学生冲突恢复力的性格预测因素

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Social Psychology and Society Pub Date : 2023-04-11 DOI:10.17759/sps.2023140106
N.N. Lepekhin, V.G. Kruglov, M.A. Kruglova, N.V. Tikhomirova, M.A. Iashina
{"title":"学生冲突恢复力的性格预测因素","authors":"N.N. Lepekhin, V.G. Kruglov, M.A. Kruglova, N.V. Tikhomirova, M.A. Iashina","doi":"10.17759/sps.2023140106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Objective. </strong>The study of dispositional predictors of students' conflict resilience.<br><strong>Background. </strong>Against the background of the consequences of self-isolation and the limitations of real communication, it is relevant to study resilience to conflicts as an important communicative and professional characteristic of social self-determination. The study of dispositional predictors of conflict resilience allows creating scientifically based programs for its formation among students.<br><strong>Study design. </strong>The influence of the severity of stress, aggression, empathy, assertiveness and other independent variables on conflict resilience, considered as a dependent variable, was studied. Statistical hypotheses were verified by means of factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM).<br><strong>Participants. </strong>The sample consisted of students of the natural sciences and humanities faculties of St. Petersburg State University in the number of 205 people, 49 of them men (24%) and 156 women (76%), aged 17 to 27 years, the median value is 19 years.<br><strong>Methods (tools).</strong> Questionnaire Determination of the level of conflict resilience (N.P. Fetiskin, V.V. Kozlov, G.M. Manuilov); Personality assertiveness test (V.P. Sheinov); PSM-25 psychological stress scale, in adaptation by Vodopyanova N.E.; diagnostic questionnaire for empathy A. Mehrabian, N. Epstein; diagnostic questionnaire for indicators and forms of aggression A. Bass, A. Darkey.<br><strong>Results. </strong>Because of confirmatory factor analysis, the variables stress, hostility, irritation were combined into the factor \"paranoia\" (suspicion, suspiciousness, resentment, stress and irritability). The variables verbal, physical, indirect types of aggression and negativism are combined into the factor \"aggressiveness\" (contradiction to the norms of society and the focus on causing harm to others). The variables empathy, assertiveness (&amp;ndash;), guilt are combined into the \"tolerance\" factor (empathy, the desire to understand the reasons for the behavior of another, compliance and auto-aggression due to regular sacrifice of one's own interests). The joint influence of these factors on conflict resistance was revealed, the total variance is 55%. \"Paranoia\" and \"aggression\" reduce conflict resilience and promote conflict striving, \"tolerance\" enhances conflict resilience, but at high values, causes conflict avoidance.<br><strong>Conclusions. </strong>Psychological dispositions that affect conflict resilience can be combined into three factors: paranoia, aggression, tolerance, which have a multidirectional effect. Paranoia and aggression promote conflict-seeking behavior and reduce conflict resilience. Tolerance increases conflict resilience, but contributes to conflict avoidance. This conflict resilience dynamics can be described by an inverted V-shaped curve, which shows that conflict resilience arises because of a balance of the identified factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":54079,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dispositional Predictors of Students' Conflict Resilience\",\"authors\":\"N.N. Lepekhin, V.G. Kruglov, M.A. Kruglova, N.V. Tikhomirova, M.A. Iashina\",\"doi\":\"10.17759/sps.2023140106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p style=\\\"text-align: justify;\\\"><strong>Objective. </strong>The study of dispositional predictors of students' conflict resilience.<br><strong>Background. </strong>Against the background of the consequences of self-isolation and the limitations of real communication, it is relevant to study resilience to conflicts as an important communicative and professional characteristic of social self-determination. The study of dispositional predictors of conflict resilience allows creating scientifically based programs for its formation among students.<br><strong>Study design. </strong>The influence of the severity of stress, aggression, empathy, assertiveness and other independent variables on conflict resilience, considered as a dependent variable, was studied. Statistical hypotheses were verified by means of factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM).<br><strong>Participants. </strong>The sample consisted of students of the natural sciences and humanities faculties of St. Petersburg State University in the number of 205 people, 49 of them men (24%) and 156 women (76%), aged 17 to 27 years, the median value is 19 years.<br><strong>Methods (tools).</strong> Questionnaire Determination of the level of conflict resilience (N.P. Fetiskin, V.V. Kozlov, G.M. Manuilov); Personality assertiveness test (V.P. Sheinov); PSM-25 psychological stress scale, in adaptation by Vodopyanova N.E.; diagnostic questionnaire for empathy A. Mehrabian, N. Epstein; diagnostic questionnaire for indicators and forms of aggression A. Bass, A. Darkey.<br><strong>Results. </strong>Because of confirmatory factor analysis, the variables stress, hostility, irritation were combined into the factor \\\"paranoia\\\" (suspicion, suspiciousness, resentment, stress and irritability). The variables verbal, physical, indirect types of aggression and negativism are combined into the factor \\\"aggressiveness\\\" (contradiction to the norms of society and the focus on causing harm to others). The variables empathy, assertiveness (&amp;ndash;), guilt are combined into the \\\"tolerance\\\" factor (empathy, the desire to understand the reasons for the behavior of another, compliance and auto-aggression due to regular sacrifice of one's own interests). The joint influence of these factors on conflict resistance was revealed, the total variance is 55%. \\\"Paranoia\\\" and \\\"aggression\\\" reduce conflict resilience and promote conflict striving, \\\"tolerance\\\" enhances conflict resilience, but at high values, causes conflict avoidance.<br><strong>Conclusions. </strong>Psychological dispositions that affect conflict resilience can be combined into three factors: paranoia, aggression, tolerance, which have a multidirectional effect. Paranoia and aggression promote conflict-seeking behavior and reduce conflict resilience. Tolerance increases conflict resilience, but contributes to conflict avoidance. This conflict resilience dynamics can be described by an inverted V-shaped curve, which shows that conflict resilience arises because of a balance of the identified factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychology and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychology and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

