宽恕和放手:改变规范景观的方法

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES Revista De Estudios Sociales Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.7440/res86.2023.03
Dana Kay Nelkin
{"title":"宽恕和放手:改变规范景观的方法","authors":"Dana Kay Nelkin","doi":"10.7440/res86.2023.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forgiveness is often distinguished from other ways of eliminating (or reducing) blame, such as letting go. In this paper, I focus on a conception of forgiveness as normative landscape change (alteration of the rights and obligations of relevant parties), and explore the distinction between forgiveness—understood in this way—and letting go. I highlight the explanatory power of this approach for distinguishing forgiveness and letting go, and contrast it with an alternative way, in which the focus is instead primarily on a kind of attitude change. I conclude by comparing the implications of both forgiveness and letting go for other phenomena we care about, such as reconciliation.","PeriodicalId":46119,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Estudios Sociales","volume":"8 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forgiveness and Letting Go: Ways of Changing the Normative Landscape\",\"authors\":\"Dana Kay Nelkin\",\"doi\":\"10.7440/res86.2023.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forgiveness is often distinguished from other ways of eliminating (or reducing) blame, such as letting go. In this paper, I focus on a conception of forgiveness as normative landscape change (alteration of the rights and obligations of relevant parties), and explore the distinction between forgiveness—understood in this way—and letting go. I highlight the explanatory power of this approach for distinguishing forgiveness and letting go, and contrast it with an alternative way, in which the focus is instead primarily on a kind of attitude change. I conclude by comparing the implications of both forgiveness and letting go for other phenomena we care about, such as reconciliation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Estudios Sociales\",\"volume\":\"8 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Estudios Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7440/res86.2023.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Estudios Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/res86.2023.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宽恕通常不同于其他消除(或减少)责备的方式,比如放手。在本文中,我将重点放在宽恕作为规范景观变化(相关方权利和义务的改变)的概念上,并探讨宽恕(以这种方式理解)和放手之间的区别。我强调了这种方法在区分宽恕和放手方面的解释力,并将其与另一种方法进行了对比,在另一种方法中,重点主要放在一种态度的改变上。最后,我比较了宽恕和放手对我们关心的其他现象的影响,比如和解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forgiveness and Letting Go: Ways of Changing the Normative Landscape
Forgiveness is often distinguished from other ways of eliminating (or reducing) blame, such as letting go. In this paper, I focus on a conception of forgiveness as normative landscape change (alteration of the rights and obligations of relevant parties), and explore the distinction between forgiveness—understood in this way—and letting go. I highlight the explanatory power of this approach for distinguishing forgiveness and letting go, and contrast it with an alternative way, in which the focus is instead primarily on a kind of attitude change. I conclude by comparing the implications of both forgiveness and letting go for other phenomena we care about, such as reconciliation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Estudios Sociales (rev. estud.soc.) is an indexed publication of a periodical nature, which adheres to international standards of quality, positioning, periodicity and availability on line. Its objective is to contribute to the dissemination of the research, analyses and opinions that the national and international academic community elaborates. As a social sciences journal, it publishes the results of investigations, reflections on relevant topics, theoretical revisions and reviews, which contribute to pertinent debates about sociological, historical, anthropological, cultural and gender study subjects, as well as articles on political science, philosophy, psychology and education. Is a quarterly publication (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December) that comes out at the beginning of each of these periods, created in1998 and funded by the School of Social Sciences of the Universidad de los Andes (Colombia). All of its digital contents are of open access through its website. The printed version has a cost and may be acquired at specific outlets. The Journal publisehs articles in Spanish, English and Portuguese.
期刊最新文献
“Es que todo está vivo simultáneamente”. Memoria y perdón como rearmonización del territorio entre los pueblos que conforman el Consejo Regional Indígena del Cauca, Colombia Vivir las injusticias globales como personales: los jóvenes alteractivistas Perdón y memoria: oportunidades para la reconciliación. Una introducción Perdón y resiliencia: reflexiones desde las experiencias de víctimas del conflicto armado colombiano en San Juan Nepomuceno, Montes de María, Colombia Ciudadanos del común y construcción de paz. Creencias sociales sobre el perdón, la justicia y la reconciliación en Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1