纪念碑实验室:Paul M. Farber和Ken Lum主编的《费城的创造性推测》和David W. Young著的《日耳曼战役:美国有效的公共历史》(评论)

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q4 HISTORY PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/pmh.2023.a909546
{"title":"纪念碑实验室:Paul M. Farber和Ken Lum主编的《费城的创造性推测》和David W. Young著的《日耳曼战役:美国有效的公共历史》(评论)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/pmh.2023.a909546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Monument Lab:Creative Speculations for Philadelphia ed. by Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum, and: The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America by David W. Young Abby R. Eron Monument Lab: Creative Speculations for Philadelphia. Edited by Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum (Philadelphia : Temple University Press, 2020. 336 pp. Illustrations. Cloth, $35.) The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America. By David W. Young. (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2019. 294 pp. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. Paper, $29.95; cloth, $109.50; ebook, $29.95.) Contemporary artist Karyn Olivier stepped into one of public history's particularly contentious arenas with her The Battle is Joined (2017), one of twenty Monument Lab commissions documented in the present exhibition catalog. Spread across Philadelphia's public spaces, this nontraditional exhibition revolved around the question, \"What is an appropriate monument for the current city of Philadelphia?\" In response, Olivier used acrylic mirrors to encase a 1903 memorial to the Battle of Germantown in Vernon Park, located in the Germantown section of Philadelphia. Her visually and conceptually intriguing intervention, though only temporary, disturbed some, as the installation's reflective surface seemed to disappear the hundred-plus-year-old memorial it enclosed. Americans lost the 1777 Battle of Germantown, but it provided momentum for eventual victory in the Revolutionary War. In The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America, which features an image of Olivier's work on its book cover, David W. Young diagnoses Germantown's public history apparatus with an overly narrow focus on this battle and on white colonial history, to the exclusion of more chronologically, racially, and otherwise diverse narratives. Young writes as former executive director of two of Germantown's historic house museums. His book examines, through a series of \"battles,\" the successes and failures of over a century of public history. He offers Germantown as a case study, arguing that the neighborhood has begun to practice \"effective public history,\" that which fosters dialogue and addresses contemporary problems while confronting and amending the historical record's gaps and biases. [End Page 69] Chapter one looks at how Cliveden house and the Historic Germantown consortium revised their interpretative approaches in the first decades of the twenty-first century to reflect Germantown's majority African American population more meaningfully and truthfully. Chapter two considers the Negro Achievement Week celebration in Germantown in 1928. This event was significant as a predecessor to Black History Month, as an expression of Harlem Renaissance artistry and philosophy, and as \"the first modern public history program in America\" (38). Young analyzes why it was forgotten and discusses how it has since been remembered. Chapter three looks at a failed attempt to enact a Colonial Williamsburg–style development project in Germantown in the 1950s and '60s. Chapter four recounts the process through which Johnson House gained recognition as a station on the Underground Railroad. The success of the site as a waystation toward freedom depended on its secrecy, a semi-invisibility that presented challenges for historians. Chapter five looks at how Germantown has addressed \"empty\" spaces, including a dilapidated town hall, an out-of-business house museum, the Cliveden kitchen, and an abandoned housing project that had been built atop a potter's field (public burial ground). With the latter, one wishes to know more about the local availability of affordable housing, and the possible tensions between, or coalescing of, justice in remembrance and justice in housing. In general, though, Young does not shy away from the realities of