{"title":"回顾:眼睛看到:拉斯维加斯之后的建筑","authors":"Christophe Van Gerrewey","doi":"10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Book Review| September 01 2023 Review: Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas Stanislaus von Moos and Martino Stierli, eds. Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas Zurich: Scheidegger & Spiess, 2020, 256 pp., 125 color and 50 b/w illus. $49 (paper), ISBN 9783858818201 Christophe Van Gerrewey Christophe Van Gerrewey École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2023) 82 (3): 350–351. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Christophe Van Gerrewey; Review: Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 September 2023; 82 (3): 350–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search “Las Vegas is not the subject of our book,” Denise Scott Brown declared in the preface to the 1977 second edition of Learning from Las Vegas, originally published in 1972 and cowritten with Robert Venturi and Steven Izenour.1 What that subject might be is something that critics, historians, and architects have been trying to figure out for the last half century. Why should architects and students focus on popular and commercial developments in a place such as Las Vegas? Is it a problem if they suspend critical, aesthetic, or moral judgment? And how can such a study nourish contemporary architecture—with what effect—and for whom? These are also questions whose meaning and relevance for architecture have changed over time. Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas is one of several recent books that examine the significance and the legacy of Learning from Las Vegas. It collects about twenty... You do not currently have access to this content.","PeriodicalId":45734,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review: <i>Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas</i>\",\"authors\":\"Christophe Van Gerrewey\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Book Review| September 01 2023 Review: Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas Stanislaus von Moos and Martino Stierli, eds. Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas Zurich: Scheidegger & Spiess, 2020, 256 pp., 125 color and 50 b/w illus. $49 (paper), ISBN 9783858818201 Christophe Van Gerrewey Christophe Van Gerrewey École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2023) 82 (3): 350–351. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Christophe Van Gerrewey; Review: Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 September 2023; 82 (3): 350–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search “Las Vegas is not the subject of our book,” Denise Scott Brown declared in the preface to the 1977 second edition of Learning from Las Vegas, originally published in 1972 and cowritten with Robert Venturi and Steven Izenour.1 What that subject might be is something that critics, historians, and architects have been trying to figure out for the last half century. Why should architects and students focus on popular and commercial developments in a place such as Las Vegas? Is it a problem if they suspend critical, aesthetic, or moral judgment? And how can such a study nourish contemporary architecture—with what effect—and for whom? These are also questions whose meaning and relevance for architecture have changed over time. Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas is one of several recent books that examine the significance and the legacy of Learning from Las Vegas. It collects about twenty... You do not currently have access to this content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
书评:《看到的眼睛:拉斯维加斯之后的建筑》斯坦尼斯劳斯·冯·莫斯和马蒂诺·斯蒂利主编。苏黎世:Scheidegger & Spiess, 2020, 256页,125色,50张/w。49美元(论文),ISBN 9783858818201 Christophe Van Gerrewey Christophe Van Gerrewey École Polytechnique fsamdsamusanne搜索作者的其他作品:此网站PubMed Google Scholar Journal of Architectural Historians(2023) 82(3): 350-351。https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350查看图标查看文章内容图表和表格视频音频补充数据同行评审分享图标分享Facebook Twitter LinkedIn电子邮件工具图标工具获得许可引用图标引用搜索网站引用Christophe Van Gerrewey;回顾:眼睛看到:拉斯维加斯之后的建筑。《建筑历史学会学报》2023年9月1日;82(3): 350-351。doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350下载引文文件:Ris (Zotero)参考管理EasyBib Bookends Mendeley论文EndNote RefWorks BibTex工具栏搜索搜索下拉菜单工具栏搜索搜索输入搜索输入自动建议过滤您的搜索所有内容建筑历史学家协会期刊搜索“拉斯维加斯不是我们书的主题”丹尼斯·斯科特·布朗在《向拉斯维加斯学习》1977年第二版的序言中宣称,这本书最初出版于1972年,是与罗伯特·文丘里和史蒂文·伊泽诺尔合著的。“在过去的半个世纪里,评论家、历史学家和建筑师一直在试图弄清楚这个主题是什么。”为什么建筑师和学生要关注拉斯维加斯这样的地方的流行和商业发展?如果他们暂停批判、审美或道德判断,这是个问题吗?这样的研究如何滋养当代建筑——有什么效果——为谁?随着时间的推移,这些问题对建筑的意义和相关性也发生了变化。《眼看:拉斯维加斯之后的建筑》是最近几本书中的一本,探讨了向拉斯维加斯学习的意义和遗产。它收集了大约20个……您目前没有访问此内容的权限。
Review: Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas
Book Review| September 01 2023 Review: Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas Stanislaus von Moos and Martino Stierli, eds. Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas Zurich: Scheidegger & Spiess, 2020, 256 pp., 125 color and 50 b/w illus. $49 (paper), ISBN 9783858818201 Christophe Van Gerrewey Christophe Van Gerrewey École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2023) 82 (3): 350–351. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Christophe Van Gerrewey; Review: Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 September 2023; 82 (3): 350–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.3.350 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search “Las Vegas is not the subject of our book,” Denise Scott Brown declared in the preface to the 1977 second edition of Learning from Las Vegas, originally published in 1972 and cowritten with Robert Venturi and Steven Izenour.1 What that subject might be is something that critics, historians, and architects have been trying to figure out for the last half century. Why should architects and students focus on popular and commercial developments in a place such as Las Vegas? Is it a problem if they suspend critical, aesthetic, or moral judgment? And how can such a study nourish contemporary architecture—with what effect—and for whom? These are also questions whose meaning and relevance for architecture have changed over time. Eyes That Saw: Architecture after Las Vegas is one of several recent books that examine the significance and the legacy of Learning from Las Vegas. It collects about twenty... You do not currently have access to this content.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1941, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians is a leading English-language journal on the history of the built environment. Each issue offers four to five scholarly articles on topics from all periods of history and all parts of the world, reviews of recent books, exhibitions, films, and other media, as well as a variety of editorials and opinion pieces designed to place the discipline of architectural history within a larger intellectual context.