{"title":"五个实验室常规质量测量的实验室间比较:对巴拿马和多米尼加共和国质量基础设施的贡献","authors":"","doi":"10.26461/26.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the results of a comparison between five metrology laboratories, located in Panama and the Dominican Republic, with measurements carried out from July to September 2022. The objective of the intercomparison was to evaluate the capacity of the laboratories to calibrate mass standards of class of accuracy F, in the range from 2 mg to 2 kg, as well as class M1 of 20 kg, in accordance with the provisions of the International Recommendation OIML R 111-1. Because the participants consistently had satisfactory results, it was not necessary to implement corrective actions in the participating laboratories to improve their mass standard calibration processes. The results of this study strengthen the confidence of the technical management of the five participating laboratories and, consequently, of the national quality infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":30552,"journal":{"name":"Innotec","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparación interlaboratorio para medición de masa convencional en cinco laboratorios: aportes a la infraestructura de la calidad en Panamá y República Dominicana\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.26461/26.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes the results of a comparison between five metrology laboratories, located in Panama and the Dominican Republic, with measurements carried out from July to September 2022. The objective of the intercomparison was to evaluate the capacity of the laboratories to calibrate mass standards of class of accuracy F, in the range from 2 mg to 2 kg, as well as class M1 of 20 kg, in accordance with the provisions of the International Recommendation OIML R 111-1. Because the participants consistently had satisfactory results, it was not necessary to implement corrective actions in the participating laboratories to improve their mass standard calibration processes. The results of this study strengthen the confidence of the technical management of the five participating laboratories and, consequently, of the national quality infrastructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innotec\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innotec\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26461/26.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innotec","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26461/26.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文描述了位于巴拿马和多米尼加共和国的五个计量实验室对2022年7月至9月进行的测量进行比较的结果。相互比较的目的是根据国际建议OIML R 111-1的规定,评估实验室校准精度等级F(2毫克至2公斤)和M1(20公斤)的质量标准的能力。由于参与者始终有满意的结果,因此没有必要在参与的实验室实施纠正措施来改进其质量标准校准过程。这项研究的结果增强了五个参与实验室技术管理的信心,从而增强了国家质量基础设施的信心。
Comparación interlaboratorio para medición de masa convencional en cinco laboratorios: aportes a la infraestructura de la calidad en Panamá y República Dominicana
This article describes the results of a comparison between five metrology laboratories, located in Panama and the Dominican Republic, with measurements carried out from July to September 2022. The objective of the intercomparison was to evaluate the capacity of the laboratories to calibrate mass standards of class of accuracy F, in the range from 2 mg to 2 kg, as well as class M1 of 20 kg, in accordance with the provisions of the International Recommendation OIML R 111-1. Because the participants consistently had satisfactory results, it was not necessary to implement corrective actions in the participating laboratories to improve their mass standard calibration processes. The results of this study strengthen the confidence of the technical management of the five participating laboratories and, consequently, of the national quality infrastructure.