his work. Through his commitment to archival research and to his constituents, Young sets an encouraging example for public history's practitioners. Monument Lab: Creative Speculations for Philadelphia presents an excellent record of a unique art exhibition. Professors Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum, the book's editors, led the project. They and the head of Mural Arts Philadelphia, their partner in the exhibition, contribute essays to part one of the volume. They critique the city's current collection of monuments for what and whom they exclude. The bulk of the catalog, part two, consists of entries for twenty monument commissions, called \"prototypes,\" followed by a reflection...","PeriodicalId":43963,"journal":{"name":"PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monument Lab:Creative Speculations for Philadelphia ed. by Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum, and: The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America by David W. Young (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pmh.2023.a909546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Monument Lab:Creative Speculations for Philadelphia ed. by Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum, and: The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America by David W. Young Abby R. Eron Monument Lab: Creative Speculations for Philadelphia. Edited by Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum (Philadelphia : Temple University Press, 2020. 336 pp. Illustrations. Cloth, $35.) The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America. By David W. Young. (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2019. 294 pp. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. Paper, $29.95; cloth, $109.50; ebook, $29.95.) Contemporary artist Karyn Olivier stepped into one of public history's particularly contentious arenas with her The Battle is Joined (2017), one of twenty Monument Lab commissions documented in the present exhibition catalog. Spread across Philadelphia's public spaces, this nontraditional exhibition revolved around the question, \\\"What is an appropriate monument for the current city of Philadelphia?\\\" In response, Olivier used acrylic mirrors to encase a 1903 memorial to the Battle of Germantown in Vernon Park, located in the Germantown section of Philadelphia. Her visually and conceptually intriguing intervention, though only temporary, disturbed some, as the installation's reflective surface seemed to disappear the hundred-plus-year-old memorial it enclosed. Americans lost the 1777 Battle of Germantown, but it provided momentum for eventual victory in the Revolutionary War. In The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America, which features an image of Olivier's work on its book cover, David W. Young diagnoses Germantown's public history apparatus with an overly narrow focus on this battle and on white colonial history, to the exclusion of more chronologically, racially, and otherwise diverse narratives. Young writes as former executive director of two of Germantown's historic house museums. His book examines, through a series of \\\"battles,\\\" the successes and failures of over a century of public history. He offers Germantown as a case study, arguing that the neighborhood has begun to practice \\\"effective public history,\\\" that which fosters dialogue and addresses contemporary problems while confronting and amending the historical record's gaps and biases. [End Page 69] Chapter one looks at how Cliveden house and the Historic Germantown consortium revised their interpretative approaches in the first decades of the twenty-first century to reflect Germantown's majority African American population more meaningfully and truthfully. Chapter two considers the Negro Achievement Week celebration in Germantown in 1928. This event was significant as a predecessor to Black History Month, as an expression of Harlem Renaissance artistry and philosophy, and as \\\"the first modern public history program in America\\\" (38). Young analyzes why it was forgotten and discusses how it has since been remembered. Chapter three looks at a failed attempt to enact a Colonial Williamsburg–style development project in Germantown in the 1950s and '60s. Chapter four recounts the process through which Johnson House