{"title":"法医科学家的手艺:走向一个综合的理论。第2部分:中观和宏观方法","authors":"Alexandre Giovanelli","doi":"10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSeveral authors have suggested theoretical approaches that support the practices of forensic scientists, including adherence to the evidential paradigm and the centrality of the concept of trace, both included in the Sydney Declaration. The objective of this paper was to continue the construction of an integrated theoretical model, which incorporates the epistemological, methodological and practical dimensions of the forensic scientist’s work. Therefore, these new discussions found in the literature will be incorporated, as well as some established traditional concepts. A synthesis theory was elaborated from basic concepts and practices related to the following procedures performed by forensic scientists: a) use of laws derived from other sciences to assert causes associated with state changes observed in a trace; b) use of inferences and experimentation for the reconstruction of the criminal event and detection of trace arrangement patterns in criminal scenarios. The formulation of a coherent, hierarchical and systematic framework provides subsidies for facing some challenges in forensic science, such as: evaluating the role of cognitive bias in certain phases of the forensic scientist’s work; the determination of a coherent curriculum that aggregates the essential competences for forensic analysis and the improvement of the predictive potential of forensic science in intelligence studies.KEYWORDS: Forensic sciencetheory synthesisSydney Declarationepistemologylogical reasoningevidential paradigm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. In fact, Alphonse Bertillon used this aphorism to support his analyzes of identification through photography. However, in his work ‘Anthropometric Identification’ (1893), Bertillon himself attributed these words to the famous anatomist Louis Peisse (1803–1880) inserted as an epigraph by Paul Richer (1849–1933) in his ‘Traité d’Anatomie Artistique’ (1890).2. The term is a way of recognizing the pioneering work of Frances Glessner Lee (1878–1962), an American scientist who dedicated herself to forensic science, promoting scientific meetings, discussions and research. His most famous accomplishment was the reconstitution of real crime scenes, through dioramas, known as ‘Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death’.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any funding.","PeriodicalId":8613,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences","volume":"46 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The forensic´s scientist craft: toward an integrative theory. Part 2: meso- and macroapproach\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Giovanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTSeveral authors have suggested theoretical approaches that support the practices of forensic scientists, including adherence to the evidential paradigm and the centrality of the concept of trace, both included in the Sydney Declaration. The objective of this paper was to continue the construction of an integrated theoretical model, which incorporates the epistemological, methodological and practical dimensions of the forensic scientist’s work. Therefore, these new discussions found in the literature will be incorporated, as well as some established traditional concepts. A synthesis theory was elaborated from basic concepts and practices related to the following procedures performed by forensic scientists: a) use of laws derived from other sciences to assert causes associated with state changes observed in a trace; b) use of inferences and experimentation for the reconstruction of the criminal event and detection of trace arrangement patterns in criminal scenarios. The formulation of a coherent, hierarchical and systematic framework provides subsidies for facing some challenges in forensic science, such as: evaluating the role of cognitive bias in certain phases of the forensic scientist’s work; the determination of a coherent curriculum that aggregates the essential competences for forensic analysis and the improvement of the predictive potential of forensic science in intelligence studies.KEYWORDS: Forensic sciencetheory synthesisSydney Declarationepistemologylogical reasoningevidential paradigm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. In fact, Alphonse Bertillon used this aphorism to support his analyzes of identification through photography. However, in his work ‘Anthropometric Identification’ (1893), Bertillon himself attributed these words to the famous anatomist Louis Peisse (1803–1880) inserted as an epigraph by Paul Richer (1849–1933) in his ‘Traité d’Anatomie Artistique’ (1890).2. The term is a way of recognizing the pioneering work of Frances Glessner Lee (1878–1962), an American scientist who dedicated herself to forensic science, promoting scientific meetings, discussions and research. His most famous accomplishment was the reconstitution of real crime scenes, through dioramas, known as ‘Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death’.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any funding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences\",\"volume\":\"46 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The forensic´s scientist craft: toward an integrative theory. Part 2: meso- and macroapproach
ABSTRACTSeveral authors have suggested theoretical approaches that support the practices of forensic scientists, including adherence to the evidential paradigm and the centrality of the concept of trace, both included in the Sydney Declaration. The objective of this paper was to continue the construction of an integrated theoretical model, which incorporates the epistemological, methodological and practical dimensions of the forensic scientist’s work. Therefore, these new discussions found in the literature will be incorporated, as well as some established traditional concepts. A synthesis theory was elaborated from basic concepts and practices related to the following procedures performed by forensic scientists: a) use of laws derived from other sciences to assert causes associated with state changes observed in a trace; b) use of inferences and experimentation for the reconstruction of the criminal event and detection of trace arrangement patterns in criminal scenarios. The formulation of a coherent, hierarchical and systematic framework provides subsidies for facing some challenges in forensic science, such as: evaluating the role of cognitive bias in certain phases of the forensic scientist’s work; the determination of a coherent curriculum that aggregates the essential competences for forensic analysis and the improvement of the predictive potential of forensic science in intelligence studies.KEYWORDS: Forensic sciencetheory synthesisSydney Declarationepistemologylogical reasoningevidential paradigm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. In fact, Alphonse Bertillon used this aphorism to support his analyzes of identification through photography. However, in his work ‘Anthropometric Identification’ (1893), Bertillon himself attributed these words to the famous anatomist Louis Peisse (1803–1880) inserted as an epigraph by Paul Richer (1849–1933) in his ‘Traité d’Anatomie Artistique’ (1890).2. The term is a way of recognizing the pioneering work of Frances Glessner Lee (1878–1962), an American scientist who dedicated herself to forensic science, promoting scientific meetings, discussions and research. His most famous accomplishment was the reconstitution of real crime scenes, through dioramas, known as ‘Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death’.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any funding.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences is the official publication of the Australian Academy of Forensic Sciences and helps the Academy meet its Objects.
The Academy invites submission of review articles, research papers, commentaries, book reviews and correspondence relevant to Objects of the Academy. The Editorial policy is to attempt to represent the law, medicine and science and to promote active discussions of the relevant issues of the time as they affect the professional practice of the forensic sciences. The Journal is not restricted to contributions only from Australian authors but it will attempt to represent issues of particular relevance to Australia and its region.
The meetings of the Academy normally include a plenary presentation and the Journal will seek to publish these presentations where appropriate.