避免脾切除术治疗小儿脾损伤。

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica Pub Date : 1990-05-01
K Lännergren, P Tordai, T Linné, U Persson
{"title":"避免脾切除术治疗小儿脾损伤。","authors":"K Lännergren,&nbsp;P Tordai,&nbsp;T Linné,&nbsp;U Persson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ninety-two consecutive patients with traumatic rupture of the spleen were studied. Of the first 46 children (group A), 44 underwent splenectomy. In the subsequent group (group B) non-operative management was successful in 40 of 46 patients, five patients were operated with splenic repair, and one had the spleen removed. All the ruptures were caused by blunt trauma and the severity of the splenic injury was roughly the same in the two groups of patients. A third of the patients in each group had associated injuries, renal injury being the most common intraabdominal lesion. The median hospital stay was 8.0 days (range 5 to 28) in group A and 12.5 days (range 7 to 18) in group B. Among the 40 patients who were treated conservatively, a biphasic course was seen in 23: one or two days after the accident a period of increased pulse rate, fever and increased abdominal tenderness and pain followed, but no evidence for a delayed rupture was found. Our results of conservative treatment of splenic rupture are encouraging and show that non-operative management should be considered in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7005,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","volume":"156 5","pages":"359-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Avoiding splenectomy in the treatment of children with splenic injury.\",\"authors\":\"K Lännergren,&nbsp;P Tordai,&nbsp;T Linné,&nbsp;U Persson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ninety-two consecutive patients with traumatic rupture of the spleen were studied. Of the first 46 children (group A), 44 underwent splenectomy. In the subsequent group (group B) non-operative management was successful in 40 of 46 patients, five patients were operated with splenic repair, and one had the spleen removed. All the ruptures were caused by blunt trauma and the severity of the splenic injury was roughly the same in the two groups of patients. A third of the patients in each group had associated injuries, renal injury being the most common intraabdominal lesion. The median hospital stay was 8.0 days (range 5 to 28) in group A and 12.5 days (range 7 to 18) in group B. Among the 40 patients who were treated conservatively, a biphasic course was seen in 23: one or two days after the accident a period of increased pulse rate, fever and increased abdominal tenderness and pain followed, but no evidence for a delayed rupture was found. Our results of conservative treatment of splenic rupture are encouraging and show that non-operative management should be considered in most cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"156 5\",\"pages\":\"359-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对连续92例外伤性脾破裂患者进行了研究。在前46例患儿(A组)中,44例行脾切除术。后继组(B组)46例患者非手术治疗40例成功,5例行脾修复术,1例行脾切除。所有破裂均为钝性创伤所致,两组患者脾损伤的严重程度大致相同。每组三分之一的患者有相关损伤,肾损伤是最常见的腹腔内病变。A组的中位住院时间为8.0天(范围5至28天),b组为12.5天(范围7至18天)。在保守治疗的40例患者中,23例出现双相病程:事故发生后1至2天,脉搏加快,发热,腹部压痛和疼痛增加,但未发现延迟破裂的证据。我们的结果保守治疗脾破裂是令人鼓舞的,并表明非手术治疗应考虑在大多数情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Avoiding splenectomy in the treatment of children with splenic injury.

Ninety-two consecutive patients with traumatic rupture of the spleen were studied. Of the first 46 children (group A), 44 underwent splenectomy. In the subsequent group (group B) non-operative management was successful in 40 of 46 patients, five patients were operated with splenic repair, and one had the spleen removed. All the ruptures were caused by blunt trauma and the severity of the splenic injury was roughly the same in the two groups of patients. A third of the patients in each group had associated injuries, renal injury being the most common intraabdominal lesion. The median hospital stay was 8.0 days (range 5 to 28) in group A and 12.5 days (range 7 to 18) in group B. Among the 40 patients who were treated conservatively, a biphasic course was seen in 23: one or two days after the accident a period of increased pulse rate, fever and increased abdominal tenderness and pain followed, but no evidence for a delayed rupture was found. Our results of conservative treatment of splenic rupture are encouraging and show that non-operative management should be considered in most cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Atrial septal defects. Prevention of adhesions by high molecular weight dextran in rats. Re-evaluation in nine experiments. Relevant factors in the prognosis of ductal pancreatic carcinoma. A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglycolic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1