p style="text-align: align;"><</strong>学生冲突适应能力的性格预测因素研究。<br><strong></strong>在自我孤立的后果和真实沟通的局限性的背景下,将冲突弹性作为社会自决的重要交际和专业特征进行研究是有意义的。对冲突恢复力的性格预测因素的研究,可以为学生的冲突恢复力的形成创造基于科学的计划。</strong>研究了压力严重程度、攻击性、同理心、自信等自变量对冲突弹性的影响,并将其作为因变量。通过因子分析和结构方程模型(SEM)对统计假设进行验证。</strong>样本由圣彼得堡国立大学自然科学和人文学院的学生组成,人数为205人,其中男性49人(24%),女性156人(76%),年龄为17至27岁,中位数为19岁。<br>< /strong>冲突弹性水平的问卷测定(N.P. Fetiskin, V.V. Kozlov, G.M. Manuilov)人格自信测试(V.P. Sheinov);PSM-25心理压力量表(Vodopyanova N.E.);共情诊断问卷;A. Bass, A. Darkey.<br><strong>结果。</strong>通过验证性因子分析,将压力、敌意、刺激等变量合并为“偏执”因子(猜疑、多疑、怨恨、压力、易怒)。将言语攻击、肢体攻击、间接攻击和消极攻击等变量组合为“攻击性”因素(与社会规范相矛盾,注重对他人造成伤害)。变量共情、自信(–)、内疚被合并成“容忍”因素(共情、理解他人行为原因的愿望、服从和由于经常牺牲自己的利益而产生的自我攻击)。揭示了这些因素对冲突抗力的共同影响,总方差为55%。“偏执”和“侵略”降低了冲突弹性,促进了冲突的努力,“宽容”增强了冲突弹性,但在高值时,引起了冲突回避。影响冲突恢复力的心理倾向可以组合成三个因素:偏执、侵略、宽容,这三个因素有多向的影响。偏执狂和攻击性会促进寻求冲突的行为,降低冲突适应能力。宽容能增强冲突复原力,但有助于避免冲突。这种冲突弹性动态可以用倒v型曲线来描述,这表明冲突弹性的产生是由于已识别因素的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dispositional Predictors of Students' Conflict Resilience

Objective. The study of dispositional predictors of students' conflict resilience.
Background. Against the background of the consequences of self-isolation and the limitations of real communication, it is relevant to study resilience to conflicts as an important communicative and professional characteristic of social self-determination. The study of dispositional predictors of conflict resilience allows creating scientifically based programs for its formation among students.
Study design. The influence of the severity of stress, aggression, empathy, assertiveness and other independent variables on conflict resilience, considered as a dependent variable, was studied. Statistical hypotheses were verified by means of factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM).
Participants. The sample consisted of students of the natural sciences and humanities faculties of St. Petersburg State University in the number of 205 people, 49 of them men (24%) and 156 women (76%), aged 17 to 27 years, the median value is 19 years.
Methods (tools). Questionnaire Determination of the level of conflict resilience (N.P. Fetiskin, V.V. Kozlov, G.M. Manuilov); Personality assertiveness test (V.P. Sheinov); PSM-25 psychological stress scale, in adaptation by Vodopyanova N.E.; diagnostic questionnaire for empathy A. Mehrabian, N. Epstein; diagnostic questionnaire for indicators and forms of aggression A. Bass, A. Darkey.
Results. Because of confirmatory factor analysis, the variables stress, hostility, irritation were combined into the factor "paranoia" (suspicion, suspiciousness, resentment, stress and irritability). The variables verbal, physical, indirect types of aggression and negativism are combined into the factor "aggressiveness" (contradiction to the norms of society and the focus on causing harm to others). The variables empathy, assertiveness (&ndash;), guilt are combined into the "tolerance" factor (empathy, the desire to understand the reasons for the behavior of another, compliance and auto-aggression due to regular sacrifice of one's own interests). The joint influence of these factors on conflict resistance was revealed, the total variance is 55%. "Paranoia" and "aggression" reduce conflict resilience and promote conflict striving, "tolerance" enhances conflict resilience, but at high values, causes conflict avoidance.
Conclusions. Psychological dispositions that affect conflict resilience can be combined into three factors: paranoia, aggression, tolerance, which have a multidirectional effect. Paranoia and aggression promote conflict-seeking behavior and reduce conflict resilience. Tolerance increases conflict resilience, but contributes to conflict avoidance. This conflict resilience dynamics can be described by an inverted V-shaped curve, which shows that conflict resilience arises because of a balance of the identified factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology and Society
Social Psychology and Society PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Smartphone Addiction and Its Correlations with Academic Motivation, Procrastination and Self-Control in Communication among Belarusians and Russians Psychological Criteria of Adolescent Well-being in the Context of Digital Socialization Conference in Memory of M.Y. Kondratiev: Topical Issues of Optimization of Interpersonal and Intergroup Interaction The "Relatedness-Exclusion" Scale: Creation and Validation Problematic Social Media Use: Terminology, Prevalence, Psychosocial and Somatic Comorbidity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1