《2030年领土议程》是关于地方和更具凝聚力的欧洲领土吗?

IF 2 Q3 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING Planning Practice and Research Pub Date : 2023-09-03 DOI:10.1080/02697459.2023.2258029
Kai Böhme, Sina Redlich
{"title":"《2030年领土议程》是关于地方和更具凝聚力的欧洲领土吗?","authors":"Kai Böhme, Sina Redlich","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2023.2258029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTEurope faces the challenge of ensuring positive perspectives for all places and people. This requires rethinking cohesion, and the way cohesion is delivered. The Territorial Agenda 2030 offers a strategic reference point that sets priorities towards a more balanced, harmonious and cohesive development. Previously, the Territorial Agenda has been limited in implementing these ambitions. The article argues that, despite persisting limitations, the Territorial Agenda 2030 has moved towards making changes on two levels: A renewed cohesion understanding and an active implementation of it. However, the question remains whether it could generate enough momentum to move beyond keeping the intergovernmental policy process alive.KEYWORDS: Territorial AgendaCohesion Spiritterritorial cohesionEuropeeighth Cohesion Report Disclosure statementThe authors are professionally involved in the work with the Territorial Agenda. The article expresses the authors’ personal observations and opinions.","PeriodicalId":54201,"journal":{"name":"Planning Practice and Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Territorial Agenda 2030 for places and a more cohesive European territory?\",\"authors\":\"Kai Böhme, Sina Redlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02697459.2023.2258029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTEurope faces the challenge of ensuring positive perspectives for all places and people. This requires rethinking cohesion, and the way cohesion is delivered. The Territorial Agenda 2030 offers a strategic reference point that sets priorities towards a more balanced, harmonious and cohesive development. Previously, the Territorial Agenda has been limited in implementing these ambitions. The article argues that, despite persisting limitations, the Territorial Agenda 2030 has moved towards making changes on two levels: A renewed cohesion understanding and an active implementation of it. However, the question remains whether it could generate enough momentum to move beyond keeping the intergovernmental policy process alive.KEYWORDS: Territorial AgendaCohesion Spiritterritorial cohesionEuropeeighth Cohesion Report Disclosure statementThe authors are professionally involved in the work with the Territorial Agenda. The article expresses the authors’ personal observations and opinions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2258029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2258029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲面临着确保所有地方和人民的积极前景的挑战。这需要重新思考内聚,以及内聚的交付方式。《2030年领土议程》提供了一个战略参考点,为实现更加平衡、和谐和有凝聚力的发展确定了优先事项。以前,《领土议程》在执行这些目标方面受到限制。文章认为,尽管存在局限性,《2030年领土议程》已朝着在两个层面上做出改变的方向发展:重新认识凝聚力和积极实施该议程。然而,问题仍然是,它能否产生足够的动力,超越维持政府间政策进程。关键词:领土议程凝聚力精神领土凝聚力欧洲第八凝聚力报告披露声明作者专业参与领土议程的工作。这篇文章表达了作者个人的观察和观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Territorial Agenda 2030 for places and a more cohesive European territory?
ABSTRACTEurope faces the challenge of ensuring positive perspectives for all places and people. This requires rethinking cohesion, and the way cohesion is delivered. The Territorial Agenda 2030 offers a strategic reference point that sets priorities towards a more balanced, harmonious and cohesive development. Previously, the Territorial Agenda has been limited in implementing these ambitions. The article argues that, despite persisting limitations, the Territorial Agenda 2030 has moved towards making changes on two levels: A renewed cohesion understanding and an active implementation of it. However, the question remains whether it could generate enough momentum to move beyond keeping the intergovernmental policy process alive.KEYWORDS: Territorial AgendaCohesion Spiritterritorial cohesionEuropeeighth Cohesion Report Disclosure statementThe authors are professionally involved in the work with the Territorial Agenda. The article expresses the authors’ personal observations and opinions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Planning Practice and Research
Planning Practice and Research REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Over the last decade, Planning Practice & Research (PPR) has established itself as the source for information on current research in planning practice. It is intended for reflective, critical academics, professionals and students who are concerned to keep abreast of and challenge current thinking. PPR is committed to: •bridging the gaps between planning research, practice and education, and between different planning systems •providing a forum for an international readership to discuss and review research on planning practice
期刊最新文献
Scenario planning and planning support systems tested in a graduate-level planning studio in Bogotá The (unprivileged) polluter pays: Conflict of Rights in Delhi’s stormwater drain-adjacent ‘informal’ settlements Civilizing practices and created spaces: resistance processes in the San Francisco (Paraguay) and Ismael Silva-Zé Keti (Brazil) housing projects Shifts in planning tradition amid an economic crisis and in light of a planning reform: the case of Greece ‘What planners don’t do is plan’: recovering the English strategic spatial planning imagination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1