《在工作、在医院、或在监狱》:1838-1917年英属圭亚那监狱中的妇女

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Labour History Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.3828/labourhistory.2023.21
Estherine Adams
{"title":"《在工作、在医院、或在监狱》:1838-1917年英属圭亚那监狱中的妇女","authors":"Estherine Adams","doi":"10.3828/labourhistory.2023.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that labour, particularly female labour, was central to the expansion of colonial Guiana’s post-emancipation penal system between 1838 and 1917. It highlights the intersection of coerced labour and colonialism in the post-emancipation period, by centring the lives of incarcerated women to understand the nature of state governance in colonial spaces. It argues the plantocracy leveraged the expansion of prisons not to control crime but to control labour. As the newly constructed prisons filled, colonial and local authorities explained increased incarceration rates as a legitimate response to increased crime, supported by an evangelical rhetoric that promoted incarceration to encourage reform when it was accompanied by religious instruction and education. In practice, authorities used the prison system as a means of labour discipline, labour extraction and as a threat to secure future docility. Female indentured labourers convicted of petty crimes, including breach of contract, were often sentenced to work on plantations; creole women worked on sea defence construction and maintenance. A common refrain in the colony was that free labour could not be obtained. The malleability of prisoners as a labour force was thus attractive to the government, as prisoners could be moved, deployed and disciplined in ways that were not possible for free labour.","PeriodicalId":44167,"journal":{"name":"Labour History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“At Work, in Hospital, or in Gaol”: Women in British Guiana’s Jails, 1838–1917\",\"authors\":\"Estherine Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/labourhistory.2023.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that labour, particularly female labour, was central to the expansion of colonial Guiana’s post-emancipation penal system between 1838 and 1917. It highlights the intersection of coerced labour and colonialism in the post-emancipation period, by centring the lives of incarcerated women to understand the nature of state governance in colonial spaces. It argues the plantocracy leveraged the expansion of prisons not to control crime but to control labour. As the newly constructed prisons filled, colonial and local authorities explained increased incarceration rates as a legitimate response to increased crime, supported by an evangelical rhetoric that promoted incarceration to encourage reform when it was accompanied by religious instruction and education. In practice, authorities used the prison system as a means of labour discipline, labour extraction and as a threat to secure future docility. Female indentured labourers convicted of petty crimes, including breach of contract, were often sentenced to work on plantations; creole women worked on sea defence construction and maintenance. A common refrain in the colony was that free labour could not be obtained. The malleability of prisoners as a labour force was thus attractive to the government, as prisoners could be moved, deployed and disciplined in ways that were not possible for free labour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labour History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labour History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/labourhistory.2023.21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/labourhistory.2023.21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,劳工,尤其是女性劳工,是1838年至1917年殖民时期圭亚那解放后刑罚体系扩张的核心。它通过以被监禁妇女的生活为中心来理解殖民空间中国家治理的本质,突出了后解放时期强迫劳动和殖民主义的交集。它认为,工厂统治利用监狱的扩张不是为了控制犯罪,而是为了控制劳工。随着新建的监狱人满为患,殖民地和地方当局将监禁率的上升解释为对犯罪率上升的合理反应,并辅以福音派的言论,即在伴随着宗教指导和教育的情况下,提倡监禁以鼓励改革。在实践中,当局利用监狱制度作为劳动纪律、劳动榨取的手段,并作为确保未来顺从的威胁。被判犯有轻微罪行(包括违反合同)的女性契约劳工经常被判在种植园工作;克里奥尔妇女从事海防建设和维护工作。在殖民地,人们常说的是找不到免费劳动力。因此,囚犯作为劳动力的可塑性对政府很有吸引力,因为囚犯可以以自由劳动力无法做到的方式被调动、部署和纪律处分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“At Work, in Hospital, or in Gaol”: Women in British Guiana’s Jails, 1838–1917
This article argues that labour, particularly female labour, was central to the expansion of colonial Guiana’s post-emancipation penal system between 1838 and 1917. It highlights the intersection of coerced labour and colonialism in the post-emancipation period, by centring the lives of incarcerated women to understand the nature of state governance in colonial spaces. It argues the plantocracy leveraged the expansion of prisons not to control crime but to control labour. As the newly constructed prisons filled, colonial and local authorities explained increased incarceration rates as a legitimate response to increased crime, supported by an evangelical rhetoric that promoted incarceration to encourage reform when it was accompanied by religious instruction and education. In practice, authorities used the prison system as a means of labour discipline, labour extraction and as a threat to secure future docility. Female indentured labourers convicted of petty crimes, including breach of contract, were often sentenced to work on plantations; creole women worked on sea defence construction and maintenance. A common refrain in the colony was that free labour could not be obtained. The malleability of prisoners as a labour force was thus attractive to the government, as prisoners could be moved, deployed and disciplined in ways that were not possible for free labour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labour History
Labour History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Explaining Union Decline: Remaking Power Relations in the Pilbara Iron Ore Industry Speed-Ups and Related Problems: The UAW and Grassroots Grievances in the Immediate Post-World War II Period So How Did We Get Here? A Historical Case Study of Migrant Employment in the New Zealand Hotel Sector Shelton Stromquist, Claiming the City: A Global History of Workers’ Fight for Municipal Socialism Jared Davidson, Blood & Dirt: Prison Labour and the Making of New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1