gained recognition as a station on the Underground Railroad. The success of the site as a waystation toward freedom depended on its secrecy, a semi-invisibility that presented challenges for historians. Chapter five looks at how Germantown has addressed \\\"empty\\\" spaces, including a dilapidated town hall, an out-of-business house museum, the Cliveden kitchen, and an abandoned housing project that had been built atop a potter's field (public burial ground). With the latter, one wishes to know more about the local availability of affordable housing, and the possible tensions between, or coalescing of, justice in remembrance and justice in housing. In general, though, Young does not shy away from the realities of his work. Through his commitment to archival research and to his constituents, Young sets an encouraging example for public history's practitioners. Monument Lab: Creative Speculations for Philadelphia presents an excellent record of a unique art exhibition. Professors Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum, the book's editors, led the project. They and the head of Mural Arts Philadelphia, their partner in the exhibition, contribute essays to part one of the volume. They critique the city's current collection of monuments for what and whom they exclude. The bulk of the catalog, part two, consists of entries for twenty monument commissions, called \\\"prototypes,\\\" followed by a reflection...\",\"PeriodicalId\":43963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pmh.2023.a909546\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pmh.2023.a909546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由:纪念碑实验室:创造性的推测费城由保罗M.法伯和肯Lum编辑,和:日耳曼战役:有效的公共历史在美国由大卫W.杨艾比R. Eron纪念碑实验室:创造性的推测费城。Paul M. Farber和Ken Lum编辑(费城:天普大学出版社,2020年)。336页插图。布,35美元)。日耳曼战役:美国有效的公共历史。大卫·w·杨著。(费城:天普大学出版社,2019)294页。插图、地图、注释、参考书目、索引。纸,29.95美元;布,109.50美元;电子书,29.95美元)。当代艺术家Karyn Olivier带着她的作品The Battle is Joined(2017)步入了公共历史上特别有争议的舞台之一,这是本展览目录中记录的20个纪念碑实验室委托之一。这个非传统的展览遍布费城的公共空间,围绕着这样一个问题:“对于现在的费城来说,什么是合适的纪念碑?”作为回应,Olivier用丙烯酸镜子包裹了一座1903年日耳曼战役的纪念碑,该纪念碑位于费城的日耳曼城部分的弗农公园。她在视觉上和概念上的介入虽然只是暂时的,但却扰乱了一些人,因为装置的反射表面似乎消失了它所包含的一百多年历史的纪念。美国人输掉了1777年的日耳曼敦战役,但它为独立战争的最终胜利提供了动力。在《日耳曼战役:美国有效的公共历史》一书中,大卫·w·杨(David W. Young)在书的封面上展示了奥利维尔的作品,他认为日耳曼的公共历史机构过于狭隘地关注这场战役和白人殖民历史,而排除了更多按时间顺序、种族和其他不同的叙述。杨曾担任日耳曼敦两家历史建筑博物馆的执行董事。他的书通过一系列的“战斗”考察了一个多世纪以来公共历史的成功与失败。他以日耳曼镇为例,认为该社区已经开始实践“有效的公共历史”,即在面对和修正历史记录的差距和偏见的同时,促进对话,解决当代问题。第一章着眼于Cliveden house和Historic Germantown财团如何在21世纪的头几十年修改他们的解释方法,以更有意义和真实地反映日耳曼镇的大多数非裔美国人。第二章是1928年日耳曼镇黑人成就周的庆祝活动。这个活动作为黑人历史月的前身,作为哈莱姆文艺复兴艺术和哲学的表达,以及作为“美国第一个现代公共历史项目”,意义重大(38)。杨分析了它被遗忘的原因,并讨论了它是如何被记住的。第三章考察了20世纪五六十年代在日耳曼敦实施威廉斯堡式殖民开发项目的失败尝试。第四章叙述了约翰逊大厦作为地下铁路车站获得认可的过程。作为通往自由的中转站,这个地方的成功取决于它的保密性,这种半隐蔽性给历史学家带来了挑战。第五章着眼于日耳曼城如何解决“空”空间,包括破败的市政厅、停业的房屋博物馆、克莱夫登厨房和一个废弃的住房项目,该项目建在一个陶工的田野(公共墓地)上。对于后者,人们希望更多地了解当地可负担住房的可用性,以及记忆正义和住房正义之间可能存在的紧张关系或融合。不过,总的来说,杨并不回避他工作中的现实。通过他对档案研究和他的选民的承诺,杨为公共历史的实践者树立了一个鼓舞人心的榜样。纪念碑实验室:创造性的猜测费城提出了一个独特的艺术展览的优秀记录。该书的编辑保罗·m·法伯(Paul M. Farber)和肯·林(Ken Lum)教授领导了这个项目。他们和费城壁画艺术的负责人,他们在展览中的合作伙伴,为该卷的第一部分贡献了文章。他们批评这座城市目前的纪念碑收藏,因为他们排除了哪些人和哪些人。目录的大部分,即第二部分,包括20个纪念碑委员会的作品,称为“原型”,然后是反思……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monument Lab:Creative Speculations for Philadelphia ed. by Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum, and: The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America by David W. Young (review)
Reviewed by: Monument Lab:Creative Speculations for Philadelphia ed. by Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum, and: The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America by David W. Young Abby R. Eron Monument Lab: Creative Speculations for Philadelphia. Edited by Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum (Philadelphia : Temple University Press, 2020. 336 pp. Illustrations. Cloth, $35.) The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America. By David W. Young. (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2019. 294 pp. