法医科学家的手艺:走向一个综合的理论。第2部分:中观和宏观方法

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418
Alexandre Giovanelli
{"title":"法医科学家的手艺:走向一个综合的理论。第2部分:中观和宏观方法","authors":"Alexandre Giovanelli","doi":"10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSeveral authors have suggested theoretical approaches that support the practices of forensic scientists, including adherence to the evidential paradigm and the centrality of the concept of trace, both included in the Sydney Declaration. The objective of this paper was to continue the construction of an integrated theoretical model, which incorporates the epistemological, methodological and practical dimensions of the forensic scientist’s work. Therefore, these new discussions found in the literature will be incorporated, as well as some established traditional concepts. A synthesis theory was elaborated from basic concepts and practices related to the following procedures performed by forensic scientists: a) use of laws derived from other sciences to assert causes associated with state changes observed in a trace; b) use of inferences and experimentation for the reconstruction of the criminal event and detection of trace arrangement patterns in criminal scenarios. The formulation of a coherent, hierarchical and systematic framework provides subsidies for facing some challenges in forensic science, such as: evaluating the role of cognitive bias in certain phases of the forensic scientist’s work; the determination of a coherent curriculum that aggregates the essential competences for forensic analysis and the improvement of the predictive potential of forensic science in intelligence studies.KEYWORDS: Forensic sciencetheory synthesisSydney Declarationepistemologylogical reasoningevidential paradigm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. In fact, Alphonse Bertillon used this aphorism to support his analyzes of identification through photography. However, in his work ‘Anthropometric Identification’ (1893), Bertillon himself attributed these words to the famous anatomist Louis Peisse (1803–1880) inserted as an epigraph by Paul Richer (1849–1933) in his ‘Traité d’Anatomie Artistique’ (1890).2. The term is a way of recognizing the pioneering work of Frances Glessner Lee (1878–1962), an American scientist who dedicated herself to forensic science, promoting scientific meetings, discussions and research. His most famous accomplishment was the reconstitution of real crime scenes, through dioramas, known as ‘Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death’.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any funding.","PeriodicalId":8613,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences","volume":"46 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The forensic´s scientist craft: toward an integrative theory. Part 2: meso- and macroapproach\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Giovanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTSeveral authors have suggested theoretical approaches that support the practices of forensic scientists, including adherence to the evidential paradigm and the centrality of the concept of trace, both included in the Sydney Declaration. The objective of this paper was to continue the construction of an integrated theoretical model, which incorporates the epistemological, methodological and practical dimensions of the forensic scientist’s work. Therefore, these new discussions found in the literature will be incorporated, as well as some established traditional concepts. A synthesis theory was elaborated from basic concepts and practices related to the following procedures performed by forensic scientists: a) use of laws derived from other sciences to assert causes associated with state changes observed in a trace; b) use of inferences and experimentation for the reconstruction of the criminal event and detection of trace arrangement patterns in criminal scenarios. The formulation of a coherent, hierarchical and systematic framework provides subsidies for facing some challenges in forensic science, such as: evaluating the role of cognitive bias in certain phases of the forensic scientist’s work; the determination of a coherent curriculum that aggregates the essential competences for forensic analysis and the improvement of the predictive potential of forensic science in intelligence studies.KEYWORDS: Forensic sciencetheory synthesisSydney Declarationepistemologylogical reasoningevidential paradigm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. In fact, Alphonse Bertillon used this aphorism to support his analyzes of identification through photography. However, in his work ‘Anthropometric Identification’ (1893), Bertillon himself attributed these words to the famous anatomist Louis Peisse (1803–1880) inserted as an epigraph by Paul Richer (1849–1933) in his ‘Traité d’Anatomie Artistique’ (1890).2. The term is a way of recognizing the pioneering work of Frances Glessner Lee (1878–1962), an American scientist who dedicated herself to forensic science, promoting scientific meetings, discussions and research. His most famous accomplishment was the reconstitution of real crime scenes, through dioramas, known as ‘Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death’.