of the nasal skin defect. Results: The pericranial flap is thin and minimally reduces the airway diameter while being wide enough to cover the undersurface of any structural grafting that will be used in the reconstruction. Conclusion: The pericranial flap is an excellent reconstruction option when pedicled septal flaps are not an option. It is accessed through the same incision as the forehead skin flap and adds little additional time and no additional surgical sites. This flap may also be a better fit for the nose than free tissue transfer options that reline the nasal cavity with skin, and does not require microvascular expertise to perform. Tara E. Brennan, MD, the senior and corresponding author, conceptualized the study. Also worked on data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, and writing of the original and subsequent drafts. Robert G. Nicholas, MD, worked on data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing review. Antoinette R. Esce, MD, worked on methodology, particularly with respect to editing and composition of the video, project administration, and critical editing of the video. No competing financial interests exist. No funding was received for this article. Runtime of video: 4 mins 53 secs