国家援助法对不对称税收的类似适用

Q3 Social Sciences European State Aid Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21552/estal/2023/3/5
L. Mörmel
{"title":"国家援助法对不对称税收的类似适用","authors":"L. Mörmel","doi":"10.21552/estal/2023/3/5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Narrow-scoped special charges imposed by Member States on certain undertakings can have an effect that is as distorting on competition as tax exemptions. However, the wording of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) does not allow for a direct application of State aid rules in these cases; neither is it possible to treat special charges as a form of far-reaching tax exemption for unaffected undertakings. Despite its practical significance, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has failed so far to address the issue appropriately. This article critically examines the relevant case-law and calls for a methodological re-orientation. In the absence of other legal instruments to deal with the problem and in light of the potential for Member States to circumvent State aid rules through special charges, Article 107(1) TFEU should, in extension of its literal scope of application, be applied to special charges by way of analogy. This would lead to more legal clarity and certainty for both lawmakers and affected undertakings. Keywords: special charges; asymmetrical taxes; negative State aid; analogous application","PeriodicalId":36612,"journal":{"name":"European State Aid Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Analogous Application of State Aid Law to Asymmetric Taxes\",\"authors\":\"L. Mörmel\",\"doi\":\"10.21552/estal/2023/3/5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Narrow-scoped special charges imposed by Member States on certain undertakings can have an effect that is as distorting on competition as tax exemptions. However, the wording of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) does not allow for a direct application of State aid rules in these cases; neither is it possible to treat special charges as a form of far-reaching tax exemption for unaffected undertakings. Despite its practical significance, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has failed so far to address the issue appropriately. This article critically examines the relevant case-law and calls for a methodological re-orientation. In the absence of other legal instruments to deal with the problem and in light of the potential for Member States to circumvent State aid rules through special charges, Article 107(1) TFEU should, in extension of its literal scope of application, be applied to special charges by way of analogy. This would lead to more legal clarity and certainty for both lawmakers and affected undertakings. Keywords: special charges; asymmetrical taxes; negative State aid; analogous application\",\"PeriodicalId\":36612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European State Aid Law Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European State Aid Law Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2023/3/5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European State Aid Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2023/3/5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

会员国对某些企业征收的范围狭窄的特别费用可能产生与免税一样扭曲竞争的影响。但是,《欧洲联盟运作条约》第107(1)条的措词不允许在这些情况下直接适用国家援助规则;也不可能将特别收费视为对未受影响的企业的一种影响深远的免税形式。尽管具有实际意义,但欧洲联盟法院(CJEU)迄今未能妥善处理这一问题。本文批判性地考察了相关的判例法,并呼吁方法论的重新定位。由于没有其他法律文书来处理这个问题,并且鉴于会员国有可能通过特别收费来规避国家援助规则,在扩大其字面适用范围时,应以类比的方式将特别收费适用于特别收费。这将为立法者和受影响的企业带来更多的法律清晰度和确定性。关键词:专项收费;不对称的税收;消极的国家援助;类似的应用程序
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Analogous Application of State Aid Law to Asymmetric Taxes
Narrow-scoped special charges imposed by Member States on certain undertakings can have an effect that is as distorting on competition as tax exemptions. However, the wording of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) does not allow for a direct application of State aid rules in these cases; neither is it possible to treat special charges as a form of far-reaching tax exemption for unaffected undertakings. Despite its practical significance, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has failed so far to address the issue appropriately. This article critically examines the relevant case-law and calls for a methodological re-orientation. In the absence of other legal instruments to deal with the problem and in light of the potential for Member States to circumvent State aid rules through special charges, Article 107(1) TFEU should, in extension of its literal scope of application, be applied to special charges by way of analogy. This would lead to more legal clarity and certainty for both lawmakers and affected undertakings. Keywords: special charges; asymmetrical taxes; negative State aid; analogous application
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European State Aid Law Quarterly
European State Aid Law Quarterly Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
On the Qualification of Municipal Authorities as Undertakings · Case C-656/20 P Hermann Albers eK v European Commission · Annotation by Anna Panarella The Three Poisons of Post-Covid State Aid Control: Poland ·P. Kamil Rosiak and Ewa Przybyszewska-Kieniewicz The WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies and EU State Aid for Fisheries United Kingdom ·George Peretz KC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1