革命两党制的实践:布尔什维克和左派社会革命党在莫斯科和莫斯科地区当局的联合

I. A. Kontsevoy
{"title":"革命两党制的实践:布尔什维克和左派社会革命党在莫斯科和莫斯科地区当局的联合","authors":"I. A. Kontsevoy","doi":"10.17072/2219-3111-2023-3-85-96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the problem of interaction between the representatives of the Bolsheviks and the Left Socialist Revolutionaries in the institutions of Soviet power in Moscow and the Moscow region in the first half of 1918. The author introduces new archival documents into scientific circulation, which serve as an important source for studying the conflicts between the Bolsheviks and the Left SRs in Moscow government institutions. Using specific examples of ideological and administrative clashes, the author studies the practices of interaction between the Bolsheviks and the Left SRs within the framework of a dual-party coalition. The author proves that the interaction of representatives of the two parties in the Moscow authorities included both conflicts between the Bolshevik and the Left socialist revolutionary commissars, and joint state work, which consisted of organizing the management of the territory of Moscow and the Moscow region. Archival documents show that among the Bolsheviks there was no single point of view on the need for the existence of separate Moscow authorities. Representatives of the left communists, as well as the Left socialist revolutionaries, advocated the preservation of independent state institutions in the Moscow region, which created the possibility of an alliance between them and the Left Socialist Revolutionaries. However, the active actions of Vladimir Lenin prevented a split among the Moscow Bolsheviks. The emergence of a dual-party system in Soviet state institutions was a unique phenomenon in modern history of Russia, since representatives of the neo-populist socialist party could influence managerial decision-making. This situation led to the “power sharing” between the Bolsheviks and the Left SRs, which became a characteristic feature of the “long” revolution of 1917.","PeriodicalId":41257,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRACTICES OF THE REVOLUTIONARY DUAL-PARTY SYSTEM: COALITION OF BOLSHEVIKS AND LEFT SRS IN THE AUTHORITIES OF MOSCOW AND MOSCOW REGION\",\"authors\":\"I. A. Kontsevoy\",\"doi\":\"10.17072/2219-3111-2023-3-85-96\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the problem of interaction between the representatives of the Bolsheviks and the Left Socialist Revolutionaries in the institutions of Soviet power in Moscow and the Moscow region in the first half of 1918. The author introduces new archival documents into scientific circulation, which serve as an important source for studying the conflicts between the Bolsheviks and the Left SRs in Moscow government institutions. Using specific examples of ideological and administrative clashes, the author studies the practices of interaction between the Bolsheviks and the Left SRs within the framework of a dual-party coalition. The author proves that the interaction of representatives of the two parties in the Moscow authorities included both conflicts between the Bolshevik and the Left socialist revolutionary commissars, and joint state work, which consisted of organizing the management of the territory of Moscow and the Moscow region. Archival documents show that among the Bolsheviks there was no single point of view on the need for the existence of separate Moscow authorities. Representatives of the left communists, as well as the Left socialist revolutionaries, advocated the preservation of independent state institutions in the Moscow region, which created the possibility of an alliance between them and the Left Socialist Revolutionaries. However, the active actions of Vladimir Lenin prevented a split among the Moscow Bolsheviks. The emergence of a dual-party system in Soviet state institutions was a unique phenomenon in modern history of Russia, since representatives of the neo-populist socialist party could influence managerial decision-making. This situation led to the “power sharing” between the Bolsheviks and the Left SRs, which became a characteristic feature of the “long” revolution of 1917.