惯例:医疗保险对私人医疗保健的溢出效应

IF 5.6 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS American Economic Journal-Economic Policy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1257/pol.20200553
Michael Lawrence Barnett, Andrew Olenski, Adam Sacarny
{"title":"惯例:医疗保险对私人医疗保健的溢出效应","authors":"Michael Lawrence Barnett, Andrew Olenski, Adam Sacarny","doi":"10.1257/pol.20200553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efforts to raise US health-care productivity have proceeded slowly, potentially due to the fragmentation of payment across insurers. Each insurer’s efforts to improve care could influence how doctors practice for other insurers, leading to unvalued externalities. We study a randomized letter intervention by Medicare to curtail overuse of antipsychotics. The letters did not mention private insurance but reduced prescribing to these patients by 12 percent, much like the 17 percent effect in Medicare. We cannot reject onefor-one spillovers, suggesting that physicians use similar medical practice styles across insurers. Our findings establish that insurers can affect health care well outside their direct purview. (JEL D24, G22, I11, I13, I18)","PeriodicalId":48093,"journal":{"name":"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common Practice: Spillovers from Medicare on Private Health Care\",\"authors\":\"Michael Lawrence Barnett, Andrew Olenski, Adam Sacarny\",\"doi\":\"10.1257/pol.20200553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Efforts to raise US health-care productivity have proceeded slowly, potentially due to the fragmentation of payment across insurers. Each insurer’s efforts to improve care could influence how doctors practice for other insurers, leading to unvalued externalities. We study a randomized letter intervention by Medicare to curtail overuse of antipsychotics. The letters did not mention private insurance but reduced prescribing to these patients by 12 percent, much like the 17 percent effect in Medicare. We cannot reject onefor-one spillovers, suggesting that physicians use similar medical practice styles across insurers. Our findings establish that insurers can affect health care well outside their direct purview. (JEL D24, G22, I11, I13, I18)\",\"PeriodicalId\":48093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200553\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200553","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高美国医疗保健生产率的努力进展缓慢,可能是由于保险公司之间的支付方式分散。每家保险公司改善医疗服务的努力可能会影响医生为其他保险公司服务的方式,从而导致无法估量的外部性。我们研究了一个随机字母干预的医疗保险,以减少过度使用抗精神病药物。这些信件没有提到私人保险,但将对这些患者的处方减少了12%,很像医疗保险中17%的效果。我们不能拒绝一对一的溢出效应,这表明医生在不同的保险公司使用相似的医疗实践风格。我们的研究结果表明,保险公司可以在其直接权限之外很好地影响医疗保健。(jel d24, g22, i11, i13, i18)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Common Practice: Spillovers from Medicare on Private Health Care
Efforts to raise US health-care productivity have proceeded slowly, potentially due to the fragmentation of payment across insurers. Each insurer’s efforts to improve care could influence how doctors practice for other insurers, leading to unvalued externalities. We study a randomized letter intervention by Medicare to curtail overuse of antipsychotics. The letters did not mention private insurance but reduced prescribing to these patients by 12 percent, much like the 17 percent effect in Medicare. We cannot reject onefor-one spillovers, suggesting that physicians use similar medical practice styles across insurers. Our findings establish that insurers can affect health care well outside their direct purview. (JEL D24, G22, I11, I13, I18)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.90%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Economic Review (AER) is a general-interest economics journal. The journal publishes 12 issues containing articles on a broad range of topics. Established in 1911, the AER is among the nation's oldest and most respected scholarly journals in economics. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy publishes papers covering a range of topics, the common theme being the role of economic policy in economic outcomes. Subject areas include public economics; urban and regional economics; public policy aspects of health, education, welfare and political institutions; law and economics; economic regulation; and environmental and natural resource economics.
期刊最新文献
Moved to Poverty? A Legacy of the Apartheid Experiment in South Africa Public Pension Reforms and Retirement Decisions: Narrative Evidence and Aggregate Implications Digitization and the Market for Physical Works: Evidence from the Google Books Project Information and Spillovers from Targeting Policy in Peru’s Anchoveta Fishery Market Power and Price Exposure: Learning from Changes in Renewable Energy Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1