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. Paper, $29.95; cloth, $109.50; ebook, $29.95.) Contemporary artist Karyn Olivier stepped into one of public history's particularly contentious arenas with her The Battle is Joined (2017), one of twenty Monument Lab commissions documented in the present exhibition catalog. Spread across Philadelphia's public spaces, this nontraditional exhibition revolved around the question, "What is an appropriate monument for the current city of Philadelphia?" In response, Olivier used acrylic mirrors to encase a 1903 memorial to the Battle of Germantown in Vernon Park, located in the Germantown section of Philadelphia. Her visually and conceptually intriguing intervention, though only temporary, disturbed some, as the installation's reflective surface seemed to disappear the hundred-plus-year-old memorial it enclosed. Americans lost the 1777 Battle of Germantown, but it provided momentum for eventual victory in the Revolutionary War. In The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America, which features an image of Olivier's work on its book cover, David W. Young diagnoses Germantown's public history apparatus with an overly narrow focus on this battle and on white colonial history, to the exclusion of more chronologically, racially, and otherwise diverse narratives. Young writes as former executive director of two of Germantown's historic house museums. His book examines, through a series of "battles," the successes and failures of over a century of public history. He offers Germantown as a case study, arguing that the neighborhood has begun to practice "effective public history," that which fosters dialogue and addresses contemporary problems while confronting and amending the historical record's gaps and biases. [End Page 69] Chapter one looks at how Cliveden house and the Historic Germantown consortium revised their interpretative approaches in the first decades of the twenty-first century to reflect Germantown's majority African American population more meaningfully and truthfully. Chapter two considers the Negro Achievement Week celebration in Germantown in 1928. This event was significant as a predecessor to Black History Month, as an expression of Harlem Renaissance artistry and philosophy, and as "the first modern public history program in America" (38). Young analyzes why it was forgotten and discusses how it has since been remembered. Chapter three looks at a failed attempt to enact a Colonial Williamsburg–style development project in Germantown in the 1950s and '60s. Chapter four recounts the process through which Johnson House gained recognition as a station on the Underground Railroad. The success of the site as a waystation toward freedom depended on its secrecy, a semi-invisibility that presented challenges for historians. Chapter five looks at how Germantown has addressed "empty" spaces, including a dilapidated town hall, an out-of-business house museum, the Cliveden kitchen, and an abandoned housing project that had been built atop a potter's field (public burial ground). With the latter, one wishes to know more about the local availability of affordable housing, and the possible tensions between, or coalescing of, justice in remembrance and justice in housing. In general, though, Young does not shy away from the realities of his work. Through his commitment to archival research and to his constituents, Young sets an encouraging example for public history's practitioners. Monument Lab: Creative Speculations for Philadelphia presents an excellent record of a unique art exhibition. Professors Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum, the book's editors, led the project. They and the head of Mural Arts Philadelphia, their partner in the exhibition, contribute essays to part one of the volume. They critique the city's current collection of monuments for what and whom they exclude. The bulk of the catalog, part two, consists of entries for twenty monument commissions, called "prototypes," followed by a reflection...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
"Arnold the Traitor": George Lippard, the Mexican-American War, and the Search for an Antebellum George Washington, 1846–1852 The Trials of the American Snow George in the British Atlantic, 1805–6 Contributors Arlen Specter: Scandals, Conspiracies, and Crisis in Focus by Evan Edward Laine, and: Philadelphia Battlefields: Disruptive Campaigns and Upset Elections in a Changing City by John Kromer (review) Monument Lab:Creative Speculations for Philadelphia ed. by Paul M. Farber and Ken Lum, and: The Battles of Germantown: Effective Public History in America by David W. Young (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1