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-3-85-96\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-3-85-96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了1918年上半年莫斯科和莫斯科地区苏维埃政权机构中布尔什维克代表和左派社会革命党人代表之间的互动问题。作者在科学流通中引入了新的档案文件,这些文件是研究莫斯科政府机构中布尔什维克与左派社会革命党之间冲突的重要资料来源。作者利用意识形态和行政冲突的具体例子,研究了布尔什维克和左翼社会革命党在两党联盟框架内的互动实践。作者证明,两党代表在莫斯科当局的相互作用既包括布尔什维克和左派社会主义革命委员之间的冲突,也包括共同的国家工作,包括组织管理莫斯科和莫斯科地区的领土。档案文件显示,在布尔什维克内部,没有人认为莫斯科当局需要单独存在。左派共产党人和左派社会革命党人的代表主张在莫斯科地区保留独立的国家机构,这为他们和左派社会革命党人之间的联盟创造了可能性。然而,弗拉基米尔·列宁的积极行动阻止了莫斯科布尔什维克内部的分裂苏联国家机构中出现两党制是俄罗斯现代史上的独特现象,因为新民粹主义社会主义政党的代表可以影响管理决策。这种情况导致了布尔什维克和左翼社会革命党之间的“权力分享”,这成为1917年“长期”革命的一个特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PRACTICES OF THE REVOLUTIONARY DUAL-PARTY SYSTEM: COALITION OF BOLSHEVIKS AND LEFT SRS IN THE AUTHORITIES OF MOSCOW AND MOSCOW REGION
The article examines the problem of interaction between the representatives of the Bolsheviks and the Left Socialist Revolutionaries in the institutions of Soviet power in Moscow and the Moscow region in the first half of 1918. The author introduces new archival documents into scientific circulation, which serve as an important source for studying the conflicts between the Bolsheviks and the Left SRs in Moscow government institutions. Using specific examples of ideological and administrative clashes, the author studies the practices of interaction between the Bolsheviks and the Left SRs within the framework of a dual-party coalition. The author proves that the interaction of representatives of the two parties in the Moscow authorities included both conflicts between the Bolshevik and the Left socialist revolutionary commissars, and joint state work, which consisted of organizing the management of the territory of Moscow and the Moscow region. Archival documents show that among the Bolsheviks there was no single point of view on the need for the existence of separate Moscow authorities. Representatives of the left communists, as well as the Left socialist revolutionaries, advocated the preservation of independent state institutions in the Moscow region, which created the possibility of an alliance between them and the Left Socialist Revolutionaries. However, the active actions of Vladimir Lenin prevented a split among the Moscow Bolsheviks. The emergence of a dual-party system in Soviet state institutions was a unique phenomenon in modern history of Russia, since representatives of the neo-populist socialist party could influence managerial decision-making. This situation led to the “power sharing” between the Bolsheviks and the Left SRs, which became a characteristic feature of the “long” revolution of 1917.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
«СОЦИАЛДЫК ПАТОЛОГИЯ» ТҮШҮНҮГҮНҮН ЖАНА ФОРМАЛАРЫНЫН ИЗИЛДЕНИШИ ААЛАМДАШУУ ШАРТЫНДА КЫРГЫЗСТАНДЫКТАРДЫН ЖАРАНДЫК ИДЕНТТҮҮЛҮГҮ: УЧУРДАГЫ АБАЛЫ ЖАНА БАГЫТТАРЫ КЫРГЫЗСТАНДАГЫ ОРУС ЧИРКӨӨСҮНҮН ТАРЫХЫ ЖАНА БҮГҮНКҮ КҮНДӨГҮ АБАЛЫ (АКСЫ РАЙОНУНУН ЖЕРГЕ-ТАЛ АЙЫЛЫНЫН МИСАЛЫНДА) ОТРАЖЕНИЕ ИСТОРИИ ХЛОПКОВОДСТВА В АРХИВАХ ТОРГОВЫХ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЙ ТУРКЕСТАНСКОГО КРАЯ (НА ПРИМЕРЕ КОЛОНИАЛЬНОГО ПЕРИОДА) ЭГЕМЕНДҮҮЛҮК ЖЫЛДАРЫНДА КЫРГЫЗСТАНДЫН «ЛЕГЕНДАРЛУУ» ПАРЛАМЕНТИНИН – ЖОГОРКУ КЕҢЕШИНИН КАЛЫПТАНЫШЫ ЖАНА АНЫН МАМЛЕКЕТТИК-УКУКТУК РОЛУ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1