1月6日在Twitter上:通过不健康的在线对话和情绪分析来衡量社会媒体对国会大厦骚乱的态度

IF 2.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Information and Telecommunication Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1080/24751839.2023.2262067
Kovacs Erik-Robert, Cotfas Liviu-Adrian, Delcea Camelia
{"title":"1月6日在Twitter上:通过不健康的在线对话和情绪分析来衡量社会媒体对国会大厦骚乱的态度","authors":"Kovacs Erik-Robert, Cotfas Liviu-Adrian, Delcea Camelia","doi":"10.1080/24751839.2023.2262067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While social media can serve as public discussion forums of great benefit to democratic debate, discourse propagated through them can also stoke political polarization and partisanship. A particularly dramatic example is the January 6, 2021 incident in Washington D.C., when a group of protesters besieged the US Capitol, resulting in several deaths. The public reacted by posting messages on social media, discussing the actions of the participants. Aiming to understand their perspectives under the broad concept of unhealthy online conversation (i.e. bad faith argumentation, overly hostile or destructive discourse, or other behaviours that discourage engagement), we sample 1,300,000 Twitter posts taken from the #Election2020 dataset dating from January 2021. Using a fine-tuned XLNet model trained on the Unhealthy Comment Corpus (UCC) dataset, we label these texts as healthy or unhealthy, furthermore using a taxonomy of 7 unhealthy attributes. Using the NRCLex sentiment analysis lexicon, we also detect the emotional patterns associated with each attribute. We observe that these conversations contain accusatory language aimed at the ‘other side’, limiting engagement by defining others in terms they do not themselves use or identify with. We find evidence of three attribute clusters, in addition to sarcasm, a divergent attribute that we argue should be researched separately. We find that emotions identified from the text do not correlate with the attributes, the two approaches revealing complementary characteristics of online discourse. Using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), we identify topics discussed within the attribute-sentiment pairs, linking them to each other using similarity measures. The results we present aim to help social media stakeholders, government regulators, and the general public better understand the contents and the emotional profile of the debates arising on social media platforms, especially as they relate to the political realm.","PeriodicalId":32180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information and Telecommunication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"January 6th on Twitter: measuring social media attitudes towards the Capitol riot through unhealthy online conversation and sentiment analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kovacs Erik-Robert, Cotfas Liviu-Adrian, Delcea Camelia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24751839.2023.2262067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While social media can serve as public discussion forums of great benefit to democratic debate, discourse propagated through them can also stoke political polarization and partisanship. A particularly dramatic example is the January 6, 2021 incident in Washington D.C., when a group of protesters besieged the US Capitol, resulting in several deaths. The public reacted by posting messages on social media, discussing the actions of the participants. Aiming to understand their perspectives under the broad concept of unhealthy online conversation (i.e. bad faith argumentation, overly hostile or destructive discourse, or other behaviours that discourage engagement), we sample 1,300,000 Twitter posts taken from the #Election2020 dataset dating from January 2021. Using a fine-tuned XLNet model trained on the Unhealthy Comment Corpus (UCC) dataset, we label these texts as healthy or unhealthy, furthermore using a taxonomy of 7 unhealthy attributes. Using the NRCLex sentiment analysis lexicon, we also detect the emotional patterns associated with each attribute. We observe that these conversations contain accusatory language aimed at the ‘other side’, limiting engagement by defining others in terms they do not themselves use or identify with. We find evidence of three attribute clusters, in addition to sarcasm, a divergent attribute that we argue should be researched separately. We find that emotions identified from the text do not correlate with the attributes, the two approaches revealing complementary characteristics of online discourse. Using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), we identify topics discussed within the attribute-sentiment pairs, linking them to each other using similarity measures. The results we present aim to help social media stakeholders, government regulators, and the general public better understand the contents and the emotional profile of the debates arising on social media platforms, especially as they relate to the political realm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information and Telecommunication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information and Telecommunication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751839.2023.2262067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information and Telecommunication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751839.2023.2262067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然社交媒体可以作为公共讨论论坛,对民主辩论大有裨益,但通过社交媒体传播的话语也可能引发政治两极分化和党派之争。一个特别戏剧性的例子是2021年1月6日在华盛顿特区发生的事件,当时一群抗议者包围了美国国会大厦,导致数人死亡。公众的反应是在社交媒体上发布消息,讨论参与者的行为。为了了解他们在不健康在线对话(即恶意争论,过度敌对或破坏性话语或其他阻碍参与的行为)的广泛概念下的观点,我们从2021年1月的#Election2020数据集中抽取了130万条推特帖子。使用在不健康评论语料库(UCC)数据集上训练的微调XLNet模型,我们将这些文本标记为健康或不健康,并进一步使用7个不健康属性的分类法。使用NRCLex情感分析词典,我们还检测与每个属性相关的情感模式。我们观察到,这些对话包含针对“对方”的指责性语言,通过用他们自己不使用或不认同的术语来定义他人,从而限制了参与。我们发现了三种属性集群的证据,除了讽刺,我们认为应该单独研究的发散属性。我们发现从文本中识别的情感与属性并不相关,这两种方法揭示了在线话语的互补特征。使用潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA),我们识别属性-情感对中讨论的主题,并使用相似度度量将它们彼此连接起来。我们提出的结果旨在帮助社交媒体利益相关者、政府监管机构和公众更好地理解社交媒体平台上出现的辩论的内容和情感特征,特别是当它们与政治领域相关时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
January 6th on Twitter: measuring social media attitudes towards the Capitol riot through unhealthy online conversation and sentiment analysis
While social media can serve as public discussion forums of great benefit to democratic debate, discourse propagated through them can also stoke political polarization and partisanship. A particularly dramatic example is the January 6, 2021 incident in Washington D.C., when a group of protesters besieged the US Capitol, resulting in several deaths. The public reacted by posting messages on social media, discussing the actions of the participants. Aiming to understand their perspectives under the broad concept of unhealthy online conversation (i.e. bad faith argumentation, overly hostile or destructive discourse, or other behaviours that discourage engagement), we sample 1,300,000 Twitter posts taken from the #Election2020 dataset dating from January 2021. Using a fine-tuned XLNet model trained on the Unhealthy Comment Corpus (UCC) dataset, we label these texts as healthy or unhealthy, furthermore using a taxonomy of 7 unhealthy attributes. Using the NRCLex sentiment analysis lexicon, we also detect the emotional patterns associated with each attribute. We observe that these conversations contain accusatory language aimed at the ‘other side’, limiting engagement by defining others in terms they do not themselves use or identify with. We find evidence of three attribute clusters, in addition to sarcasm, a divergent attribute that we argue should be researched separately. We find that emotions identified from the text do not correlate with the attributes, the two approaches revealing complementary characteristics of online discourse. Using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), we identify topics discussed within the attribute-sentiment pairs, linking them to each other using similarity measures. The results we present aim to help social media stakeholders, government regulators, and the general public better understand the contents and the emotional profile of the debates arising on social media platforms, especially as they relate to the political realm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
A fast and efficient data reuse scheme for HEVC Integer Motion Estimation hardware architecture 2TierEdge-Defense: a cascaded defense framework with rule-based LSTM for NCIFA in NDN Physical layer security in wireless sensors networks: secrecy outage probability analysis Deep learning-based human pose estimation towards artworks classification JCARP: Joint Channel Assignment and Routing Protocol for cognitive-radio-based internet of things (CRIoT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1