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any funding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences\",\"volume\":\"46 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几位作者提出了支持法医科学家实践的理论方法,包括坚持证据范式和痕迹概念的中心地位,这两者都包含在悉尼宣言中。本文的目的是继续构建一个综合的理论模型,该模型结合了法医科学家工作的认识论、方法论和实践维度。因此,这些在文献中发现的新的讨论将被纳入,以及一些既定的传统概念。一个综合理论从基本概念和实践相关的法医科学家执行以下程序阐述:A)利用从其他科学推导的规律,以确定在痕迹中观察到的状态变化的相关原因;B)利用推理和实验来重建犯罪事件和检测犯罪场景中的痕迹排列模式。一个连贯的、分层的和系统的框架的制定为法医学面临的一些挑战提供了补贴,例如:评估认知偏见在法医学工作的某些阶段的作用;确定一个连贯的课程,集中了法医分析的基本能力,并提高了情报研究中法医科学的预测潜力。关键词:法医学理论综合悉尼宣言认识论推理证据范式披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突事实上,阿尔方斯·贝蒂永(Alphonse Bertillon)用这句格言来支持他通过摄影对身份的分析。然而,在他的作品《人体测量鉴定》(1893)中,Bertillon自己把这些话归功于著名的解剖学家Louis Peisse(1803-1880),保罗·里切尔(1849-1933)在他的《trait d’anatomie Artistique》(1890)中插入了题词。这个词是对弗朗西斯·格莱斯纳·李(Frances Glessner Lee, 1878-1962)的开创性工作的一种认可。这位美国科学家致力于法医学,促进了科学会议、讨论和研究。他最著名的成就是通过立体模型重建真实的犯罪现场,被称为“无法解释的死亡的果壳研究”。本研究未获得任何资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The forensic´s scientist craft: toward an integrative theory. Part 2: meso- and macroapproach
ABSTRACTSeveral authors have suggested theoretical approaches that support the practices of forensic scientists, including adherence to the evidential paradigm and the centrality of the concept of trace, both included in the Sydney Declaration. The objective of this paper was to continue the construction of an integrated theoretical model, which incorporates the epistemological, methodological and practical dimensions of the forensic scientist’s work. Therefore, these new discussions found in the literature will be incorporated, as well as some established traditional concepts. A synthesis theory was elaborated from basic concepts and practices related to the following procedures performed by forensic scientists: a) use of laws derived from other sciences to assert causes associated with state changes observed in a trace; b) use of inferences and experimentation for the reconstruction of the criminal event and detection of trace arrangement patterns in criminal scenarios. The formulation of a coherent, hierarchical and systematic framework provides subsidies for facing some challenges in forensic science, such as: evaluating the role of cognitive bias in certain phases of the forensic scientist’s work; the determination of a coherent curriculum that aggregates the essential competences for forensic analysis and the improvement of the predictive potential of forensic science in intelligence studies.KEYWORDS: Forensic sciencetheory synthesisSydney Declarationepistemologylogical reasoningevidential paradigm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. In fact, Alphonse Bertillon used this aphorism to support his analyzes of identification through photography. However, in his work ‘Anthropometric Identification’ (1893), Bertillon himself attributed these words to the famous anatomist Louis Peisse (1803–1880) inserted as an epigraph by Paul Richer (1849–1933) in his ‘Traité d’Anatomie Artistique’ (1890).2. The term is a way of recognizing the pioneering work of Frances Glessner Lee (1878–1962), an American scientist who dedicated herself to forensic science, promoting scientific meetings, discussions and research. His most famous accomplishment was the reconstitution of real crime scenes, through dioramas, known as ‘Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death’.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any funding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences is the official publication of the Australian Academy of Forensic Sciences and helps the Academy meet its Objects. The Academy invites submission of review articles, research papers, commentaries, book reviews and correspondence relevant to Objects of the Academy. The Editorial policy is to attempt to represent the law, medicine and science and to promote active discussions of the relevant issues of the time as they affect the professional practice of the forensic sciences. The Journal is not restricted to contributions only from Australian authors but it will attempt to represent issues of particular relevance to Australia and its region. The meetings of the Academy normally include a plenary presentation and the Journal will seek to publish these presentations where appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Volume 56, Issue 5 Quantifying canine tissue stiffness change patterns using shear-wave elastography: implications for time of death estimation Application of discriminant function analysis and logistic regression models to estimate sex using the dimensions around the metatarsal diaphyseal nutrient foramen in the South Africans of Mixed ancestry Intracranial calcifications in Post-mortem Computed Tomography and its forensic implications Cheiloscopy in population affinity estimation: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1